I find this dubious at best.
Where is the original document.
Surely it would be on display in its original print and format. Instead of it claiming suprious hindsight. Providing a much later background.
Why was it referred to as Nazism? It didn't exist yet.
How could he accurately predict it, if the article is genuine? Why would he use the term Nazi? This doesn't seem probable. In fact, did German's even call themselves Nazis?
The problem with any predictions is that they're often interpretations. Afterwards it seems likely to create hoaxes and claims. In the 60s it seems far more probable.
I am struggling to find the advantage. Apart from a new World power emerging from its conquest and it would be robotic and AI. Except that seems illogical then. Instead it's prophesied as Satanism. His claims are featured in the book of Satan.
Unfortunately it is far too accurate to be genuine. It employs no code or member only words that motion, because of vague predictions and foretelling subjective to constant change. It is accurate to the point of insanity. If those events didn't exist who is the lunatic saying them. So ritualistic code is employed right? You find this with every order, society, and religion.
I find this dubious at best.
Where is the original document.
Surely it would be on display in its original print and format. Instead of it claiming suprious hindsight. Providing a much later background.
Why was it referred to as Nazism? It didn't exist yet.
How could he accurately predict it, if the article is genuine? Why would he use the term Nazi? This doesn't seem probable.
The problem with any predictions is that they're often interpretations. Afterwards it seems likely to create hoaxes and claims. In the 60s it seems far more probable.
I am struggling to find the advantage. Apart from a new World power emerging from its conquest and it would be robotic and AI. Except that seems illogical then. Instead it's prophesied as Satanism. His claims are featured in the book of Satan.
Unfortunately it is far too accurate to be genuine. It employs no code or member only words that motion, because of vague predictions and foretelling subjective to constant change. It is accurate to the point of insanity. If those events didn't exist who is the lunatic saying them. So ritualistic code is employed right? You find this with every order, society, and religion.
I find this dubious at best.
Where is the original document.
Surely it would be on display in its original print and format. Instead of it claiming suprious hindsight. Providing a later background.
Why was it referred to as Nazism? It didn't exist yet.
How could he accurately predict it, if the article is genuine? Why would he use the term Nazi? This doesn't seem probable.
The problem with any predictions is that they're often interpretations. Afterwards it seems likely yo create hoaxes and claims. In the 60s it seems far more probable.
I am struggling to find the advantage. Apart from a new World power emerging from, it would be robotic and AI. Except that seems illogical then. Instead it prophesied Satanism. His claims are featured in the book of Satan.
Unfortunately it is far too accurate to be genuine. It employs no code or member only words that motion because of vague predictions and foretelling subjective to constant change.