Why is it that the jews have the lead in all crime over history?

Because the many are consenting to follow their leading suggestions (progressivism).

Why are all criminal words of jewish origin?

Because the many consent to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words.

Why when we consider financial crimes, the only significant numbers are jewish?

a) if the many ignore to evaluate (perceiving) value (perceivable) for suggested values by the few, then the few gain the power to put a price on reality; make compound interest out of the ignorant many, while drowning them with mental and physical debt and continue to devalue their choice of evaluation.

b) the few suggest numbers (plural) to tempt each "one" of the many to ignore perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit", from U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one" (singular).

Those who consent to suggested counting of others, ignore expressing "one" self, while the suggesting few call themselves "counts"... https://pic8.co/sh/1rIGYa.jpg

Is it because they are smart?

If the many consent to suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand), then that implies them willingly "standing under" the suggesting few. If the many would adapt to KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists", each one of them could grow comprehension of perceivable, yet putting themselves underneath others seems to be more tempting than the effort of growing oneself...

there is a reason

Reasoning represents ones consent to want versus not want suggested information aka a conflict among the many about the suggestions of the few. A self imposed mental hamster wheel that gives the suggesting few the power to control both sides of every conflict of reason by first defining (idolatry); then redefining (revisionism) and finally contradicting (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information for both sides within every conflict of reason.

numbers don't lie; like the jews do.

a) what if all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power" alas partial ones (living) within whole oneness (process of dying)?

b) what if perceiving differences (living) within perceivable sameness (process of dying) can be tempted by suggested likeness, under disguise of sameness, to ignore differences? Hence equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)....

c) what if ones consent to suggested truth (want) tempts one into a conflict against suggested lies (not want), while both sides ignore perceivable change (need)? Why need? Because being (life) within change (inception towards death) implies the need to resist being changed from alive to dead.

history

What if HE BREW HIS STORY to tempt you to ignore yours? What if your story within nature doesn't require narration?

Why is it that the jews have the lead in all crime over history?

Because the many are consenting to follow their leading suggestions (progressivism).

Why are all criminal words of jewish origin?

Because the many consent to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words.

Why when we consider financial crimes, the only significant numbers are jewish?

a) if the many ignore to evaluate (perceiving) value (perceivable) for suggested values by the few, then the few gain the power to put a price on reality; make compound interest out of the ignorant many, while drowning them with mental and physical debt and continue to devalue their choice of evaluation.

b) the few suggest numbers (plural) to tempt each "one" of the many to ignore perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit", from U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one" (singular).

Those who consent to suggested counting of others, ignore expressing "one" self, while the suggesting few call themselves "counts"... U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, one; unitas, unity.]

Is it because they are smart?

If the many consent to suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand), then that implies them willingly "standing under" the suggesting few. If the many would adapt to KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists", each one of them could grow comprehension of perceivable, yet putting themselves underneath others seems to be more tempting than the effort of growing oneself...

there is a reason

Reasoning represents ones consent to want versus not want suggested information aka a conflict among the many about the suggestions of the few. A self imposed mental hamster wheel that gives the suggesting few the power to control both sides of every conflict of reason by first defining (idolatry); then redefining (revisionism) and finally contradicting (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information for both sides within every conflict of reason.

numbers don't lie; like the jews do.

a) what if all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power" alas partial ones (living) within whole oneness (process of dying)?

b) what if perceiving differences (living) within perceivable sameness (process of dying) can be tempted by suggested likeness, under disguise of sameness, to ignore differences? Hence equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)....

c) what if ones consent to suggested truth (want) tempts one into a conflict against suggested lies (not want), while both sides ignore perceivable change (need)? Why need? Because being (life) within change (inception towards death) implies the need to resist being changed from alive to dead.

history

What if HE BREW HIS STORY to tempt you to ignore yours? What if your story within nature doesn't require narration?

Why is it that the jews have the lead in all crime over history?

Because the many are consenting to follow their leading suggestions (progressivism).

Why are all criminal words of jewish origin?

Because the many consent to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words.

Why when we consider financial crimes, the only significant numbers are jewish?

a) if the many ignore to evaluate (perceiving) value (perceivable) for suggested values by the few, then the few gain the power to put a price on reality; make compound interest out of the ignorant many, while drowning them with mental and physical debt and continue to devalue their choice of evaluation.

b) the few suggest numbers (plural) to tempt each "one" of the many to ignore perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit", from U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one" (singular).

Those who consent to suggested counting of others, ignore expressing "one" self, while the suggesting few call themselves "counts"... U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, one; unitas, unity.]

Is it because they are smart?

If the many consent to suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand), then that implies them willingly "standing under" the suggesting few. If the many would adapt to KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists", each one of them could grow comprehension of perceivable, yet putting themselves underneath others seems to be more tempting than the effort of growing oneself...

there is a reason

Reasoning represents ones consent to want versus not want suggested information aka a conflict among the many about the suggestions of the few. A self imposed mental hamster wheel that gives the suggesting few the power to control both sides of every conflict of reason by first defining (idolatry; then redefining (revisionism) and finally contradicting (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information for both sides within every conflict of reason.

numbers don't lie; like the jews do.

a) what if all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power" alas partial ones (living) within whole oneness (process of dying)?

b) what if perceiving differences (living) within perceivable sameness (process of dying) can be tempted by suggested likeness, under disguise of sameness, to ignore differences? Hence equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)....

c) what if ones consent to suggested truth (want) tempts one into a conflict against suggested lies (not want), while both sides ignore perceivable change (need)? Why need? Because being (life) within change (inception towards death) implies the need to resist being changed from alive to dead.

history

What if HE BREW HIS STORY to tempt you to ignore yours? What if your story within nature doesn't require narration?