It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently but they have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, while some withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested as quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than any arms funding is working, Russia is losing, that narrative has been repeated from the start of this war. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested, Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimea. Then its highly probable, and much sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it, if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement by the West, it would provoke the public against it. If Biden said he'd nuke Russia because it nuked Ukraine, and if Nato said they'd nuke Russia, because Russia nuked Ukraine, nobody sane would want that involvement.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, then tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it, then it won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into this war, it will potentially continue for longer, before nukes could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed, well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Especially if upon surrounding and isolating as example Kherson, or potentially other key ground in the North East. Obviously that clip wants to prompt everything, so his counter offensive will succeed where it in fact could only get nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet or likewise.

Speculating on the probability of it, the odds are almost certain nukes will be deployed on the provision Ukraine force a complete Russian withdrawal. The odds Ukraine forces Russian withdrawal are far less.

What's more concerning in this conflict is any risk increases. Not only that risk, but any response to it, hasn't been public. It simply shrugs it off with, it could occur. While emphatically claiming Ukraine will force Russian withdrawal.

It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently but they have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, while some withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested as quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than any arms funding is working, Russia is losing, that narrative has been repeated from the start of this war. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested, Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimea. Then its highly probable, and much sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it, if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement by the West, it would provoke the public against it. If Biden said he'd nuke Russia because it nuked Ukraine, and if Nato said they'd nuke Russia, because Russia nuked Ukraine, nobody sane would want that involvement.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, then tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it, then it won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into it this war, it potentially will continue for longer before it could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed. Well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Obviously he that clip wants to prompt everything, so his counter offensive will succeed where it infact could only get nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet.

Speculating on the probability of it, the odds are almost certain nukes will be deployed on the provision Ukraine force a complete Russian withdrawal. The odds Ukraine forces Russian withdrawal are far less.

What's more concerning in this conflict is any risk increases. Not only that risk, but any response to it, hasn't been public. It simply shrugs it off with, it could occur. While emphatically claiming Ukraine will force Russian withdrawal.

It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently but they have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, while some withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested as quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than any arms funding is working, Russia is losing, that narrative has been repeated from the start of this war. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested, Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimea. Then its highly probable, and much sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it, if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement by the West, it would provoke the public against it. If Biden said he'd nuke Russia because it nuked Ukraine, and if Nato said they'd nuke Russia, because Russia nuked Ukraine, nobody sane would want that involvement.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, then tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it, then it won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into it this war, it potentially will continue for longer before it could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed. Well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Obviously he that clip wants to prompt everything, so his counter offensive will succeed where it infact could only gonna nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet.

Speculating on the probability of it, the odds are almost certain nukes will be deployed on the provision Ukraine force a complete Russian withdrawal. The odds Ukraine forces Russian withdrawal are far less.

What's more concerning in this conflict is any risk increases. Not only that risk, but any response to it, hasn't been public. It simply shrugs it off with, it could occur. While emphatically claiming Ukraine will force Russian withdrawal.

It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently but they have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, while some withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested as quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than any arms funding is working, Russia is losing, that narrative has been repeated from the start of this war. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested, Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimea. Then its highly probable, and much sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it, if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement by the West, it would provoke the public against it. If Biden said he'd nuke Russia because it nuked Ukraine, and if Nato said they'd nuke Russia, because Russia nuked Ukraine, nobody sane would want that involvement.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, then tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it, then it won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into it this war, it potentially will continue for longer before it could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed. Well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Obviously he that clip wants to prompt everything, so his counter offensive will succeed where it infact could only gonna nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet.

Speculating on the probability of it, the odds are almost certain nukes will be deployed on the provision Ukraine force a complete Russian withdrawal. The odds Ukraine forces Russian withdrawal are far less.

What's more concerning in this conflict is any risk increases. Not only that risk, but any response to it, hasn't been public. It simply shrugs it off with, it could occur. While emphatically claiming Ukraine will force Russian withdrawal.

What is that conclusion? It seems pointless.

It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently but they have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, while some withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested as quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than any arms funding is working, Russia is losing, that narrative has been repeated from the start of this war. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested, Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimea. Then its highly probable, and much sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it, if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement by the West, it would provoke the public against it. If Biden said he'd nuke Russia because it nuked Ukraine, and if Nato said they'd nuke Russia, because Russia nuked Ukraine, nobody sane would want that involvement.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, then tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it, then it won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into it this war, it potentially will continue for longer before it could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed. Well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Obviously he that clip wants to prompt everything, so his counter offensive will succeed where it infact could only gonna nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet.

Speculating on the probability of it, the odds are almost certain nukes will be deployed on the provision Ukraine force a complete Russian withdrawal. The odds Ukraine forces Russian withdrawal are far less.

It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently but they have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, while some withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested as quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than any arms funding is working, Russia is losing, that narrative has been repeated from the start of this war. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested, Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimea. Then its highly probable, and much sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it, if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement by the West, it would provoke the public against it. If Biden said he nuke Russia because it nuked Ukraine, and if Nato said they'd nuke Russia, because Russia nuked Ukraine, nobody sane would want that involvement.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, then tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it, then it won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into it this war, it potentially will continue for longer before it could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed. Well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Obviously he that clip wants to prompt everything, so his counter offensive will succeed where it infact could only gonna nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet.

Speculating on the probability of it, the odds are almost certain nukes will be deployed on the provision Ukraine force a complete Russian withdrawal. The odds Ukraine forces Russian withdrawal are far less.

It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently but they have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, while some withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested as quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than any arms funding is working, Russia is losing, that narrative has been repeated from the start of this war. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested, Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimea. Then its highly probable, and much sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement by the West, it would provoke the public against it. If Biden said he nuke Russia because it nuked Ukraine, and if Nato said they'd nuke Russia, because Russia nuked Ukraine, nobody sane would want that involvement.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, then tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it, then it won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into it this war, it potentially will continue for longer before it could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed. Well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Obviously he that clip wants to prompt everything, so his counter offensive will succeed where it infact could only gonna nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet.

Speculating on the probability of it, the odds are almost certain nukes will be deployed on the provision Ukraine force a complete Russian withdrawal. The odds Ukraine forces Russian withdrawal are far less.

It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently but they have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, while some withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested as quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than any arms funding is working, Russia is losing, that narrative has been repeated from the start of this war. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested, Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimea. Then its highly probable, and much sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement by the West, it would provoke the public against it. If Biden said he nuke Russia because it Ukraine, and if Nato said they'd nuke Russia because Russia nuked Ukraine, nobody sane would want that involvement.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, then tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it, then it won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into it this war, it potentially will continue for longer before it could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed. Well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Obviously he wants to prompt everything so his counter offensive will succeed where it infact could only gonna nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet.

It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently but they have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, while some withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested as quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than any arms funding is working, Russia is losing, that narrative has been repeated from the start of this war. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested, Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimea. Then its highly probable, and much sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement by the West, it would provoke the public against it. If Biden said he nuke Russia because it Ukraine. If Nato said they nuke Russia because Russia nuked Ukraine. Nobody sane would want that involvement.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it. It won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into it this war, it potentially will continue for longer before it could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed. Well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Obviously he wants to prompt everything so his counter offensive will succeed where it infact could only gonna nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet.

It is everywhere. I don't know what you're watching.

Watching the news recently almost every military advisor has suggested it's almost a certainty. If Ukraine advance at the rate they are. It isn't much currently butter have an advancing advantage where gains are being made into territory named by Russia, whil a withdrawal occurs. It's being suggested quite likely. However it hasn't accounted for much more than funding is working, Russia is losing narrative from the start. Tactics often play out different on an active battlefield especially as winter sets in. However if what is being suggested that Ukraine retakes all of its territory including the Crimes. Then its highly probable, and mych sooner. But they're not certain of that response, most disagree on it if it happened, what would happen. There is no certainly there. But that's also because speculating on it is pointless. If they suggested involvement, it would provoke public more against it.

In short it is certain if Ukraine retakes most of the present territory under Russian referendum. But it's quite likely it will happen more urgently to that, tactical nukes could be deployed. But this opinion hasn't accounted for the fact it is absolutely unlikely Ukraine will retake all of its terrority. Even if it takes a part of it. It won't necessarily draw that kind of strike. It's a possibility. But as mobilisation brings far more into it this war, it potentially will continue for longer before it could occur.. Although if a counter offensive blitzed. Well who knows.

Ukraine is also fully aware of this danger. Obviously he wants to prompt everything so his counter offensive will succeed where it infact could only gonna nuked. I know I know nuke zee Russia first. Yea nope. Not there yet.