Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

No, it's the source of the Old Testament.

Real simple where did Nehemiah come from. When Babylon was destroyed by Persia the refugees were supposedly allowed to return. You must know the story of Daniel in the Lion's den, advisor to Nebuchadnezzar. Refugees. Taken When Jerusalem Solomon's Temple was destroyed by Babylon. But were they taken under occupation when Babylon invaded Egypt and the surrounding City States. Babylon did this expanding its own Empire which again was old.

But Jerusalem documented was a copper mining town, this goes back thousands of years. Clear evidence of this. Who was it trading with if it was invaded and destroyed by Babylon. Never that Egypt it escaped from. Otherwise wouldn't it just make alliances. The enemy of my enemy. So it was provincially an Egyptian protectorate or city state. Again documented by Shebba and Solomon. She came from the lower kingdom.

That's if they even existed. No evidence of Solomon or David. Not a shred of evidence outside of belief. Instead it was rebuilt when Nehemiah returns. Otherwise it was this copper mining town. This is exactly when the old testament emerged. A bunch of refugees returning, many were intermarried Babylonians, or separate peoples. But they needed an identity. Needed a religion. Needed a home. Needed to establish themselves as separate to Egypt, with their own kingdom and city state. How long were they away as refugees in Babylon, so much longer.

Egypt had also had huge civil wars. Upper and lower losing influence and power. Big thing. Causing a break off. A dynasty wiped out. It spawned a pharaoh who later became cursed. He declared himself supreme after annihilating former influences. They had set up shop in the lower kingdom offending the upper kingdom. There are the lineage links into Ramses whatever that number etc. But not Moses no.

Who knows. Except there are a real conflict of records. The Summerian tablets are older. Sargon of Akkad, Hummurabi. But this guy Moses as a common story is similarly out in India. And around the globe in ancient tales of how they set up kingdoms. It of course is mythology.

That is a very simple explanation. There is no accurate history. The belief is otherwise ironclad religions. But there is a heap of controversy. Conflicting records and the source. The source as established was Babylonian. It became something else on refounding. We did that above.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No, it's the source of the Old Testament.

Real simple where did Nehemiah come from. When Babylon was destroyed by Persia the refugees were supposedly allowed to return. You must know the story of Daniel in the Lion's den, advisor to Nebuchadnezzar. Refugees. Taken When Jerusalem Solomon's Temple was destroyed by Babylon. But were they taken under occupation when Babylon invaded Egypt and the surrounding City States. Babylon did this expanding its own Empire which again was old.

But Jerusalem documented was a copper mining town, this goes back thousands of years. Clear evidence of this. Who was it trading with if it was invaded and destroyed by Babylon. Never that Egypt it escaped from. Otherwise wouldn't it just make alliances. The enemy of my enemy. So it was provincially an Egyptian protectorate or city state. Again documented by Shebba and Solomon. She came from the lower kingdom.

That's if they even existed. No evidence of Solomon or David. Not a shred of evidence outside of belief. Instead it was rebuilt when Nehemiah returns. Otherwise it was this copper mining town. This is exactly when the old testament emerged. A bunch of refugees returning, many were intermarried Babylonians, or separate peoples. But they needed an identity. Needed a religion. Needed a home. Needed to establish themselves as separate to Egypt. Their own kingdom and city state. How long were they away as refugees in Babylon, so much longer.

Egypt had also had huge civil wars. Upper and lower losing influence and power. Big thing. Causing a break off. A dynasty wiped out. It spawned a pharaoh who later became cursed. He declared himself supreme after annihilating former influences. They had set up shop in the lower kingdom offending the upper kingdom. There are the lineage links into Ramses whatever that number etc. But not Moses no.

Who knows. Except there are a real conflict of records. The Summerian tablets are older. Sargon of Akkad, Hummurabi, But this guy Moses as a common story is similarly out in India. And around the globe in ancient tales of how they set up kingdoms. It of course is mythology.

That is a very simple explanation. There is no accurate history. The belief is otherwise ironclad religions. But there is a heap of controversy. Conflicting records and the source. The source as established was Babylonian. It became something else on refounding. We did that above.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No, it's the source of the Old Testament.

Real simple where did Nehemiah come from. When Babylon was destroyed by Persia the refugees were supposedly allowed to return. You must know the story of Daniel in the Lion's den, advisor to Nebuchadnezzar. Refugees. Taken When Jerusalem Solomon's Temple was destroyed by Babylon. But were they taken under occupation when Babylon invaded Egypt and the surrounding City States. Babylon did this expanding its own Empire which again was old.

But Jerusalem documented was a copper mining town, this goes back thousands of years. Clear evidence of this. Who was it trading with if it was invaded and destroyed by Babylon. Never that Egypt it escaped from. Otherwise wouldn't it just make alliances. The enemy of my enemy. So it was provincially an Egyptian protectorate or city state.

That's if they even existed. No evidence of Solomon or David. Not a shred of evidence outside of belief. Instead it was rebuilt when Nehemiah returns. Otherwise it was this copper mining town. This is exactly when the old testament emerged. A bunch of refugees returning, many were intermarried Babylonians, or separate peoples. But they needed an identity. Needed a religion. Needed a home. Needed to establish themselves as separate to Egypt. Their own kingdom and city state. How long were they away as refugees in Babylon, so much longer.

Egypt had also had huge civil wars. Upper and lower losing influence and power. Big thing. Causing a break off. A dynasty wiped out. It spawned a pharaoh who later became cursed. He declared himself supreme after annihilating former influences. They had set up shop in the lower kingdom offending the upper kingdom. There are the lineage links into Ramses whatever that number etc. But not Moses no.

Who knows. Except there are a real conflict of records. The Summerian tablets are older. Sargon of Akkad, Hummurabi, But this guy Moses as a common story is similarly out in India. And around the globe in ancient tales of how they set up kingdoms. It of course is mythology.

That is a very simple explanation. There is no accurate history. The belief is otherwise ironclad religions. But there is a heap of controversy. Conflicting records and the source. The source as established was Babylonian. It became something else on refounding. We did that above.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No, it's the source of the Old Testament.

Real simple where did Nehemiah come from. When Babylon was destroyed by Persia the refugees were supposedly allowed to return. You must know the story of Daniel in the Lion's den, advisor to Nebuchadnezzar. Refugees. Taken When Jerusalem Solomon's Temple was destroyed by Babylon. But were they taken under occupation when Babylon invaded Egypt and the surrounding City States. Babylon did this expanding its own Empire which again was old.

But Jerusalem documented was a copper mining town, this goes back thousands of years. Clear evidence of this. Who was it trading with if it was invaded and destroyed by Babylon. Never that Egypt it escaped from. Otherwise wouldn't it just make alliances. The enemy of my enemy. So it was provincially an Egyptian protectorate or city state.

That's if they even existed. No evidence of Solomon or David. Not a shred of evidence outside of belief. Instead it was rebuilt when Nehemiah returns. Otherwise it was this copper mining town. This is exactly when the old testament emerged. A bunch of refugees returning, many were intermarried Babylonians, or separate peoples. But they needed an identity. Needed a religion. Needed a home. Needed to establish themselves as separate to Egypt. Their own kingdom and city state. How long were they away as refugees in Babylon, so much longer.

Egypt had also had huge civil wars. Upper and lower losing influence and power. Big thing. Causing a break off. A dynasty wiped out. It spawned a pharaoh who later became cursed. He declared himself supreme after annihilating former influences. They had set up shop in the lower kingdom offending the upper kingdom. There are the lineage links into Ramses whatever that number etc. But not Moses no.

Who knows. Except there are a real conflict of records. The Summerian tablets are older. Sargon of Akkad, Hummurabi, But this guy Moses as a common story is similarly out in India. And around the globe in ancient tales of how they set up kingdoms. It of course is mythology.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No, it's the source of the Old Testament.

Real simple where did Nehemiah come from. When Babylon was destroyed by Persia the refugees were supposedly allowed to return. You must know the story of Daniel in the Lion's den, advisor to Nebuchadnezzar. Refugees. Taken When Jerusalem Solomon's Temple was destroyed by Babylon. But were they taken under occupation when Babylon invaded Egypt and the surrounding City States. Babylon did this expanding its own Empire which again was old.

But Jerusalem documented was a copper mining town, this goes back thousands of years. Clear evidence of this. Who was it trading with if it was invaded and destroyed by Babylon. Never that Egypt it escaped from. Otherwise wouldn't it just make alliances. The enemy of my enemy. So it was provincially an Egyptian protectorate or city state.

That's if they even existed. No evidence of Solomon or David. Not a shred of evidence outside of belief. Instead it was rebuilt when Nehemiah returns. Otherwise it was this copper mining town. This is exactly when the old testament emerged. A bunch of refugees returning, many were intermarried Babylonians, or separate peoples. But they needed an identity. Needed a religion. Needed a home. Needed to establish themselves as separate to Egypt. Their own kingdom and city state. How long were they away as refugees in Babylon, so much longer.

Egypt had also had huge civil wars. Upper and lower losing influence and power. Big thing. Causing a break off. A dynasty wiped out. It spawned a pharaoh who later became cursed. He declared himself supreme after annihilating former influences. They had set up shop in the lower kingdom offending the upper kingdom. There are the lineage links into Ramses whatever that number etc. But not Moses no.

Who knows. Except there are a real conflict of records. The Sumnerian tablets are older. Sargon of Akkad, Hummurabi, But this guy Moses as a common story is similarly out in India. And around the globe in ancient tales of how they set up kingdoms. It of course is mythology.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

No, it's the source of the Old Testament.

Real simple where did Nehemiah come from. When Babylon was destroyed by Persia the refugees were supposedly allowed to return. You must know the story of Daniel in the Lion's den, advisor to Nebuchadnezzar. Refugees. Taken When Jerusalem Solomon's Temple was destroyed by Babylon. But were they taken under occupation when Babylon invaded Egypt and the surrounding City States. Babylon did this expanding its own Empire which again was old.

But Jerusalem documented was a copper mining town, this goes back thousands of years. Clear evidence of this. Who was it trading with if it was invaded and destroyed by Babylon. Never that Egypt it escaped from. Otherwise wouldn't it just make alliances. The enemy of my enemy. So it was provincially an Egyptian protectorate or city state.

That's if they even existed. No evidence of Solomon or David. Not a shred of evidence outside of belief. Instead it was rebuilt when Nehemiah returns. Otherwise it was this copper mining town. This is exactly when the old testament emerged. A bunch of refugees returning, many were intermarried Babylonians, or separate peoples. But they needed an identity. Needed a religion. Needed a home. Needed to establish themselves as separate to Egypt. Their own kingdom. How long were they away as refugees in Babylon, so much longer.

Egypt had also had huge civil wars. Upper and lower losing influence and power. Big thing. Causing a break off. A dynasty wiped out. It spawned a pharaoh who later became cursed. He declared himself supreme after annihilating former influences. They had set up shop in the lower kingdom offending the upper kingdom. There are the lineage links into Ramses whatever that number etc. But not Moses no.

Who knows. Except there are a real conflict of records. The Sumnerian tablets are older. But this guy Moses as a common story is similarly out in India. And around the globe in ancient tales of how they set up kingdoms. It of course is mythology.

2 years ago
1 score