Fuck off idiot. Put that into a dictionary.

Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toilet.

How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War. Please mark it with an X.

Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.

How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?

Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.

We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.

If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.

There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.

It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing. Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged. The new apple watches are very clever, how many trenches dug. The dog tag activity is in GPS. Did the Satellite images, it has identified and complied a glossary?

I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toilet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.

Fuck off idiot. Put that into a dictionary.

Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toilet.

How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War..Please mark it with an X.

Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.

How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?

Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.

We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.

If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.

There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.

It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing. Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged. The new apple watches are very clever, how many trenches dug. The dog tag activity is in GPS. Did the Satellite images, it has identified and complied a glossary?

I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toilet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.

Fuck off idiot. Put that into a dictionary.

Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toliet.

How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War..Please mark it with an X.

Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.

How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?

Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.

We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.

If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.

There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.

It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing. Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged. The new apple watches are very clever, how many trenches dug. The dog tag activity is in GPS. Did the Satellite images, it has identified and complied a glossary?

I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toilet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.

Fuck off idiot. Put that into a dictionary.

Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toliet.

How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War..Please mark it with an X.

Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.

How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?

Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.

We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.

If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.

There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.

It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing? Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged, the new apple watches, very clever how many trenches dug? The dog tag activity is in GPS? Did the Satellite images, it has identified and complied a glossary?

I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toilet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.

Fuck off idiot. Put that into a dictionary.

Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toliet.

How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War..Please mark it with an X.

Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.

How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?

Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.

We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.

If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.

There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.

It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing? Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged, the new apple watches, very clever how many trenches dug? The dog tag activity is in GPS? Did the Satellite images, it has identified and complied a glossary?

I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toliet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.

Fuck off idiot. Put that into a dictionary.

Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toliet.

How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War..Please mark it with an X.

Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.

How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?

Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.

We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.

If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.

There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.

It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing? Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged, the new apple watches, very clever how many trenches dug? The dog tag activity is in GPS? Did the Satellite images, it has identified a complied a glossary?

I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toliet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.

Fuck off idiot. Put that into a dictionary.

Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toliet.

How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar for the next report, when a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War..Please mark it with an X.

Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade, immediately.

How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?

Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion has been marked on the map. Clearly they need the cover.

We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.

If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.

There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut brigades have fallen. Please move the slider back and reform them into the next cluster.

It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing? Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates are fully tagged? Dog tag activity? Did the Satellite images?

I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toliet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, with the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse. They're completely Nato inclusive.

Fuck off idiot. Put that into dictionary.

Look at that link, it's laughably a low tier report. If it is indeed genuine. An online newspaper bulletin for which classification. The local community. The stuff a janitor finds clogging the toliet.

How is it verified? Quick, take a few units off the slider bar. For the next report. When a Battalion of armor is destroyed in the Tank War..Please mark it with an X.

Authorise more funding for another Tank brigade.

How has it verified, allies. If they're operating in special forces?

Don't worry we just mark our own. Very important risk factor. The Ranger battalion is marked on the map. Clearly the need the cover.

We know how many rounds they have, they keep asking for more of it. It's now hooked into the military phone, it keeps a record. They're connected to the data sharing, providing the causality rate. We fit them with the microchips. Beep beep.

If enemy bombs are dropped draw a map, it is uploaded to the data sharing.

There is nothing inside of it apart from conjecture and speculation. On a changing battlefield. Next week need a better headline guys. The Bakhmut btigades have fallen. Please move the slider back reform them into the next cluster.

It looks like the stuff a computer game is made out of. How are any audits made? Who uploaded it to Pentagon? Clearly it handles all the data sharing? Did the Ukraines upload their body cams, using the new apple watches, daily munition rates? Dog tag activity? Did the Satellite images?

I am curious how the weekly newspaper for the top secrets is compiled with the little icons and glossary of its detailed appendix for the weekly risk assessment, any janitors found in the toliet? It contained the entire Natopian encyclopedia. I think those are very inclusive icons, eith the special forces on them. Look at that tank. What model is that? Very diverse.