None.

There's no Peace Deal.

Americans, Nato don't even recognise the Crimea as a Russian territory. The reason for this is because the Crimea represents almost 2/3s of the Ukrainian coastline, and the surrounding claim it has to territorial waters. With the Oblasts of Dontesk and Luhansk, separatist regions, the majority of the coastline has virtually evaporated. After addressing the above, the Crimea requires fresh water, and it largely gains it from the rivers and Oblast directly above it. For the Crimea to be secure, not having Ukrainian build up in the form of a Ukrainian Navy or troops near to it, Russia has targeted the reamaning coastline, without Odesa failing yet.

What deal will secure peace? Any deal was rejected at the beginning stages of the war. It was a better offer than it can be bartered for today. Another two oblasts are separatist as well as the original two, since. Ukraine will never deal for a insignificant fraction of its coastline now almost fully under Russia control with critical coastal islands fully under Russian control.

The only peace an unpopular president can make, is a Russian victory of more separation territory. No president committed to Ukrainian armament could ever make that deal. It would be political suicide. Congress currently wouldn't even agree to it. They granted arms to the Ukraine. Nato unlike the USA president wouldn't agree to it either, currently all of its members are also funding Ukrainian armament

This war could drag on for much longer, it has the potential to drag, indefinitely. Many conflicts last for years and years. Syria is still in conflict. Libya. Etc etc. However as this conflict does, it escalates, if it gets bigger, it risks more much more than peace.

No, Barry is not the president to deliver it. And when there's another agenda of change, and in particular energy independence, it is serving a geopolitical agenda where it seeks to isolate Russia from those oil and gas markets, and it means no permament peace.

None.

There's no Peace Deal.

Americans, Nato don't even recognise the Crimea as a Russian territory. The reason for this is because the Crimea represents almost 2/3s of the Ukrainian coastline and the surrounding claim is has to territorial waters. With the Oblasts of Dontesk and Luhansk, separatist regions the majority of the coastline has virtually evaporated. After addressing the above, the Crimea requires fresh water, and it largely gains it from the rivers and Oblast directly above it. For the Crimea to be secure, not having Ukrainian build up in the form of a Ukrainian Navy or troops near to it, Russia has targeted the reamaning coastline, without Odesa failing yet.

What deal will secure peace? Any deal was rejected at the beginning stages of the war. It was a better offer than it can be bartered for today. Another two oblasts are separatist as well as the original two, since. Ukraine will never deal for a insignificant fraction of its coastline now almost fully under Russia control with critical coastal islands fully under Russian control.

The only peace an unpopular president can make, is a Russian victory of more separation territory. No president committed to Ukrainian armament could ever make that deal. It would be political suicide. Congress currently wouldn't even agree to it. They granted arms to the Ukraine. Nato unlike the USA president wouldn't agree to it either, currently all of its members are also funding Ukrainian armament

This war could drag on for much longer, it has the potential to drag, indefinitely. Many conflicts last for years and years. Syria is still in conflict. Libya. Etc etc. However as this conflict does, it escalates, if it gets bigger, it risks more much more than peace.

No Barry is not the president to deliver it. And when there's another agenda of change, and in particular energy independence, it is serving a geopolitical agenda where it seeks to isolate Russia from those oil and gas markets, and it means no permament peace.

None.

There's no Peace Deal.

Americans, Nato don't even recognise the Crimea as a Russian territory. The reason for this is because the Crimea represents almost 2/3s of the Ukrainian coastline and the surrounding claim is has to territorial waters. With the Oblasts of Dontesk and Luhansk, separatist regions the majority of the coastline has virtually evaporated. After addressing the above the Crimea requires fresh water, it largely gains from the rivers and Oblast directly above it, for it to be secure not having Ukrainian build up in the form of a Ukrainian Navy or troops near to the Crimea, it has targeted the reamaning coastline, without Odesa failing yet.

What deal will secure peace? Any deal was rejected at the beginning stages of the war. It was a better offer than it can be bartered for today. Another two oblasts are separatist as well as the original two. Ukraine will never deal for a insignificant fraction of its coastline now almost fully under Russia control with critical coastal islands fully under Russian control.

The only peace an unpopular president can make, is a Russian victory of more separation territory. No president committed to Ukrainian armament could ever make. It would be a political suicide. Congress currently wouldn't even agree to it. They granted arms to the Ukraine. Nato unlike the USA president wouldn't agree to it either currently all its members funding Ukrainian armament

This war could drag on for much longer, it has the potential to drag, indefinitely. Many conflicts last for years and years. Syria is still in conflict. Libya. Etc etc. However as this conflict does it escalates, if it gets bigger it risks more much more than peace.

No Barry is not the president to deliver it. And when there's another agenda of change, and in particular energy independence, it is serving a geopolitical agenda where it seeks to isolate Russia from those oil and gas markets, and it means no permament peace.

None.