It makes no difference. The documents are old by almost a month. How was it circulated when it had for a your eyes only seal?

It is a presumed budget, regarding supplies, reinforcements, causalities of Ukrainian numbers.

How are these documents even verified, in Ukraine, and they're still subjective to change? Any muntion drops, the budget, casualties.

The leak then look, becomes a hoax. It becomes a 4d chess move. A gambit. It throws any other possible information into question. If it was supposedly credible. It can even cause enemy to do something contrary as it uses the subterfuge.

Or let's try to suggest it is genuine. A third party whistleblew. Let's face it, any asset would remain funnelling Intel. Unless it was a one-shot deal. They possibly could only get the cheese by an accident. Airing it has caused any numbers to change. Why would you announce it. Unless it causes damages. Distrust in the billions invested, the causality figures by comparison, and the constant supply and depth of involvement.

Has it changed anything except any plans? It's like Mickey Mouse wrote them. Russians are banned from Twitter. Air the Secret Plans on Twitter. Has it caused any damage to the people making plans. Embarrassment perhaps. Not even. Falling for it is often worse.

The top secret spring offensive is largely propaganda, the Ukrainians are attacking. It sounds chessy because it is. Location of attack, precisely. Umm umm what's up doc? Blank. They will decide later. Has it given away the locations of the Himlars? No but Russia might try to shoot at something? Come on.

Who cares? Is like movie. By talking about it suddenly causes more bullshit. It shouldn't. It sounds stupid. Level of bullshit today. It makes no real difference. Except it causes bullshit.

It makes no difference. The documents are old by almost a month. How was it circulated when it had for a your eyes only seal?

It is a presumed budget, regarding supplies, reinforcements, causalities of Ukrainian numbers.

How are these documents even verified, in Ukraine, and they're still subjective to change? Any muntion drops, the budget, casualties.

The leak then look, becomes a hoax. It becomes a 4d chess move. A gambit. It throws any other possible information into question. If it was supposedly credible. It can even cause enemy to do something contrary as it uses the subterfuge.

Or let's try to suggest it is genuine. A third party whistleblew. Let's face it, any asset would remain funnelling Intel. Unless it was a one-shot deal. They possibly could only get the cheese by an accident. Airing it has caused any numbers to change. Why would you announce it. Unless it causes damages. Distrust in the billions invested, the causality figures by comparison, and the constant supply and depth of involvement.

Has it changed anything except any plans? It's like Mickey Mouse wrote them. Russians are banned from Twitter. Air the Secret Plans on Twitter. Has it caused any damage to the people making plans. Embarrassment perhaps. Not even. Falling for it is often worse. Recalling the last time this tactic was deployed this war. Top secret documents were left at a bus stop then shortly a particular Cruiser was fired at.

The top secret spring offensive is largely propaganda, the Ukrainians are attacking. It sounds chessy because it is. Location of attack, precisely. Umm umm what's up doc? Blank. They will decide later. Has it given away the locations of the Himlars? No but Russia might try to shoot at something? Come on.

Who cares? Is like movie. By talking about it suddenly causes more bullshit. It shouldn't. It sounds stupid. Level of bullshit today. It makes no real difference. Except it causes bullshit.

It makes no difference. The documents are old by almost a month. How was it circulated when it had for a your eyes only seal?

It is a presumed budget, regarding supplies, reinforcements, causalities of Ukrainian numbers.

How are these documents even verified, in Ukraine, and they're still subjective to change? Any muntion drops, the budget, casualties.

The leak then look, becomes a hoax. It becomes a 4d chess move. A gambit. It throws any other possible information into question. If it was supposedly credible. It can even cause enemy to do something contrary as it uses the subterfuge.

Or let's try to suggest it is genuine. A third party whistleblew. Let's face it, any asset would remain funnelling Intel. Unless it was a one-shot deal. They possibly could only get the cheese by an accident. Airing it has caused any numbers to change. Why would you announce it. Unless it causes damages. Distrust in the billions invested, the causality figures by comparison, and the constant supply and depth of involvement.

Has it changed anything except any plans? It's like Mickley Mouse wrote them. Russians are banned from Twitter. Air the Secret Plans on Twitter. Has it caused any damage to the people making plans. Embarrassment perhaps. Not even. Falling for it is often worse. Recalling the last time this tactic was deployed this war. Top secret documents were left at a bus stop then shortly a particular Cruiser was fired at.

The top secret spring offensive is largely propaganda, the Ukrainians are attacking. It sounds chessy because it is. Location of attack, precisely. Umm umm what's up doc? Blank. They will decide later. Has it given away the locations of the Himlars? No but Russia might try to shoot at something? Come on.

Who cares? Is like movie. By talking about it suddenly causes more bullshit. It shouldn't. It sounds stupid. Level of bullshit today. It makes no real difference. Except it causes bullshit.

It makes no difference. The documents are old by almost a month. How was it circulated when it had for a your eyes only seal?

It is a presumed budget, regarding supplies, reinforcements, causalities of Ukrainian numbers.

How are these documents even verified, in Ukraine, and they're still subjective to change? Any muntion drops, the budget, casualties.

The leak then look, becomes a hoax. It becomes a 4d chess move. A gambit. It throws any other possible information into question. If it was supposedly credible. It can even cause enemy to do something contrary as it uses the subterfuge.

Or let's try to suggest it is genuine. A third party whistleblew. Let's face it, any asset would remain funnelling Intel. Unless it was a one-shot deal. They possibly could only get the cheese by an accident. Airing it has caused any numbers to change. Why would you announce it. Unless it causes damages. Distrust in the billions invested, the causality figures by comparison, and the constant supply and depth of involvement.

Has it changed anything except any plans? It's like Mickley Mouse wrote them. Russians are banned from Twitter. Air the Secret Plans on Twitter. Has it caused any damage to the people making plans. Embarrassment perhaps. Not even. Falling for it is often worse. Recalling the last time this tactic was deployed this war. Top secret documents were left at a bus stop then shortly a particular Cruiser was fired at.

The top secret spring offensive is largely propaganda, the Ukrainians are attacking. It sounds chessy because it is. Location of attack, precisely. Umm umm what's up doc? Blank. They will decide later. Has it given away the locations of the Himlars? No but Russia might try to shoot at something? Come on.

Who cares? Is like movie.

It makes no difference. The documents are old by almost a month. How was it circulated when it had for a your eyes only seal?

It is a presumed budget, regarding supplies, reinforcements, causalities of Ukrainian numbers.

How are these documents even verified, in Ukraine, and they're still subjective to change? Any muntion drops, the budget, casualties.

The leak then look, becomes a hoax. It becomes a 4d chess move. A gambit. It throws any other possible information into question. If it was supposedly credible. It can even cause enemy to do something contrary as it uses the subterfuge.

Or let's try to suggest it is genuine. A third party whistleblew. Let's face it, any asset would remain funnelling Intel. Unless it was a one-shot deal. They possibly could only get the cheese by an accident. Airing it has caused any numbers to change. Why would you announce it. Unless it causes damages. Distrust in the billions invested, the causality figures by comparison, and the constant supply and depth of involvement.

Has it changed anything except any plans? It's like Mickley Mouse wrote them. Russians are banned from Twitter. Air the Secret Plans on Twitter. Has it caused any damage to the people making plans. Embarrassment perhaps. Not even. Falling for it is often worse. Recalling the last time this tactic was deployed this war. Top secret documents were left at a bus stop then shortly a particular Cruiser was fired at.

The top secret spring offensive is largely propaganda, the Ukrainians are atracking. It sounds chessy because it is.