Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

But there is.

The problem with climate change is population. No, I am not regurgitating the WEF. When weather hits, any normal weather; hurricane, typhoon, flooding, fire, snow. What happens on a densely populated globe. Extreme weather does. It hits far more people worse. There are far more of them. Genius right. Easy exploiting that narrative. If you throw in a few more mediums solar, and conjunctions presto. Not quite. Humans affect ecosystems and habitat changing it, causing weather change. Try it, build on the faultine, go on and frack on it. If they deforest and deplete ground water what happens. Drought. Wildfires. If they build where there are hurricanes, volcanoes, and right next to rivers? Climate change.

Now suddenly in a blink, add billions of population. Overnight. Last century 2.5 billion, and it took thousands and thousands of years to reach, suddenly in 100 years it is now 8 billion. All those people suddenly and rapidly changing ecosystems and habitat, affecting have a guess.

Nobody can gauge it, other than it will affect far more in increasing extremes. And freaking electricity won't change a thing. But it's profit off another means of consumption and control. It seemingly also presumes to start halting overpopulation by changing methods. I doubt the weather gives a shit. It is due its own course.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

But there is.

The problem with climate change is population. No, I am not regurgitating the WEF. When weather hits, any normal weather; hurricane, typhoon, flooding, fire, snow. What happens on a densely populated globe. Extreme weather does. It hits far more people worse. There are far more of them. Genuis right. Easy exploiting that narrative. If you throw in a few more mediums solar, and conjunctions presto. Not quite. Humans affect ecosystems and habitat changing it, causing weather change. Try it, build on the faultine, go on and frack on it. If they deforest and deplete ground water what happens. Drought. Wildfires. If they build where there are hurricanes, volcanoes, and right next to rivers? Climate change.

Now suddenly in a blink, add billions of population. Overnight. Last century 2.5 billion, and it took thousands and thousands of years to reach, suddenly in 100 years it is now 8 billion. All those people suddenly and rapidly changing ecosystems and habitat, affecting have a guess.

Nobody can gauge it, other than it will affect far more in increasing extremes. And freaking electricity won't change a thing. But it's profit off another means of consumption and control. It seemingly also presumes to start halting overpopulation by changing methods. I doubt the weather gives a shit. It is due its own course.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

But there is.

The problem with climate change is population. No, I am not regurgitating the WEF. When weather hits, any normal weather; hurricane, typhoon, flooding, fire, snow. What happens on a densely populated globe. Extreme weather does. It hits far more people worse. There are far more of them. Genuis right. Easy exploiting that narrative. If you throw in a few more mediums solar, and conjunctions presto. Not quite Humans affect ecosystems and habitat changing it, causing weather change. Try it build on the faultine, go on frack on it. If they deforest and deplete ground water what happens. Drought. Wildfires. If they build where there are hurricanes, volcanoes, and right next to rivers?

Now suddenly in a blink add billions of population. Overnight. Last century 2.5 billion and it took thousands and thousands of years to reach, suddenly in 100 years it is now 8 billion, all those people suddenly and rapidly changing ecosystems and habitat, affecting have a guess.

Nobody can gauge it other than it will affect far more in increasing extremes. And freaking electricity won't change a thing. But it's profit off another means of consumption and control. It seemingly also presumes to start halting overpopulation by changing methods. I doubt the weather gives a shit. It is due its own course.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

But there is.

The problem with climate change is population. No, I am not regurgitating the WEF. When weather hits, any normal weather; hurricane, typhoon, flooding, fire, snow. What happens on a densely populated globe. Extreme weather does. It hits far more people worse. There are far more of them. Genuis right. Easy exploiting that narrative. If you throw in a few more mediums solar, and conjunctions presto. Not quite Humans affect ecosystems and habitat changing it, causing weather change. Try it build on the faultine, go on frack on it. If they deforest and deplete ground water what happens. Drought. Wildfires. If they build where there are hurricanes, volcanoes, and right next to rivers?

Now suddenly in a blink add billions of population. Overnight. Last century 2.5 billion and it took thousands and thousands of years to reach, suddenly in 100 years it is now 8 billion, all those people suddenly and rapidly changing ecosystems and habitat, affecting have a guess.

Nobody can gauge it other than it will affect far more in increasing extremes. And freaking electricity won't change a thing.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

But there is.

The problem with climate change is population. No, I am not regurgitating the WEF. When weather hits, any normal weather; hurricane, typhoon, flooding, fire, snow. What happens on a densely populated globe. Extreme weather does. It hits far more people worse. There are far more of them. Genuis right. Easy exploiting that narrative. If you throw in a few more mediums solar, and conjunctions presto. Not quite Humans affect ecosystems and habitat changing it, causing weather change. Try it build on the faultine, go on frack on it. If they deforest and deplete ground water what happens. Drought. Wildfires. If they build where there are hurricanes, volcanoes, and right next to rivers?

Now suddenly in a blink add billions of population. Overnight. Last century 2.5 billion and it took thousands and thousands of years to reach, suddenly in 100 years it is now 8 billion, all those people suddenly and rapidly changing ecosystems and habitat, affecting have a guess.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

But there is.

The problem with climate change is population. No, I am not regurgitating the WEF. When weather hits, any normal weather; hurricane, typhoon, flooding, fire, snow. What happens on a densely populated globe. Extreme weather does. It hits far more people worse. There are far more of them. Genuis right. Easy exploiting that narrative. If you throw in a few more mediums solar, and conjunctions presto. Not quite Humans affect ecosystems and habitat changing it, causing weather change. Try it build on the faultine, go on frack on it. If they deforest and deplete ground water what happens. Drought. Wildfires. If they build where there are hurricanes, right next to rivers?

2 years ago
1 score