Losing, what? Losing, where?

People always lose. I might agree. They aren't a nation with national interests. Today they aren't the necessary national interests, because they are more concerned about the status quo offering another stage of prosperity.

But look they are sooner. Because like a tap. It becomes, when it's necessary, providing agenda.

A collapse occurs. When it does how do nations rally. It becomes very debatable what that means.

Inciting and enlisting change. Sooner nationalising any systems failing, forcing them into the next methods. They need national support, and achieving this often requires a collapse. Or any change prompted doesn't occur, or quickly.

Or worse, rallying for conflict. Again for any support, it requires a population incited, nobody demands conflict unless they've exhausted the current means. It ain't peace. But rather another edge forcing support. And those means simply retain power when influence fails.

Look at how unpopular and what failures they've become. But don't worry and on cue somebody will nationalise their populations in protest.

Can't quite think of how yet. But you're led and always will be.

Losing, what? Losing, where?

People always lose. I might agree. They aren't a nation with national interests. Today they aren't the necessary national interests, they were more concerned about the status quo offering another stage of prosperity.

But look they are sooner. Because like a tap. It becomes, when it's necessary, providing agenda.

A collapse occurs. When it does how do nations rally. It becomes very debatable what it is.

Inciting and enlisting change. Sooner nationalising any systems failing, forcing them into the next methods. They need national support, and achieving this often requires a collapse. Or any change prompted doesn't occur quickly.

Or worse, rallying for conflict. Again for any support, it requires a population incited, nobody demands conflict unless they've exhausted the current means. It ain't peace. But rather another edge forcing support. And those means simply retain power when influence fails.

Look at how unpopular and what failures they've become. But don't worry and on cue somebody will nationalise their populations in protest.

Can't quite think of how yet. But you're led and always will be.

Losing, what? Losing, where?

People always lose. I might agree. They aren't a nation with national interests. Today they aren't the necessary national interests, they were more concerned about the status quo offering another stage of prosperity.

But look they are sooner. Because like a tap. It becomes, when it's necessary, providing agenda.

A collapse occurs. When it does how do nations rally. It becomes very debatable what it is.

Inciting and enlisting change. Sooner nationalising any systems failing, forcing them into the next methods. They need national support, and achieving this often requires a collapse. Or any change prompted doesn't occur quickly.

Or worse, rallying for conflict. Again for any support, it requires a population incited, nobody demands conflict unless they've exhausted the current means. Those means simply retain power when influence fails.

Look at how unpopular and what failures they've become. But don't worry and on cue somebody will nationalise their populations in protest.

Can't quite think of how yet. But you're led and always will be.

Losing, what? Losing, where?

People always lose. I might agree. They aren't a nation with national interests. Today they aren't the necessary national interests, they were more concerned about the status quo offering another stage of prosperity.

But look they are sooner. Because like a tap. It becomes, when it's necessary, providing agenda.

A collapse occurs. When it does how do nations rally.It becomes very debatable what it is.

Inciting and enlisting change. Sooner nationalising any systems failing, forcing them into the next methods. They need national support, and achieving this often requires a collapse. Or any change prompted doesn't occur quickly.

Or worse, rallying for conflict. Again for any support, it requires a population incited, nobody demands conflict unless they've exhausted the current means. Those means simply retain power when influence fails.

Look at how unpopular and what failures they've become. But don't worry and on cue somebody will nationalise their populations in protest.

Can't quite think of how yet. But you're led and always will be.

Losing, what? Losing, where?

People always lose. I might agree. They aren't a nation with national interests. Today they aren't the necessary national interests, they were more concerned about the status quo offering another stage of prosperity.

But look they are sooner. Because like a tap. It becomes, when it's necessary, providing agenda. A collapse occurs. When it does how do nations rally.

It becomes very debatable what it is. Inciting and enlisting change. Sooner nationalising any systems failing, forcing them into the next methods. They need national support, and achieving this often requires a collapse. Or any change prompted doesn't occur quickly.

Or worse, rallying for conflict. Again for any support, it requires a population incited, nobody demands conflict unless they've exhausted the current means. Those means simply retain power when influence fails.

Look at how unpopular and what failures they've become. But don't worry and on cue somebody else will nationalise their population in protest.

Can't quite think of how yet. But you're led and always will be.

Losing, what? Losing, where?

People always lose. I might agree. They aren't a nation with national interests. Today they aren't the necessary national interests, they were more concerned about the status quo offering another stage of prosperity.

But look they are sooner. Because like a tap. It becomes, when it's necessary, providing agenda.

It becomes very debatable what it is. Inciting and enlisting change. Sooner nationalising any systems failing, forcing them into the next methods. They need national support, achieving this often requires a collapse.

Or worse, rallying for conflict. Again for any support, it requires a failure, nobody demands conflict unless they've exhausted the current means. Those means simply retain power when influence fails.

But you're led and always will be.