Secular vs Religious

a) RELIGION, noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of perceivable (balance) to perceiving (choice) natural law.

b) the few suggest secularism to tempt the many to ignore perceivable SEC'ULAR, adjective - "living within the world without being relegated, hence without consenting to being bind anew by the suggestions of others.

It's ones consent to the suggested -ISM, which tempts one into consent to contract law (religio). Nature doesn't suggest...it communicates everything perceivable to every perceiving one aka enacting towards reaction.

Do you think it's all the same, or different factions?

a) everything (process of dying) represents sameness, everyone within represents differentiation (living).

b) nature sets itself apart, hence from wholeness (process of dying) into apartheid (living). Living represents ones struggle to sustain apartheid while being dissolved back into wholeness.

c) the few represents apartheid (israel), while suggesting the many togetherness aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); e pluribus unum (out of many; one); equality (sameness) through diversity (difference); united nations; united states; european union; usmca (formerly nafta); uniformity; university; unilateral etc.

ISRA'EL; from SARA (contention; resistance) EL (god) aka partial (living) resisting whole (process of dying) to sustain apartheid within wholeness.

d) FAC'TION, noun [Latin factio, from facio, to make or do.] - "acting in union"...the few suggest the many to shape factions, as to tempt each one of them to ignore being the partial reaction (living) within the enacting whole (process of dying).

One cannot "make"; only RE (respond to) MAKE (being made by). One cannot "do"; only RE (respond to) DO (being done by). Others can suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death).

If one consents to suggested "actors", then the perceiving one (life) ignores to "react" to the perceivable direction (inception towards death) inspiring one to resist.

reject hedonism and materialism

Accepting (want) or rejecting (not want) any suggested -ISM, tempts one to ignore adaptation (need) to perceivable, while resisting suggested temptation (want).

Aren't the secular Jews the more Socialist ones?

SO'CIAL, adjective [Latin socialis, from socius, companion.] - "the publice as an aggregate body"...the few suggest socialism (togetherness) to tempt the consenting many to ignore perceivable apartheid (aka being partial within whole).

If each "one" of the many ignores to represent free will of choice within perceivable; for consenting to the suggested choices of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection; choice".

In short...being one (apart from others) contradicts being social (togetherness). Suggested society represents the domestication of each "ones" free will of choice to follow the suggested choices of the few, hence CHATTEL, noun - "movable goods" slavery by consent of the (freehold) cattle aka those with "free" will of choice.

talmud

TALMUD (instruction) for MiSHNAH (perceivable inspiration) + GEMARA (suggested information)...it represents ones free will of choice to resist want (suggested) for need (perceivable). That implies the want to be instructed by a book suggested by others, which tempts one to be bound (contract law) by volume (book) to the choices of others.

It's not about what's written in any book, but about what the composition of form within flow implies...nature doesn't use words to communicate itself. The few suggest words (information) to tempt the many to ignore sound (inspiration).

Those adapting to sound represent PHONETICIANS, from PHON'ICS, noun [Gr. sound.] , while those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words are controlled by "definitions", hence representing DEAF PHONETICIANS. This is called spell-craft.

Secular vs Religious

a) RELIGION, noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of perceivable (balance) to perceiving (choice) natural law.

b) the few suggest secularism to tempt the many to ignore perceivable SEC'ULAR, adjective - "living within the world without being relegated, hence without consenting to being bind anew by the suggestions of others.

It's ones consent to the suggested -ISM, which tempts one into consent to contract law (religio). Nature doesn't suggest...it communicates everything perceivable to every perceiving one aka enacting towards reaction.

Do you think it's all the same, or different factions?

a) everything (process of dying) represents sameness, everyone within represents differentiation (living).

b) nature sets itself apart, hence from wholeness (process of dying) into apartheid (living). Living represents ones struggle to sustain apartheid while being dissolved back into wholeness.

c) the few represents apartheid (israel), while suggesting the many togetherness aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); e pluribus unum (out of many; one); equality (sameness) through diversity (difference); united nations; united states; european union; usmca (formerly nafta); uniformity; university; unilateral etc.

ISRA'EL; from SARA (contention; resistance) EL (god) aka partial (living) resisting whole (process of dying) to sustain apartheid within wholeness.

d) FAC'TION, noun [Latin factio, from facio, to make or do.] - "acting in union"...the few suggest the many to shape factions, as to tempt each one of them to ignore being the partial reaction (living) within the enacting whole (process of dying).

One cannot "make"; only RE (respond to) MAKE (being made by). One cannot "do"; only RE (respond to) DO (being done by). Others can suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death).

If one consents to suggested "actors", then the perceiving one (life) ignores to "react" to the perceivable direction (inception towards death) inspiring one to resist.

reject hedonism and materialism

Accepting (want) or rejecting (not want) any suggested -ISM, tempts one to ignore adaptation (need) to perceivable, while resisting suggested temptation (want).

Aren't the secular Jews the more Socialist ones?

SO'CIAL, adjective [Latin socialis, from socius, companion.] - "the publice as an aggregate body"...the few suggest socialism (togetherness) to tempt the consenting many to ignore perceivable apartheid (aka being partial within whole).

If each "one" of the many ignores to represent free will of choice within perceivable; for consenting to the suggested choices of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection; choice".

In short...being one (apart from others) contradicts being social (togetherness). Suggested society represents the domestication of each "ones" free will of choice to follow the suggested choices of the few, hence CHATTEL, noun - "movable goods" slavery by consent of the (freehold) cattle aka those with "free" will of choice.

talmud

TALMUD (instruction) for MiSHNAH (perceivable inspiration) + GEMARA (suggested information)...it represents ones free will of choice to resist want (suggested) for need (perceivable). That implies the want to be instructed by a book suggested by others, which tempts one to be bound (contract law) by volume (book) to the choices of others.

It's not about what's written in any book, but about the what the composition of form within flow implies...nature doesn't use words to communicate itself. The few suggest words (information) to tempt the many to ignore sound (inspiration).

Those adapting to sound represent PHONETICIANS, from PHON'ICS, noun [Gr. sound.] , while those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words are controlled by "definitions", hence representing DEAF PHONETICIANS. This is called spell-craft.