No.
What are we talking about? Top secret Twitter leaks?
Hahahaha. Pull my leg. Top secret twitter feeds.
Wouldn't you keep your asset intact. They'll be more than one briefing. Why risk the exposure. If indeed it had a source of pivotal Intel. It's not like a defection, the walls are caving in better incite them more.
You mean a third party. Why? Hahaha.
Who cares. Look Marcon in China. Doesn't it suggest. It's far more problematic. Why would there be a Chinese diplomatic solution. It specifically states, no Crimea. What does Ukraine say no peace without the Crimea. Somehow it thinks to assuage any trade? But solve global peace? You mean he needs the cookie points for French protest. Send the tanks in.
Other than the Russians have taken Bakhmut, no Ukraine is still holding out. He said, and they said, who said what. Who cares, it either is, or isn't. Until then it isn't worth the paper it's printed on.
Who really cares is that point. I am not a Russian at all. I don't care apart from hearing something without secular narratives. It's called advertising one narrative. It's a product I am not buying. Why would I. Some foreigner dictating global peace from a shithole, is interesting. Not my problem, go away. Why would I care. I don't live there. As far as any actual news went, it has become a source of gossip.
Not my problem. Until there's a bigger war, or there's peace. At this point there won't be peace. So why do I care who loses what? When there's peace it will become problematic look at it. What solution do you see from it?
No.
What are we talking about? Top secret Twitter leaks?
Hahahaha. Pull my leg. Top secret twitter feeds.
Wouldn't you keep your asset intact. They'll be more than one briefing. Why risk the exposure. If indeed it had a source of pivotal Intel. It's not like a defection, the walls are caving in better incite them more.
You mean a third party. Why? Hahaha.
Who cares. Look Marcon in China. Doesn't it suggest. It's far more problematic. Why would there be a Chinese diplomatic solution. It specifically states, no Crimea. What does Ukraine say no peace without the Crimea. Somehow it thinks to assuage any trade? But solve global peace? You mean he needs the cookie points for French protest. Send the tanks in.
Other than the Russians have taken Bakhmut, no Ukraine is still holding out. He said, and they said, who said what. Who cares, it either is, or isn't. Until then it isn't worth the paper it's printed on.
Who really cares is that point. I am not a Russian at all. I don't care apart from hearing something without secular narratives. It's called advertising one narrative. It's a product I am not buying. Why would I. Some foreigner dictating global peace from a shithole, is interesting, Not my pronlem, go away. Why would I care. I don't live there. As far as any actual news went, it has become a source of gossip.
Not my problem. Until there's a bigger war, or there's peace. At this point there won't be peace. So why do I care who loses what? When there's peace it will become problematic look at it. What solution do you see from it?
No.
What are we talking about? Top secret Twitter leaks?
Hahahaha. Pull my leg. Top secret twitter feeds.
Wouldn't you keep your asset intact. They'll be more than one briefing. Why risk the exposure. If indeed it had a source of pivotal Intel. It's not like a defection, the walls are caving in better incite them more.
You mean a third party. Why? Hahaha.
Who cares. Look Marcon in China. Doesn't it suggest. It's far more problematic. Why would there be a Chinese diplomatic solution. It specifically states, no Crimea. What does Ukraine say no peace without the Crimea. Somehow it thinks to assuage any trade? But solve global peace? You mean he needs the cookie points for French protest. Send the tanks in.
Other than the Russians have taken Bakhmut, no Ukraine is still holding out. He said, and they said, who said what. Who cares, it either is, or isn't. Until then it isn't worth the paper it's printed on.