This would be a far easier option than rolling out 5G, and raise far fewer eyebrows, as it would be completely hidden.
It is possible, but all home aplliance manufacturers have to make an agreement on some protocols and hierarchy of selection some master device who will be connected with base station and collect data from other devices of other manufacturers. I think that it could be as complex as rolling out next generation.
Still not enough data. What you're speculating requires so much data that we could not possibly have with anything close to the current tech.
Overestimating tech advances is usual thing. Do you remember Moore's law? And many top parties make decisions on it. Or that hype around magneto-resistive RAM? And so on.
At the time of planning total surveilance, they take a storage capacity growth as constant. Many years later, when it comes to real implementations, that prognosis failed. So they forced development of ANNs and other stuff to reduce amount of data to store.
With the same probability they could have been failed with bandwidth expectations, or cameras resolution, f.e.
They failed whole plan of total surveillance, but still got an ability to surveil any choosen person on demand. Not that bad for them. From the other side, they occasionally succeded with marketing of that shitty voice assistants.
Something like that.
This would be a far easier option than rolling out 5G, and raise far fewer eyebrows, as it would be completely hidden.
It is possible, but all home aplliance manufacturers have to make an agreement on some protocols and ierarchy of selection some master device who will be connected with base station. I think that it could be as complex as rolling out next generation.
Still not enough data. What you're speculating requires so much data that we could not possibly have with anything close to the current tech.
Overestimating tech advances is usual thing. Do you remember Moore's law? And many top parties make decisions on it. Or that hype around magneto-resistive RAM? And so on.
At the time of planning total surveilance, they take a storage capacity growth as constant. Many years later, when it comes to real implementations, that prognosis failed. So they forced development of ANNs and other stuff to reduce amount of data to store.
With the same probability they could have been failed with bandwidth expectations, or cameras resolution, f.e.
They failed whole plan of total surveillance, but still got an ability to surveil any choosen person on demand. Not that bad for them. From the other side, they occasionally succeded with marketing of that shitty voice assistants.
Something like that.