Dunno.

There's an obvious agenda to cause change. There always is.

But there is also the distinct chance of nuclear weapons. I don't understand if peace is possible without them. I don't understand how that bluff will keep raising their stakes without their use. If they aren't used. How can a population keep paying for their protection and deterrent. It is nothing more then a bluff.

At this point I would suggest there is no peace, until that inevitability. This war will continue to escalation.Then what, they agree not to use them. Hahaha. No. There is no peace and no chance of it until surrender, or loser. Or another means causes the war to stop, disaster, change of policy, arms shipments stopped. Improbable that policy has committed. War is the disaster. Economic collapse doesn't really affect a mobilised population it is under emergency conscription and in a self-sustaining nation less so.

So when do they deal and for what? Russia can't technically lose with nukes. Does the West pull funding. No chance of it currently. It cannot technically let Russia win.

Dunno.

There's an obvious agenda to cause change. There always is.

But there is also the distinct chance of nuclear weapons. I don't understand if peace is possible without them. I don't understand how that bluff will keep raising their stakes without their use. If they aren't used. How can a population keep paying for their protection and deterrent. It is nothing more then a bluff.

At this point I would suggest there is no peace, until that inevitability. This war will continue to escalation.Then what, they agree not to use them. Hahaha. No. There is no peace and no chance of it until surrender, or loser. Or another means causes the war to stop, disaster, change of policy, arms shipments stopped. Improbable that policy has committed. War is the disaster. Economic collapse doesn't really affect a mobilised population it is under emergency conscription and in a self-sustaining nation less so.

Dunno.

There's an obvious agenda to cause change. There always is.

But there is also the distinct chance of nuclear weapons. I don't understand if peace is possible without them. I don't understand how that bluff will keep raising their stakes without their use. If they aren't used. How can a population keep paying for their protection and deterrent. It is nothing more then a bluff.

At this point I would suggest there is no peace, until that inevitability. This war will continue to escalation.Then what, they agree not to use them. Hahaha. No. There is no peace and no chance of it until surrender, or loser. Or another means causes the war to stop, disaster, change of policy, arms shipments stopped. Improbable that policy has committed. War is the disaster.