So, just so I'm clear, your concern with 5G is that it has enough bandwidth to support more surveillance?
Exactly.
As you said, we're still not using 4G fully, so, if they wanted to do surveillance, why wouldn't they have maxed this out yet?
4G is more than enough for internet for users. But it can't handle constant surveillance streams. Not only with bandwidth, but also with a increased number of devices per one base station. With 4G, convetional internet users will notice shrinking bandwith if you began to use it for surveillance. 5G allows more mobile stations and higher bandwidth for additional, hidden from conventional users trafic.
Even with AI, trying to process it all in any meaningful way is futile if you have so damn much data.
There is no such thing as AI, and hardly will in observable future. ANNs is not even close to AI by any mean.
As for data - it is not intended for wide constant processing. It will be stored in archives for some time. When state/corporation need to pursue somebody who is too disturbing them - they will look for that stored data to find how they could effectively pursue that person.
You know, like when SJW want to attack somebody they don't like, they find something in old posts of that person. Since this way of thinking is shared among elites and their puppets, you will find it in more serious things too.
Not really true
I mean a band and power in whole, not exact MHz and dBm. Humans are not so sensitive for RF and it does not matter, is it 960-970MHz band or 965-980MHz band. There is FR2 in 5G, on the K and Ka bands (25-40GHz), but that range widely used by nearly any automatic door, so humans are under that shower for a very long time. Along with that, that Frequency Range 2 shown poor results. This range have very wide bandwith, but very poor outdor stability (rain, leaves, fog is an obstacle for that band), so it was supposed that this range will be used inside buildings and apartments. However real use shown that even a wardrobe in a room become a obstacle for that radiowaves, and there is no any real use for gigabts wide channel inside apartment if that data will eventually be piped into not so wide FR1 conventional bands to reach the base station. There is no any sense to have 10Gbit link from your PC to the door, if you have only 100Mbit coming to the door from your internet provider.
So, just so I'm clear, your concern with 5G is that it has enough bandwidth to support more surveillance?
Exactly.
As you said, we're still not using 4G fully, so, if they wanted to do surveillance, why wouldn't they have maxed this out yet?
4G is more than enough for internet for users. But it can't handle constant surveillance streams. Not only with bandwidth, but also with a increased number of devices per one base station. With 4G, convetional internet users will notice shrinking bandwith if you began to use it for surveillance. 5G allows more mobile stations and higher bandwidth for additional, hidden from conventional users trafic.
Even with AI, trying to process it all in any meaningful way is futile if you have so damn much data.
There is no such thing as AI, and hardly will in observable future. ANNs is not even close to AI by any mean.
As for data - it is not intended for wide constant processing. It will be stored in archives for some time. When state/corporation need to pursue somebody who is too disturbing them - they will look for that stored data to find how they could effectively pursue that person.
You know, like when SJW want to attack somebody they don't like, they find something in old posts of that person. Since this way of thinking is shared among elites and their puppets, you will find it in more serious things too.
Not really true
I mean a band and power in whole, not exact MHz and dBm. Humans are not so sensitive for RF and it does not matter, is it 960-970MHz band or 965-980MHz band. There is FR2 in 5G, on the K and Ka bands (25-40GHz), but that range widely used by nearly any automatic door, so humans are under that shower for a very long time. Along with that, that Frequency Range 2 shown poor results. This range have very wide bandwith, but very poor outdor stability (rain, leaves, fog is an obstacle for that band), so it was supposed that this range will be used inside buildings and apartments. However real use shown that even a wardrobe in a room become a obstacle for that radiowaves, and there is no any real use for gigabts wide channel inside apartment it that data will eventually be piped into not so wide FR1 conventional bands to reach the base station. There is no any sense to have 10Gbit link from your PC to the door, if you have only 100Mbit coming to the door from your internet provider.