The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides, God and Mankind

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come, a Savior

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet, co-creation restored

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means, humble tools to an angry high God

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

1. does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

2. uses force where love is required...

I'll defend Christ instead: but with an eye to persuasion, rather than coercion. God wants us all back from the prior exhile to rule-by-djinn. May it be so.

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some... vvvvvvvv

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspects of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides, God and Mankind

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come, a Savior

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet, co-creation restored

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means, humble tools to an angry high God

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

1. does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

2. uses force where love is required...

I'll defend Christ instead: but with an eye to persuasion, rather than coercion. God wants us all back from the prior exhile to rule-by-djinn. May it be so.

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspects of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides, God and Mankind

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come, a Savior

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet, co-creation restored

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means, humble tools to an angry high God

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

1. does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

2. uses force where love is required...

I'll defend Christ instead: but with an eye to persuasion, rather than coercion. God wants us all back from the prior exhile to rule-by-djinn. May it be so.

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspects of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides, God and Mankind

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come, a Savior

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet, co-creation restored

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means, humble tools to an angry high God

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

a) does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

b) uses force where love is required...

I'll defend Christ instead: but with an eye to persuasion, rather than coercion. God wants us all back from the prior exhile to rule-by-djinn. May it be so.

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspects of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides, God and Mankind

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come, a Savior

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet, co-creation restored

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means, humble tools to an angry high God

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

a) does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

b) uses force where love is required, instead...

I'll defend Christ instead: but with an eye to persuasion, rather than coercion. God wants us all back from the prior exhile to rule-by-djinn. May it be so.

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspects of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides, God and Mankind

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come, a Savior

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet, co-creation restored

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means, humble tools to an angry high God

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

a) does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

b) uses force where love is required, instead...

I'll defend Christ instead: but with an eye to persuasion, rather than coercion. God wants us all back from the prior exhile to rule-by-djinn. May it be so.

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspect of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

a) does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

b) uses force where love is required, instead...

I'll defend Christ instead: but with an eye to persuasion, rather than coercion. God wants us all back from the prior exhile to rule-by-djinn. May it be so.

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspect of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

a) does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

b) uses force where love is required, instead...

I'll defend Christ instead: but with an eye to persuadion, rather than coercion.

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspect of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

a) does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

b) uses force where love is required, instead...

I'll defend Christ instead: but with an eye to persuadion, rather than coercion.

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspect of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means

Force has no role in love. So the Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

a) does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

b) uses force where love is required, instead...

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspect of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides

• The 2nd temple Jewish spirit was pregnant, and promising of something-yet-to-come

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means

Force has no role in love. The Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

a) does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

b) uses force where love is required, instead...

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspect of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).

The difference in the spirits:

• The Adamic spirit was rejection, from both sides

• The Jewish spirit was pregnant and promising

• The Christian spirit is delivered sonship, already but not yet

• The Muslim spirit is submission, by all necessary means

Force has no role in love. The Love arc in the above story of humanity, is only shown in A-J-C. This means that "defending Abrahamic religion":

a) does not cover all that needs defense, as it leaves out pre-Abrahamic humanity...

and

b) uses force where love is required, instead...

These rabbit trails are not the point, but I'll engage even here some...

🐰1: Mohammed was a pedophile: Aisha was 9 when he sexed her up. He was also a warlord; cf the Arabic heritage imposed on the entire Medditerranean via invasion. These are both disgusting aspect of a "perfect person"; yet I've used this to talk with you. Filth. Used to present better.

🐰2: Revisit your stats. VERY few people have enough faith in themselves to be entire atheists... Certainly not a "majority". So the discussion of fragility is mired in your bad hypostasis.

🐰3: Your repeated return to Piss Christ, is you lathering yourself up over a non-issue. Nobody sensible argues that it has value. We all discounted it as worthless speech, or worse. LONG AGO.

🐰4: What you mean by "defend" is materially violent, by the examples you give of "beating". This accomplishes "submission", as is your faith-tenet, but ennobles nothing and no one; and comprises a rotten core, held central in Islam: jihad and jizyah. Freedom of speech sublimates physical fighting to mere words. This converts Force (Mo) into Persuasion (JC).