They need both sperm and a womb, whether they're inseminated or labgrown.

Men cannot birth, no mammal on the planet can. They then aren't mammals. They're splicing gone wrong. Females trans to males, are not biological males. They keep their womb, or any embryos can be inseminated back.

Science has tried with male mice. China has gotten the furtherest. The mice and babies died. But the male mice got pregnant, dying and killing the babies when due to birth.

If you're talking about clones, dark science, only rumors. Where the machines are getting far smarter. But SYFI. However not without some truth. Embryos can be harvested, and impregnated, but can a machine simulate a womb. Fetuses are surviving outside of the womb at breaking records in machines at very early stages of development, not much more than a month or two. The problem is at what point is this effective. It simply isn't a viable alternative to the natural process, unless you can develop super clones, already aged.

Ethically he is absolutely correct. There is no ethical argument for it. The risk, the cost, aren't worth it. Human cloning is outlawed. But there are increasing workarounds, on what is being considered natural. There is very dark science being done. But nobody will admit to it. China closed down its record of artificial human birth. However there is simply no science to date that allows male humans to birth. There are theories in the scientific journal, and attempts on rodents, but nothing viable.

They need both sperm and a womb, whether they're inseminated or labgrown.

Men cannot birth, no mammal on the planet can. They then aren't mammals. They're splicing gone wrong. Females trans to males, are not biological males. They keep their womb, or any embryos can be inseminated back.

Science has tried with male mice. China has gotten the furtherest. The mice and babies died. But the male mice got pregnant, dying and killing the babies when due to birth.

If you're talking about clones, dark science, only rumors. Where the machines are getting far smarter. But SYFI. However not without some truth. Embryos can be harvested, and impregnated, but can a machine simulate a womb. Fetuses are surviving outside of the womb at breaking records in machines at very early stages of development, not much more than a month or two. The problem is at what point is this effective. It simply isn't a viable alternative to the natural process, unless you can develop super clones, already aged.

Ethically he is absolutely correct. There is no ethical argument for it. The risk, the cost, aren't worth it. Human cloning is outlawed. But there are increasing workarounds, on what is being considered natural. There is very dark science being done. But nobody will admit to it. China closed down its record of artifical human birth. However there is simply no science to date that allows male humans to birth. There are theories in the scientific journal, and attempts on rodents, but nothing viable.

They need both sperm and a womb, whether they're inseminated or labgrown.

Men cannot birth, no mammal on the planet can. They then aren't mammals. They're splicing gone wrong. Females trans to males, are not biological males. They keep their womb, or any embryos can be inseminated back.

Science has tried with male mice. China has gotten the furtherest. The mice and babies died. But the male mice got pregnant, dying and killing the babies when due to birth.

If you're talking about clones, dark science, only rumors. Where the machines are getting far smarter. But SYFI. However not without some truth. Embryos can be harvested, and impregnated, but can a machine simulate a womb. Fetuses are surviving outside of the womb at breaking records in machines at very early stages of development, not much more than a month or two. The problem is at what point is this effective. It simply isn't a viable alternative to the natural process, unless you can develop super clones, already aged.

Ethically he is absolutely correct. There is no ethical argument for it. The risk, the cost, aren't worth it. Human cloning is outlawed. But there are increasing workarounds, on what is being considered natural. There is very dark science being done. But nobody will admit to it. China closed down its record of artifical human birth. However there is simply no science to date that allows male humans to birth. There are theories, in the scientific journal, and attempts on rodents, but nothing viable.

They need both sperm and a womb, whether they're inseminated or labgrown.

Men cannot birth, no mammal on the planet can. They then aren't mammals. They're splicing gone wrong. Females trans to males, are not biological males. They keep their womb, or any embryos can be inseminated back.

Science has tried with male mice. China has gotten the furtherest. The mice and babies died. But the male mice got pregnant, dying and killing the babies when due to birth.

If you're talking about clones, dark science, only rumors. Where the machines are getting far smarter. But SYFI. However not without some truth. Embryos can be harvested, and impregnated, but can a machine simulate a womb. Fetuses are surviving outside of the womb at breaking records in machines at very early stages of development, not much more than a month or two. The problem is at what point is this effective. It simply isn't a viable alternative to the natural process, unless you can develop super clones, already aged.

They need both sperm and a woman, whether they're inseminated or labgrown.

Men cannot birth, no mammal on the planet can. They then aren't mammals. They're splicing gone wrong. Females trans to males, are not biological males. They keep their womb, or any embryos can be inseminated back.

Science has tried with male mice. China has gotten the furtherest. The mice and babies died. But the male mice got pregnant, dying and killing the babies when due to birth.

If you're talking about clones, dark science, only rumors. Where the machines are getting far smarter. But SYFI. However not without some truth. Embryos can be harvested, and impregnated, but can a machine simulate a womb. Fetuses are surviving outside of the womb at breaking records in machines at very early stages of development, not much more than a month or two. The problem is at what point is this effective. It simply isn't a viable alternative to the natural process, unless you can develop super clones, already aged.

They need both sperm and a woman, whether they're inseminated or labgrown.

Men cannot birth, no mammal on the planet can. They then aren't mammals. They're splicing gone wrong. Females trans to males, are not biological males. They keep their womb, or it can be inseminated back.

Science has tried with male mice. China has gotten the furtherest. The mice and babies died. But the male mice got pregnant, dying and killing the babies when due to birth.

If you're talking about clones, dark science, only rumors. Where the machines are getting far smarter. But SYFI. However not without some truth. Embryos can be harvested, and impregnated, but can a machine simulate a womb. Fetuses are surviving outside of the womb at breaking records in machines at very early stages of development, not much more than a month or two. The problem is at what point is this effective. It simply isn't a viable alternative to the natural process, unless you can develop super clones, already aged.

They need both sperm and a woman. Whether they're inseminated or labgrown.

Men cannot birth, no mammal on the planet can. They then aren't mammals. They're splicing gone wrong. Females trans to males, are not biological males. They keep their womb. Or it can be inseminated back.

Science has tried with male mice. China has gotten the furtherest. The mice and babies died. But the male mice got pregnant, dying and killing the babies when due to birth.

If you're talking about clones, dark science, only rumors. Where the machines are getting far smarter. But SYFI. However not without some truth. Embryos can be harvested, but can a machine simulate a womb. Fetuses are surviving outside of the womb at breaking records in machines at very early stages of development, not much more than a month or two. The problem is at what point is this effective. It simply isn't a viable alternative to the natural process, unless you can develop super clones, already aged.