Yes I added the conjecture. There is far too much bullshit in it.

I fired off a response in line with the England I knew. Simple if they don't identify as girls they should apologise. At no point is a customary greeting usurped. The same greeting employed in every school at the start of lessons. Of which is replied by students, greeting the teacher, afternoon Miss/Mrs. Not spark dumber protest.

Then you commented, and I painstakingly tried to read the article. I did what it did, make up bullshit.

There is too much nonsense in it, least of all in the wording. A dyslexic wrote it. They obviously have issues, trying to formalise insanity.

Yes the school fired, let her go. She created activists. That brainwashing was from her core subjects. These aren't even on the national curriculum today, dropped for years. Private school at the same price as a standard Uni, doesn't either. Perhaps it provides Sex Ed. However unless the formal form and class greeting has been replaced. It hasn't anywhere else. This article is spewing manure. It has a lot of inverted speculation. Where perhaps it is goading its content. Reverse psychology. Insert the hoohaw. Simply because it creates the retorts in a Conservative paper. It then goes and becomes dystopian. All schools must adopt Manning's philosophy.

There simply hasn't been enough to go on, and it wasn't written properly. There are far easier ways of writing that article without any pronouns. Where it hasn't spoke properly. Read it. Instead it created what seems to be conjecture.

She's a gay teacher teaching what subjects? It tired to suggest there was a potty mouth tranny protesting, her formal greeting. Where was any subversion. The tranny not identifying as a girl, learnt the pronouns online, or had her own classes taught them?

Who cares. Except that the formal customary greeting isn't being replaced. It isn't proper form. Despite whatever feeble protests, identifying as God knows.

Yes I added the conjecture. There is far too much bullshit in it.

I fired off a response in line with the England I knew. Simple if they don't identify as girls they should apologise. At no point is a customarily greeting usurped. The same greeting employed in every school at the start of lessons. Of which is replied by students, greeting the teacher, afternoon Miss/Mrs. Not spark dumber protest.

Then you commented, and I painstakingly tried to read the article. I did what it did, make up bullshit.

There is too much nonsense in it, least of all in the wording. A dyslexic wrote it. They obviously have issues, trying to formalise insanity.

Yes the school fired, let her go. She created activists. That brainwashing was from her core subjects. These aren't even on the national curriculum today, dropped for years. Private school at the same price as a standard Uni, doesn't either. Perhaps it provides Sex Ed. However unless the formal form and class greeting has been replaced. It hasn't anywhere else. This article is spewing manure. It has a lot of inverted speculation. Where perhaps it is goading its content. Reverse psychology. Insert the hoohaw. Simply because it creates the retorts in a Conservative paper. It then goes and becomes dystopian. All schools must adopt Manning's philosophy.

There simply hasn't been enough to go on, and it wasn't written properly. There are far easier ways of writing that article without any pronouns. Where it hasn't spoke properly. Read it. Instead it created what seems to be conjecture.

She's a gay teacher teaching what subjects? It tired to suggest there was a potty mouth tranny protesting, her formal greeting. Where was any subversion. The tranny not identifying as a girl, learnt the pronouns online, or had her own classes taught them?

Who cares. Except that the formal customary greeting isn't being replaced. It isn't proper form. Despite whatever feeble protests, identifying as God knows.

Yes I added the conjecture. There is far too much bullshit in it.

I fired off a response in line with the England I knew. Simple if they don't identify as girls they should apologise. At no point is a customarily greeting usurped. The same greeting employed in every school at the start of lessons. Of which is replied by students, greeting the teacher, afternoon Miss/Mrs. Not spark dumber protest.

Then you commented, and I painstakingly tried to read the article. I did what it did, make up bullshit.

There is too much nonsense in it, least of all in the wording. A dyslexic wrote it. They obviously have issues, trying to formalise insanity.

Yes the school fired let her go. She created activists. That brainwashing was from her core subjects. These aren't even on the national curriculum today, dropped for years. Private school at the same price as a standard Uni, doesn't either. Perhaps it provides Sex Ed. However unless the formal form and class greeting has been replaced. It hasn't anywhere else. This article is spewing manure. It has a lot of inverted speculation. Where perhaps it is goading its content. Reverse psychology. Insert the hoohaw. Simply because it creates the retorts in a Conservative paper. It then goes and becomes dystopian. All schools must adopt Manning's philosophy.

There simply hasn't been enough to go on, and it wasn't written properly. There are far easier ways of writing that article without any pronouns. Where it hasn't spoke properly. Read it. Instead it created what seems to be conjecture.

She's a gay teacher teaching what subjects, it tired to suggest there was a potty mouth tranny protesting. Her formal greeting. Where was any subversion. The tranny not identifying as a girl, learnt the pronouns online, or had her own classes taught them?

Who cares. Except that the formal customary greeting isn't being replaced. It isn't proper form. Despite whatever feeble protests, identifying as God knows.