Wtf. No there isn't by highest capital comparisons and density. Not by the same populations.

You also named 3 countries previously, probably counting them all as China. Hell Tehran is higher, Kabul is higher, Yemen, big city higher, then your bullshit. You never named Bhutan either. It is way up there.

We are again for elevation's sake suggesting total population evelated above significant existenial sea level rise for the sake of elevation. It provides us with as a claim of the highest elevation. Not summit. Because it has the most people residing at elevation. Providing us with an argument. No it's not the closest point to the stars.

The closest point to the stars is the summit in Ecuador, not Everest. It is densely elevated as a country. But the highest point in the World at elevation is Bolivia as the populated area, and as the majority of its country. But does it have as much population elevated? No. Where is this? But it is no wonder these people worshipped what they did. Why did those Incas chase the stars. They put their temples on the highest peaks. Many suffered climate changes in their attempts at the divine.

Yes the Steppes of Asia is massively elevated but those populations are all quite small. Africa has far more countries with cities at higher elevation. Bhutan very high has a relatively tiny population. Nepal isn't as high up as its summits of Everest and K2. Again it has a relatively small population by other comparisons. Even India has higher claims or areas of population in those peaks, but it isn't the vast majority of its population

Yawn you're so tedious.

What are you babbling about the NWO for?

We were talking about glacial melt. Before you opened your dumb mouth. How Ethiopia is no longer Frozen, and it has specks of snow on its tallest peaks, these in the past were frozen, glaciers, the source of the Nile. And would you look at Switzerland today, those glaciers are faster retreating. It has significantly warmed. Because go on. The Sun. It was shining long before people escaped the Romans.

Wtf. No there isn't by highest capital comparisons and density. Not by the same populations.

You also named 3 countries previously, probably counting them all as China. Hell Tehran is higher, Kabul is higher, Yemen, big city higher, then your bullshit. You never named Bhutan either. It is way up there.

We are again for elevation's sake suggesting total population evelated above significant existenial sea level rise for the sake of elevation. It provides us with as a claim of the highest elevation. Not summit. Because it has the most people residing at elevation. Providing us with an argument. No it's not the closest point to the stars.

The closest point to the stars is the summit in Ecuador, not Everest. It is densely elevated as a country. But the highest point in the World at elevation is Bolivia as the populated area and as a country. But does it have as much population elevated? No. Where is this? It is no wonder these people worshipped what they did. Why did those Incas chase this. They put their temples on the highest peaks. Many suffered climate changes in their attempts at the divine.

Yes the Steppes of Asia is massively elevated but those populations are all quite small. Bhutan has a relatively tiny population. Nepal isn't as high up as its summits of Everest and K2. Again it has a relatively small population by other comparisons. Even India has higher claims or areas of population in those peaks, but it isn't the vast majority of its population

Yawn you're so tedious.

What are you babbling about the NWO for?

We were talking about glacial melt. Before you opened your dumb mouth. How Ethiopia is no longer Frozen, and it has specks of snow on its tallest peaks, these in the past were frozen, glaciers, the source of the Nile, and would you look at Switzerland today, those glaciers are faster retreating. It has significantly warmed. Because go on. The Sun. It was shining long before people escaped the Romans.