That's pretty interesting it's the Twyman page he says is responsible. I've actually always been a little surprised they maintain a page on her.

*I have a neutral to low opinion of Wikispooks. It can be pretty biased, shallowly researched, and unjustifiably dismissive on certain topics, once you dig a little deeper. *

it seems I may have been thinking of rational wiki when I wrote this comment rather than wikispooks - ie my opinion of rational wiki is low. Wikispooks seems alright actually

That's pretty interesting it's the Twyman page he says is responsible. I've actually always been a little surprised they maintain a page on her.

I have a neutral to low opinion of Wikispooks. It can be pretty biased, shallowly researched, and unjustifiably dismissive on certain topics, once you dig a little deeper.