Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inconclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops. Who knows.
One way or another?
Back to the blood. Yawn. The above is there. Its implications are far worse.
Whatever retard. That stupid down vote. Because you needed to prove what topically? You linked shit regarding a 2014 study. How far did those transfusions go? The human trials. Did they stop aging? What are you down voting?
Instead like a generic monkey. You haven't understood me. Because you needed a myth of vampirism?
Here are synthetic mice being grown https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/model-embryo-from-stem-cells
Here is mice anti aging
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/nov/28/scientists-reverse-ageing-mice-humans
Outside of the above. Here is where that tech is https://interestingengineering.com/science/anti-aging-30-years
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inconclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops. Who knows.
One way or another?
Back to the blood. Yawn. The above is there. Its implications are far worse.
Whatever retard. That stupid down vote. Because you needed to prove what topically? You linked shit regarding a 2014 study. How far did those transfusions go? The human trials. Did they stop aging? What are you down voting?
Instead like a generic monkey. You haven't understood me. Because you needed a myth of vampirism?
Here are synthetic mice being grown https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/model-embryo-from-stem-cells
Here are mice is mice anti aging
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/nov/28/scientists-reverse-ageing-mice-humans
Outside of the above.
Here is where that tech is https://interestingengineering.com/science/anti-aging-30-years
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inconclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops. Who knows.
One way or another?
Back to the blood. Yawn. The above is there. Its implications are far worse.
Whatever retard. That stupid down vote. Because you needed to prove what topically? You linked shit regarding a 2014 study. How far did those transfusions go? The human trials. Did they stop aging? What are you down voting?
Instead like a generic monkey. You haven't understood me. Because you needed a myth of vampirism?
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops. Who knows.
One way or another?
Back to the blood. Yawn. The above is there. Its implications are far worse.
Whatever retard. That stupid down vote. Because you needed to prove what topically? You linked shit regarding a 2014 study. How far did those transfusions go? The human trials. Did they stop aging? What are you down voting?
Instead like a generic monkey. You haven't understood me. Because you needed a myth of vampirism?
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops. Who knows.
One way or another?
Back to the blood. Yawn. The above is there. Its implications are far worse.
Whatever retard. That stupid down vote. Because you needed to prove what topically? You linked shit regarding a 2014 study. How far did those transfusions go? The human trials. Did they stop aging? What are you down voting?
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops. Who knows.
One way or another?
Back to the blood. Yawn. The above is there. Its implications are far worse.
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops. Who knows.
One way or another?
Back to the blood. Yawn. The above is there. It's implications are far worse.
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops. Who knows.
One way or another?
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
The fundamental problem is if somebody has cracked it. They'd never publicise it. It to my knowledge has not, not by blood, because it has a heap of other problems related on repeated transfusion.
They've started the clones. Unclear how cloned. I think they've almost done it all outside of a surrogate. How cloned, a cloned emybro put into a surrogate and artificially inseminated yes? Except I believe they've done the whole thing artificially. I am shocked it has gone ahead. Not that shocked. Matter of time. Despite everybody else spewing ethics.
https://futureworld.org/mindbullets/worlds-first-cloned-human-turns-14/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eve-first-human-clone/
Because this, .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461
Above probably went off the medical record and got integrated into blacks ops.
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Supposedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.
Bullshit study on blood. It didn't get much further. It didn't anti age. It provided some vitality benefits. Cognetive functions.
The study was inclusive. Surgically attached mice? Hahaha. It aged the donor, younger mice rapidly, but provided the older mice with improved cognitive functions. So what.
They went on to test it. Old people were given blood transfusions at 6k a pop. How did that go?
You haven't researched it much more, that was almost a decade ago. 2014. So what went wrong? It was taking over from other studies again the research went dark. Stopped. 1930-50s? Something. Then decades later back to it.
Kim Jung Il, right? Suppsedly transfused virgin blood regularly. How old did he live for? There have been others transplanting very young organs.
Stemcells, are in treatments, creams, organ transplants, plastic surgery. They are far more effective.
But where there are the claims of increased longevity is manipulating the DNA by editing the genes of the mice. They have lived for around 30% longer.
This cannot be done on humans or you're creating clones, suggestively they can faster be harvested for benefits. Or it's new human beings grown by artifical insemination and embryo manipulation by gene editing. They have done this to some extents. Researching it more in quite a few programs. More is off the grid. Studies not Googled. But claims of.
That tech isn't there yet. To knowledge.
But the blood shit is pretty much myth outside of some vitality benefits. Almost everything else has similar claims of vitality.
Or find what happened to the rest of that linked study? It's been almost a decade 2014, whatever. Same as it did decades ago I'd imagine. The stuff of vampires. Myths and cannibals.