What are you babbling about? It's what supposedly deters nuclear war. Complete annihilation. You're thinking of tactical nukes. Not a nuclear exchange. Where okay. A tactical nuke seeks an achievable victory. A nuclear exchange seeks to destroy an enemy. Hence the deterrence doctrine is called, again that buzzword, or adopted phrase; Mutually assured destruction. It's also why no tactical nukes have been deployed in combat yet.

But we're talking about deep bunkers and access to locations which supposedly can survive nuclear war. The problem is there's nothing left to be in command of. They'll probably just become cannibals anyway. Love, Sex, and Robots.

What are you babbling about? It's what supposedly deters nuclear war. Complete annihilation. You're thinking of tactical nukes. Not a nuclear exchange. Where okay. A tactical nuke seeks an achievable victory. A nuclear exchange seeks to destroy an enemy. Hence the deterrence doctrine is called, again that buzzword, or adopted phrase; Mutually assured destruction. It's also why no tactical nukes have been deployed in combat yet.

But we're talking about deep bunkers and access to locations which supposedly can survive nuclear war. The problem is there's nothing left to be in command of. They'll probably just become cannibals anyway.

What are you babbling about? It's what supposedly deters nuclear war. Complete annihilation. You're thinking of tactical nukes. Not a nuclear exchange. Where okay. A tactical nuke seeks an achievable victory. A nuclear exchange seeks to destroy an enemy.

But we're talking about deep bunkers and access to locations which supposedly can survive nuclear war. The problem is there's nothing left to be in command of. They'll probably just become cannibals anyway.