and there is a need to "keep it simple"

I agree, but just as (if not more) important as that - is to be correct. The statement that the sun only appears to set due to perspective is wrong.

If the sun actually set purely by perspective, it would shrink to a dot. It doesn’t. It goes down like a ship “over the horizon” and for the same reasons.

Encouraging people to believe and repeat this demonstrably incorrect statement is an attack on them from the flat earth psyop.

The real reason for the appearance of the sun setting/rising is due to refraction caused by the density gradient in our air.

and there is a need to "keep it simple"

I agree, but just as (if not more) important as that is to be correct. The statement that the sun only appears to set due to perspective is wrong.

If the sun actually set purely by perspective, it would shrink to a dot. It doesn’t. It goes down like a ship “over the horizon” and for the same reasons.

Encouraging people to believe and repeat this demonstrably incorrect statement is an attack on them from the flat earth psyop.

The real reason for the appearance of the sun setting/rising is due to refraction caused by the density gradient in our air.

and there is a need to "keep it simple"

I agree, but just as (if not more) important than that is to be correct. The statement that the sun only appears to set due to perspective is wrong.

If the sun actually set purely by perspective, it would shrink to a dot. It doesn’t. It goes down like a ship “over the horizon” and for the same reasons.

Encouraging people to believe and repeat this demonstrably incorrect statement is an attack on them from the flat earth psyop.

The real reason for the appearance of the sun setting/rising is due to refraction caused by the density gradient in our air.