Yawn you are so fucking retarded.
Who cares when he later, centuries, inserted Christ's assumed birth year. It happened to fall on a millennium. So it is wrong. It wasn't historically adopted globally until what point you freaking retarded sack of human excrement.
Why was it? It has nothing to do with Christ either. Nothing at all. It is a much larger conspiracy on claiming that period of record, being those record holders and therefore writing history, and faster destroying all other records.
Nobody on the planet, globally, referred to that millennium as AD, until much later. Everybody living then would've called it what they did. It wasn't the start or end of anything else. Today it is. It means everything before it has a use by date of a few thousand years. Because they were monkeys and civilization didn't exist despite the records.
You freaking dumb cunt, quoting me Google. You're literally autistic. Cannot add things up. Just want to tell me I'm wrong. No I am not. It wasn't adopted until much later on. Despite some monk inserting it into the timeline. And it is wrong. Christ wasn't born on the millennium. Neither was Caesar.
If the obvious conspiracy on the timeline is wrong. What is correct topically?
Yawn you are so fucking retarded.
Who cares when he later, centuries inserted Christ's assumed birth year. It happened to fall on a millennium. So it is wrong. It wasn't historically adopted globally until what point you freaking retarded sack of human excrement.
Why was it? It has nothing to do with Christ either. Nothing at all. It is a much larger conspiracy on claiming that period of record, being those record holders and therefore writing history, and faster destroying all other records.
Nobody on the planet, globally, referred to that millennium as AD, until much later. Everybody living then would've called it what they did. It wasn't the start or end of anything else. Today it is. It means everything before it has a use by date of a few thousand years. Because they were monkeys and civilization didn't exist despite the records.
You freaking dumb cunt, quoting me Google. You're literally autistic. Cannot add things up. Just want to tell me I'm wrong. No I am not. It wasn't adopted until much later on. Despite some monk inserting it into the timeline. And it is wrong. Christ wasn't born on the millennium. Neither was Caesar.
If the obvious conspiracy on the timeline is wrong. What is correct topically?
Yawn you are so fucking retarded.
Who cares when he later, centuries inserted Christ's assumed birth year. It happened to fall on a millennium. So it is wrong. It wasn't historically adopted globally until what point you freaking retarded sack of human excrement.
Why was it? It has nothing to do with Christ either. Nothing at all. It is a much larger conspiracy on claiming that period of record, being those record holders and therefore writing history, and faster destroying all other records.
Nobody on the planet, globally, referred to that millennium as AD, until much later. Everybody living then would've called it what they did. It wasn't the start or end of anything else. Today it is. It means everything before it has a use by date of a few thousand years. Because they were monkeys and civilization didn't exist despite the records.
You freaking dumb cunt, quoting me Google. You're literally autistic. Cannot add things up. Just want to tell me I'm wrong. No I am not. It wasn't adopted until much later on. Despite some monk inserting it into the timeline. And it is wrong. Christ wasn't born on the millennium. Neither was Caesar.
Yawn you are so fucking retarded.
Who cares when he later, centuries inserted Christ's assumed birth year. It happened to fall on a millennium. So it is wrong. It wasn't historically adopted globally until what point you freaking retarded sack of human excrement.
Why was it? It has nothing to do with Christ either. Nothing at all. It is a much larger conspiracy on claiming that period of record, being those record holders and therefore writing history, and faster destroying all other records.
Nobody on the planet, globally, referred to that millennium as AD, until much later. Everybody living then would've called it what they did. It wasn't the start or end of anything else. Today it is. It means everything before it has a use by date of a few thousand years. Because they were monkeys and civilization didn't exist despite the records.
You freaking dumb cunt, quoting me Google. You're literally autistic. Cannot add things up. Just want to tell me I'm wrong. No I am not. It wasn't adopted until much later on. Despite some monk inserting it into the timeline. And it is wrong. Chris wasn't born on the millennium. Neither was Caesar.
Yawn you are so fucking retarded.
Who cares when he later, centuries inserted Christ's assumed birth year. It happened to fall on a millennium. So it is wrong. It wasn't historically adopted globally until what point you freaking retarded sack of human excrement.
Why was it? It has nothing to do with Christ either. Nothing at all. It is a much larger conspiracy on claiming that period of record, being those record holders and therefore writing history, and faster destroying all other records.
Nobody on the planet, globally, referred to that millennium as AD, until much later. Everybody living then would've called it what they did. It wasn't the start or end of anything else. Today it is. It means everything before it has a use by date of a few thousand years. Because they were monkeys and civilization didn't exist despite the records.