No such thing as Moses. Sargon of Akkad. Summerian. The Babylonian Talmud. Until Nehemiah built, or rebuilt the walls, Jerusalem has struggled to find any history, outside of a possible city state, mining copper, coexisting as Egyptian. Solomon, David didn't exist or were also somebody else. Like almost every other description. They were common stories adapted over time. It gets far more controversial with the people describing it. Of course there is some validity there needs to be just enough. But it isn't when it comes to it. It's a rewritten translation.

The Bible simply isn't fact. It claims Babylon destroyed Jerusalem. But in its description is largely Babylon being destroyed by Persia. Then afterwards there's recording upon Jerusalem being founded, it largely takes shape on it being rebuilt. It is then that the old testament was established. What happened prior are heaps of references changing over time, reworded from common stories. Did they occur, do they match descriptions. No real evidence proves this outside of much looser descriptions. What has been proved is it has been relayered.

Moses ten commandments are also Summerian. They're the code of laws by Hammurabi.

Egypt had also changed losing influence, upper and lower kingdoms fought. There is also the very controversial pharaoh who got cursed, didn't he kinda start the whole one god theme, declaring himself supreme.

Historically it all emerges there, Summerian, Egyptian. But it has changed over time. Western civilization and its modern basis, Christianity the record keepers. But when you quote stuff you need to have the knowledge it simply isn't what it seems. The facts behind it have evolved. Yes it is a good read and there is a sense of accuracy. But it simply isn't fact and cannot be claimed to be such.

Not getting into it. Believe what you want. Except it's as clear as day what that meant. The wandering star or comet.

No such thing as Moses. Sargon of Akkad. Summerian. The Babylonian Talmud. Until Nehemiah built, or rebuilt the walls, Jerusalem has struggled to find any history, outside of a possible city state, mining copper, coexisting as Egyptian. Solomon, David didn't exist or were also somebody else. Like almost every other description. They were common stories adapted over time. It gets far more controversial with the people describing it. Of course there is some validity there needs to be just enough. But it isn't when it comes to it. It's a rewritten translation.

The Bible simply isn't fact. It claims Babylon destroyed Jerusalem. But in its description is largely Babylon being destroyed by Persia. Then afterwards there's recording upon Jerusalem being founded, it largely takes shape on it being rebuilt. It is then that the old testament was established. What happened prior are heaps of references changing over time, reworded from common stories. Did they occur, do they match descriptions. No real evidence proves this outside of much looser descriptions. What has been proved is it has been relayered.

Moses ten commandments are also Summerian. They're the code of laws by Hammurabi.

Egypt had also changed losing influence, upper and lower kingdoms fought. There is also the very controversial pharaoh who got cursed, didn't he kinda started the whole one god theme, declaring himself supreme.

Historically it all emerges there, Summerian, Egyptian. But it has changed over time. Western civilization and its modern basis, Christianity the record keepers. But when you quote stuff you need to have the knowledge it simply isn't what it seems. The facts behind it have evolved. Yes it is a good read and there is a sense of accuracy. But it simply isn't fact and cannot be claimed to be such.

Not getting into it. Believe what you want. Except it's as clear as day what that meant. The wandering star or comet.

No such thing as Moses. Sargon of Akkad. Summerian. The Babylonian Talmud. Until Nehemiah built, or rebuilt the walls, Jerusalem has struggled to find any history, outside of a possible city state, mining copper, coexisting as Egyptian. Solomon, David didn't exist or were also somebody else. Like almost every other description. They were common stories adapted over time. It gets far more controversial with the people describing it. Of course there is some validity there needs to be just enough. But it isn't when it comes to it. It's a rewritten translation.

The Bible simply isn't fact. It claims Babylon destroyed Jerusalem. But in its description is largely Babylon being destroyed by Persia. Then afterwards there's recording upon Jerusalem being founded, it largely takes shape on it being rebuilt. It is then that the old testament was established. What happened prior are heaps of references changing over time, reworded from common stories. Did they occur, do they match descriptions. No real evidence proves this outside of much looser descriptions. What has been proved is it has been relayered.

Moses ten commandments are also Summerian. They're the code of laws by Hammurabi.

Egypt had also changed losing influence, upper and lower kingdoms fought. There is also the very controversial pharaoh who got cursed, didn't he kinda started the whole one god theme, declaring himself supreme.

Not getting into it. Believe what you want. Except it's as clear as day what that meant. The wandering star or comet.