I was talking about the stars of the constellations in relation to how they are spaced amongst eachother. Their spacing appears to be the same because the ancients depicted them exactly as they are today. Even if you want to argue they this spacing has altered slightly in thousands of years this seems completely implausible considering the universe is expanding at incomprehensible speeds according to the big bang theory. And we have no way of going back in time to check these measurements.

I am speaking out the scope of my research with this next speculation, but it is my understanding that we are currently transitioning from the age of Pisces to the age of Aquarius. Each of these ages last about 2156 years, both heliocentric and flat earth models agree on this. Is it possible the zodiac constellations shift slowly to different months through the ages? Just speculation, but I have not seen convincing evidence the stars shift in their spacing relative to eachother over any period of time.

I was talking about the stars of the constellations in relation to how they are spaced amongst eachother. Their spacing appears to be the same because the ancients depicted them exactly as they are today. Even if you want to argue they this spacing has altered slightly in thousands of years this seems completely implausible considering the universe is expanding at incomprehensible speeds according to the big bang theory. And we have no way of going back in time to check these measurements.

I am speaking out the scope of my research with this next speculation, but it is my understanding that we are currently transitioning from the age of Pisces to the age of Aquarius. Each of these ages last about 2156 years, both heliocentric and flat earth models agree on this. Is it possible the zodiac constellations shift slowly to different months through the ages? Just speculation, but I have not seen convincing evidence the stars shift in their spacing relative to eachother over any period of time.