It doesn't quite work like that. 12,000 years ago was the younger dryas. It was a planetary hit by a comet or asteroid, the Greenland crater. It was an extinction level event killing the megafauna. Mastodons freezing with food in their mouth. Cave lions, fully preserved, under thick ice.

The Sun can do damage, and nova, on larger scales, but it really doesn't tend too, because as it novas in the increasing activity, it mainly causes our magnetic field to weaken, and it will likely cause crustal displacement, tectonic plates to increase in activity, and it causes earthquakes and volcanoes.

Obviously in the periods of activity we have extremes, periods of warming, until eventually becoming cooler. As a species we do affect this. But it's an oxymoron using more electricity in increasing solar activity and storms. They affect electronics. A big one hitting could render them quite useless. But it's the affects it causes on the planetary field, and it could leave us susceptible to impact and crustal movement.

There is no accurate science on it, what is triggered, and to what extent, and what fully causes it. Hyperconjecture.

With our ancients they studied alignment, and conjuctions. This became the pattern of the forewarning. Today it's obvious we're in a period of abnormal. Easily identified by a weakening field, increasing weather, true North moving, and solar activity, Etc.

Who knows. No accurate science behind it. But I disagree with the micronova, because then it was likely a planetary hit. The Greenland crater. It is much more severe than a nova. It took much longer to settle. Imagine a comet hitting the planet. What did the sky look like if you survived and later observed it. The Northern lights would be where for example.

It doesn't quite work like that. 12,000 years ago was the younger dryas. It was a planetary hit by a comet or asteroid, the Greenland crater. It was an extinction level event killing the megafauna. Mastodons freezing with food in their mouth. Cave lions, fully preserved, under thick ice.

The Sun can do damage, and nova, on larger scales, but it really doesn't tend too, because as it novas in the increasing activity, it mainly causes our magnetic field to weaken, and it will likely cause crustal displacement, tectonic plates to increase in activity, and it causes earthquakes and volcanoes.

Obviously in the periods of activity we have extremes, periods of warming, until eventually becoming cooler. As a species we do affect this. But it's an oxymoron using more electricity in increasing solar activity and storms. They affect electronics. A big one hitting could render them quite useless. But it's the affects it causes on the planetary field, and it could leave us susceptible to impact and crustal movement.

There is no accurate science on it, what is triggered, and to what extent, and what fully causes it. Hyperconjecture.

With our ancients they studied alignment, and conjuctions. This became the pattern of the forewarning. Today it's obvious we're in a period of abnormal. Easily identified by a weakening field, increasing weather, true North moving, and solar activity, Etc.

Who knows. No accurate science behind it. But I disagree with the micronova, because then it was likely a planetary hit. The Greenland crater. It is much more severe than a nova.

It doesn't quite work like that. 12,000 years ago was the younger dryas. It was a planetary hit by a comet or asteroid, the Greenland crater. It was an extinction level event killing the megafauna. Mastodons freezing with food in their mouth. Cave lions, fully preserved, under thick ice.

The Sun can do damage, and nova, on larger scales, but it really doesn't tend too, because as it novas in the increasing activity, it mainly causes our magnetic field to weaken, and it will likely cause crustal displacement, tectonic plates to increase in activity, and it causes earthquakes and volcanoes.

Obviously in the periods of activity we have extremes, periods of warming, until eventually becoming cooler. As a species we do affect this. But it's an oxymoron using more electricity in increasing solar activity and storms. They affect electronics. A big one hitting could render them quite useless. But it's the affects it causes on the planetary field, and it could leave us susceptible to impact and crustal movement.

There is no accurate science on it, what is triggered, and to what extent, and what fully causes it. Hyperconjecture.

With our ancients they studied alignment, and conjuctions. This became the pattern of the forewarning. Today it's obvious we're in a period of abnormal. Easily identified by a weakening field, increasing weather, true North moving, and solar activity.

Who knows. No accurate science behind it. But I disagree with the micronova, because then it was likely a planetary hit. The Greenland crater. It is much more severe than a nova.

It doesn't quite work like that. 12,000 years ago was the younger dryas. It was a planetary hit by a comet or asteroid, the Greenland crater. It was an extinction level event killing the megafauna. Mastodons freezing with food in their mouth. Cave lions, fully preserved, under thick ice.

The Sun can do damage, and nova, on larger scales, but it really doesn't tend too, because as it novas in increasing the activity, it mainly causes our magnetic field to weaken, and it will likely cause crustal displacement, tectonic plates to increase in activity, and it causes earthquakes and volcanoes.

Obviously in the periods of activity we have extremes, periods of warming, until eventually becoming cooler. As a species we do affect this. But it's an oxymoron using more electricity in increasing solar activity and storms. They affect electronics. A big one hitting could render them quite useless. But it's the affects it causes on the planetary field, and it could leave us susceptible to impact and crustal movement.

There is no accurate science on it, what is triggered, and to what extent, and what fully causes it. Hyperconjecture.

With our ancients they studied alignment, and conjuctions. This became the pattern of the forewarning. Today it's obvious we're in a period of abnormal. Easily identified by a weakening field, increasing weather, true North moving.

Who knows. No accurate science behind it. But I disagree with the micronova, because then it was likely a planetary hit. The Greenland crater. It is much more severe than a nova.

It doesn't quite work like that. 12,000 years ago was the younger dryas. It was a planetary hit by a comet or asteroid, the Greenland crater. It was extinction level event killing the megafauna. Mastodon freezing with food in their mouth. Cave lions, fully preserved, under thick i e.

The Sun can do damage, and nova, on larger scales, but it really doesn't tend too, because as it novas in increasing the activity, it mainly causes our magnetic field to weaken, and it will likely cause crustal displacement, tectonics to increase activity, and it causes earthquakes and volcanoes.

Obviously in the periods of activity we have extremes, periods of warming, until becoming cooler. As a species we do affect this. But it's an oxymoron using more electricity in increasing solar activity and storms. They affect electronics. A big one hitting could render them quite useless. But it's the affects on the planetary field, and it could leave us susceptible to impact and crustal movement.

There is no accurate science on it, what is triggered, and to what extent, and what fully causes it. Hyperconjecture.

With our ancients they studied alignment, and conjuctions. But it's obvious we're in a period of abnormal. Easily identified by a weakening field, increasing weather, true North moving.

Who knows. No accurate science behind it.