Thanks, but you should stop believing in photos from space. High altitude planes

Show me a plane that could fly 7.5km/s at alsitude 800km or in case of geostationary at 3km/s at 35000km. And only then come back.

Go ahead, Measure the curve. 8 inches per mile squared, convert to metric or use the trig chart.

I'm fucking with that fucking 8 inches per mile each time when I have to establish long-range radiolink between two points. All that fucking masts and roofs to go above that fucking curvature. Oh, how I want the Earth be flat - put antennas above the trees, and get unlimited range. But no, that fucking Earth is round as fuck, and you have to build high towers and masts for fucking miserable 30km.

So, don't even try to tell me about how you can't measure Earth curvature.

Shut the fuck up, take a laser and go to lake or river and measure your curvature as long as you wish. Also, you could measure distances using any long-range ToF device between 3 distant points and sum the angles of measured triangle. Suddenly, you will inevitably get more than 180°.

Either way, you cant use pictures to prove the globe theory.

I can. It is you who can't find out anything by yourself and continously copypasting dumb shit.

You personally did absolutely nothing to find out the answer on the question you so concerned about. Why?

Thanks, but you should stop believing in photos from space. High altitude planes

Show me a plane that could fly 7.5km/s at alsitude 800km or in case of geostationary at 3km/s at 35000km. And only then come back.

Go ahead, Measure the curve. 8 inches per mile squared, convert to metric or use the trig chart.

I'm fucking with that fucking 8 inches per mile each time when I have to establish long-range radiolink between two points. All that fucking masts and roofs to go above that fucking curvature. Oh, how I want the Earth be flat - put antennas above the trees, and get unlimited range. But no, that fucking Earth is round as fuck, and you have to build high towers and masts for fucking miserable 30km.

So, don't even try to tell me about how you can't measure Earth curvature.

Shut the fuck up, take a laser and go to lake or river and measure your curvature as long as you wish. Also, you could measure distances using any long-range ToF device between 3 distant points and sum the angles of measured triangle. Suddenly, you will inevitably get more than 180°.

Either way, you cant use pictures to prove the globe theory.

I can. It is you who can't find out anything by yourself and continously copypasting dumb shit.

Thanks, but you should stop believing in photos from space. High altitude planes

Show me a palne that could fly 7.5km/s at alsitude 800km or in case of geostationary at 3km/s at 35000km. And only then come back.

Go ahead, Measure the curve. 8 inches per mile squared, convert to metric or use the trig chart.

I'm fuking with that fucking 8 inches per mile each time when I have to establish long-range radiolink between two points. All that fucking masts and roofs to go above that fucking curvature. Oh, how I want the Earth be flat - put antennas above the trees, and get unlimited range. But no, that fucking Earth is round as fuck, and you have to build high towers and masts for fucking miserable 30km.

So, don't even try to tell me about how you can't measure Earth curvature.

Shut the fuck up, take a laser and go to lake or river and measure your curvature as long as you wish. Also, you could measure distances using any long-range ToF device between 3 distant points and sum the angles of measured triangle. Suddenly, you will inevitably get more than 180°.

Either way, you cant use pictures to prove the globe theory.

I can. It is you who can't find out anything by yourself and continously copypasting dumb shit.

Thanks, but you should stop believing in photos from space. High altitude planes

Show me a palne that could fly 7.5km/s at alsitude 800km or in case of geostationary at 3km/s at 35000km. And only then come back.

Go ahead, Measure the curve. 8 inches per mile squared, convert to metric or use the trig chart.

I'm fuking with that fucking 8 inches per mile each time when I have to establish long-range radiolink between two points. All that fucking masts and roofs to go above that fucking curvature. Oh, how I want the Earth be flat - put antennas above the trees, and get unlimited range. But no, that fucking Earth are round as fuck, and you have to build high towers and masts for fucking miserable 30km.

So, don't even try to tell me about how you can't measure Earth curvature.

Shut the fuck up, take a laser and go to lake or river and measure your curvature as long as you wish. Also, you could measure distances using any long-range ToF device between 3 distant points and sum the angles of measured triangle. Suddenly, you will inevitably get more than 180°.

Either way, you cant use pictures to prove the globe theory.

I can. It is you who can't find out anything by yourself and continously copypasting dumb shit.

Thanks, but you should stop believing in photos from space. High altitude planes

Show me a palne that could fly 7.5km/s at alsitude 800km or in case of geostationary at 3km/s at 35000km. And only then come back.

Go ahead, Measure the curve. 8 inches per mile squared, convert to metric or use the trig chart.

I'm fuking with that fucking 8 inches per mile each time when I have to establish long-range radiolink between two points. All that fucking masts and roofs to go above that fucking curvature. Oh, how I want the Earth be flat - put antennas above the trees, and get unlimited range. But no, that fucking Earth are round as fuck, and you have to build high towers and masts for fucking miserable 30km.

So, don't even try to tell me about how you can't measure Earth curvature.

Either way, you cant use pictures to prove the globe theory.

I can. It is you who can't find out anything by yourself and continously copypasting dumb shit.