materialist

positivist

It's sad that you can't have an adult discussion without making up dumb names for your opposition. This shows weakness.

Witness testimony is evidence

No, it's not. Eyewitness testimony has often been viewed as the surest route to assuring convictions in criminal proceedings, yet this type of testimony is also often viewed as questionable, unreliable, and even invalid. It's most often used in conjunction with physical evidence and rarely, if ever used on it's own in a court of law. You are ignorant of the facts of how courts and evidence work.

you're being willingly obtuse, and think snark is logic.

Oh, the irony of this statement!

What is the definition of a demon?

A fictional character in children's stories... i.e. The Bible.

EDIT: Also, I see that you willfully ignored this massive fact I dropped on your head:

NONE of the people who supposedly wrote the gospels claim to be eye witnesses (some were written as many as 70 years after Jesus supposedly died). Even if they did, they could have been lying. No proof they existed either.

So, what was that about "being willingly obtuse"? LOL

Again, offer up your hard evidence or admit that you don't have any and that you simply believe this nonsense because you want to and not because you have been compelled to by the evidence....

materialist

positivist

It's sad that you can't have an adult discussion without making up dumb names for your opposition. This shows weakness.

Witness testimony is evidence

No, it's not. Eyewitness testimony has often been viewed as the surest route to assuring convictions in criminal proceedings, yet this type of testimony is also often viewed as questionable, unreliable, and even invalid. It's most often used in conjunction with physical evidence and rarely, if ever used on it's own in a court of law. You are ignorant of the facts of how courts and evidence work.

you're being willingly obtuse, and think snark is logic.

Oh, the irony of this statement!

What is the definition of a demon?

A fictional character in children's stories... i.e. The Bible.

EDIT: Also, I see that you willfully ignored this massive fact I dropped on your head:

NONE of the people who supposedly wrote the gospels claim to be eye witnesses (some were written as many as 70 years after Jesus supposedly died). Even if they did, they could have been lying. No proof they existed either.

materialist

positivist

It's sad that you can't have an adult discussion without making up dumb names for your opposition. This shows weakness.

Witness testimony is evidence

No, it's not. Eyewitness testimony has often been viewed as the surest route to assuring convictions in criminal proceedings, yet this type of testimony is also often viewed as questionable, unreliable, and even invalid. It's most often used in conjunction with physical evidence and rarely, if ever used on it's own in a court of law. You are ignorant of the facts of how courts and evidence work.

you're being willingly obtuse, and think snark is logic.

Oh, the irony of this statement!

What is the definition of a demon?

A fictional character in children's stories... i.e. The Bible.

What is the definition of a demon?

A fictional character in children's stories... i.e. The Bible.