Hydrogen is a better option.

It's a valid point.

But... the thing I like about EV is that electricity is the great "common denominator", so to speak.

For example, I can make electricity out of anything (solar, wind, thorium, hydrogen, petrol, uranium, wood, coal, "zero-point", etc.). Whereas, I can't make hydrogen out of wind, or coal.

Know what I mean?

At that level, EV seem smart from an industry perspective - "stable" - not going to have to retool the manufacturing infrastructure (every few decades?). Globally and locally, there will always be a way to produce electricity.

Right? Hmm. It's an interesting consideration for me - no matter how inefficient they are, currently. Improvements will come, I do believe.

There is probably a market for both EV and Hydrogen V - reasons why I would want to own both.

But let me finish with this: unless modern society implodes (and I give that a ~20% chance right now, and we are reduced to campfires and savagery again), the future is EV. Because once we have basketball-sized fusion devices (or Tesla's global power grid is realized), batts will no longer be necessary -- just lots of on-demand E!

Thanks for the communication. #cheers

PS. I was always impressed that Elon named his car company "Tesla" and not "Franklin". Millions of people around the world talk about the genius of N. Tesla now.

Hydrogen is a better option.

It's a valid point.

But... the thing I like about EV is that electricity is the great "common denominator", so to speak.

For example, I can make electricity out of anything (solar, wind, thorium, hydrogen, petrol, uranium, wood, coal, "zero-point", etc.). Whereas, I can't make hydrogen out of wind, or coal.

Know what I mean?

Just at that level, EV seem smart from an industry perspective - "stable" - not going to have to retool the manufacturing infrastructure (every few decades?). Globally and locally, there will always be a way to produce electricity.

Right? Hmm. It's an interesting consideration for me - no matter how inefficient they are, currently. Improvements will come, I do believe.

There is probably a market for both EV and Hydrogen V - reasons why I would want to own both.

But let me finish with this: unless modern society implodes (and I give that a ~20% chance right now, and we are reduced to campfires and savagery again), the future is EV. Because once we have basketball-sized fusion devices (or Tesla's global power grid is realized), batts will no longer be necessary -- just lots of on-demand E!

Thanks for the communication. #cheers

PS. I was always impressed that Elon named his car company "Tesla" and not "Franklin". Millions of people around the world talk about the genius of N. Tesla now.

Hydrogen is a better option.

It's a valid point.

But... the thing I like about EV is that electricity is the great "common denominator", so to speak.

For example, I can make electricity out of anything (solar, wind, thorium, hydrogen, petrol, uranium, wood, coal, "zero-point", etc.). Whereas, I can't make hydrogen out of wind, or coal.

Know what I mean?

Just at that level, EV seem smart from an industry perspective - "stable" - not going to have to retool the manufacturing infrastructure (every few decades?). Globally and locally, there will always be a way to produce electricity.

Right? Hmm. It's an interesting consideration for me - no matter how inefficient they are, currently. Improvements will come, I do believe.

There is probably a market for both EV and Hydrogen V - reasons why I would want to own both.

But let me finish with this: unless modern society implodes (and I give that a ~20% chance right now, and we are reduced to campfires and savagery again), the future is EV. Because once we have basketball-sized fusion devices (or Tesla's global power grid is realized), batts will no longer be necessary -- just lots of on-demand E!

Thanks for the communication. #cheers

PS. I was always impressed that Elon named his car company "Tesla" and not "Franklin". Millions of people around the world talk about the genius of N. Tesla now.

Hydrogen is a better option.

All things considered, I agree with you on this point.

But... the thing I like about EV is that electricity is the great "common denominator", so to speak.

For example, I can make electricity out of anything (solar, wind, thorium, hydrogen, petrol, uranium, wood, coal, "zero-point", etc.). Whereas, I can't make hydrogen out of wind, or coal.

Know what I mean?

Just at that level, EV seem smart from an industry perspective - "stable" - not going to have to retool the manufacturing infrastructure (every few decades?). Globally and locally, there will always be a way to produce electricity.

Right? Hmm. It's an interesting consideration for me - no matter how inefficient they are, currently. Improvements will come, I do believe.

There is probably a market for both EV and Hydrogen V - reasons why I would want to own both.

But let me finish with this: unless modern society implodes (and I give that a ~20% chance right now, and we are reduced to campfires and savagery again), the future is EV. Because once we have basketball-sized fusion devices (or Tesla's global power grid is realized), batts will no longer be necessary -- just lots of on-demand E!

Thanks for the communication. #cheers

PS. I was always impressed that Elon named his car company "Tesla" and not "Franklin". Millions of people around the world talk about the genius of N. Tesla now.

Hydrogen is a better option.

All things considered, I agree with you on this point.

But... the thing I like about EV is that electricity is the great "common denominator", so to speak.

For example, I can make electricity out of anything (solar, wind, thorium, hydrogen, petrol, uranium, wood, coal, "zero-point", etc.). Whereas, I can't make hydrogen out of wind, or coal.

Know what I mean?

Just at that level, EV seem smart from an industry perspective - "stable" - not going to have to retool the manufacturing infrastructure (every few decades?). Globally and locally, there will always be a way to produce electricity.

Right? Hmm. It's an interesting consideration for me - no matter how inefficient they are, currently. Improvements will come, I do believe.

There is probably a market for both EV and Hydrogen V - reasons why I would want to own both.

But let me finish with this: unless modern society implodes (and I give that a ~20% chance right now, and we are reduced to campfires and savagery again), the future is EV. Because once we have basketball-sized fusion devices (or Tesla's global power grid is realized), batts will no longer be necessary -- just lots of on-demand E!

Thanks for the communication. #cheers

PS. I was always impressed that Elon named his car company "Tesla" and not "Franklin". Millions of people around the world talk about N. Tesla now. #babysteps

Hydrogen is a better option.

All things considered, I agree with you on this point.

But... the thing I like about EV is that electricity is the great "common denominator", so to speak.

For example, I can make electricity out of anything (solar, wind, thorium, hydrogen, petrol, uranium, wood, coal, "zero-point", etc.). Whereas, I can't make hydrogen out of wind, or coal.

Know what I mean?

Just at that level, EV seem smart from an industry perspective - "stable" - not going to have to retool the manufacturing infrastructure (every few decades?). Globally and locally, there will always be a way to produce electricity.

Right? Hmm. It's an interesting consideration for me - no matter how inefficient they are, currently. Improvements will come, I do believe.

There is probably a market for both EV and Hydrogen V - reasons why I would want to own both.

But let me finish with this: unless modern society implodes (and I give that a ~20% chance right now, and we are reduced to campfires and savagery again), the future is EV. Because once we have basketball-sized fusion devices (or Tesla's global power grid is realized), batts will no longer be necessary -- just lots of on-demand E!

Thanks for the communication. #cheers

PS. I was always impressed that Elon named his car company "Tesla" and not "Franklin" - which has really woken the world up to this once totally forgotten genius.

Hydrogen is a better option.

All things considered, I agree with you on this point.

But... the thing I like about EV is that electricity is the great "common denominator", so to speak.

For example, I can make electricity out of anything (solar, wind, thorium, hydrogen, petrol, uranium, wood, coal, "zero-point", etc.). Whereas, I can't make hydrogen out of wind, or coal.

Know what I mean?

Just at that level, EV seem smart from an industry perspective - "stable" - not going to have to retool the manufacturing infrastructure (every few decades?). Globally and locally, there will always be a way to produce electricity.

Right? Hmm. It's an interesting consideration for me - no matter how inefficient they are, currently. Improvements will come, I do believe.

There is probably a market for both EV and Hydrogen V - reasons why I would want to own both.

But let me finish with this: unless modern society implodes (and I give that a ~20% chance right now, and we are reduced to campfires and savagery again), the future is EV. Because once we have basketball-sized fusion devices (or Tesla's global power grid is realized), batts will no longer be necessary -- just lots of on-demand E!

Thanks for the communication. #cheers

Hydrogen is a better option.

All things considered, I agree with you on this point.

But... the thing I like about EV is that electricity is the great "common denominator", so to speak.

For example, I can make electricity out of anything (solar, wind, thorium, hydrogen, petrol, uranium, wood, coal, "zero-point", etc.). Whereas, I can't make hydrogen out of wind, or coal.

Know what I mean?

Just at that level, EV seem smart from an industry perspective - "stable" - not going to have to retool the manufacturing infrastructure (every few decades?). Globally and locally, there will always be a way to produce electricity.

Right? Hmm. It's an interesting consideration for me - no matter how inefficient they are, currently. Improvements will come, I do believe.

There is probably a market for both EV and Hydrogen V - reasons why I would want to own both.

But let me finish with this: unless modern society implodes (and I give that a ~20% chance right now, and we are reduced to campfires and savagery again), the future is EV. Because once we have basketball-sized fusion devices (or Tesla's global power grid is realized), everything will be E!

Thanks for the communication. #cheers