Understand your bullshit? No, I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.

You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing. A joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand, or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes are massive distribution, and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. The potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.

They don't care about a few peasants, or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war, they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting, and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech doesn't care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless. But they've rigged that game. Cause the problem, force the solution, it's another advancement of profit off the demand they've caused for the tech being forced.

Please assume something else. You're a joke. This article is bullshit. Slicing their own lines causes, what. But they're still in control. Why? What are they doing? You thought they're losing. Joke.

There are heaps more concerns. Security and restructuring those lines, and eliminating risk, or containing it. But the population has caught up. The tech has advanced quicker than the debts of implementing it slower, or the geopolitics of it affecting other logistics. Away from this, they're mostly naive to almost anything but the greed they're empowering from the demand they're forcing. It has advanced and they use it too assume control. Cannot have it, without the other run off, being precipitated. As a result it implodes. Too what degree is the only question? But that future ahead is dark. It doesn't calm without its run off affecting far more. It didn't care anyway, because it was never about anything else, except assuming control.

Understand your bullshit? No, I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.

You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing. A joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand, or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes are massive distribution, and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. The potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.

They don't care about a few peasants, or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war, they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting, and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech doesn't care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless. But they've rigged that game. Cause the problem, force the solution, it's another advancement of profit off the demand they've caused for the tech being forced.

Please assume something else. You're a joke. This article is bullshit. Slicing their own lines causes, what. But they're still in control. Why? What are they doing? You thought they're losing. Joke.

There are heaps more concerns. Security and restructuring those lines, and eliminating risk, or containing it. But the population has caught up. The tech has advanced quicker than the debts of implementing it slower, or the geopolitics of it affecting other logistics. Away from this, they're mostly naive to almost anything but the greed they're empowering from the demand they're forcing. It has advanced and they use it too assume control. Cannot have it, without the other run off, being precipitated. As a result it implodes. Too what degree is the only question? But that future ahead is dark. It doesn't calm without its run off affecting far more. It didn't cate anyway. It was never about anything else.

Understand your bullshit? No, I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.

You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing. A joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand, or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes are massive distribution, and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. The potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.

They don't care about a few peasants, or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war, they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting, and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech doesn't care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless. But they've rigged that game. Cause the problem, force the solution, it's another advancement of profit off the demand they've caused for the tech being forced.

Please assume something else. You're a joke. This article is bullshit. Slicing their own lines causes, what. But they're still in control. Why? What are they doing? You thought they're losing. Joke.

Understand your bullshit? No, I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.

You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing. A joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand, or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes are massive distribution, and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. It's potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.

They don't care about a few peasants, or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war, they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting, and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech doesn't care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless. But they've rigged that game. Cause the problem, force the solution, it's another advancement of profit off the demand they've caused for the tech being forced.

Please assume something else. You're a joke. This article is bullshit. Slicing their own lines causes, what. But they're still in control. Why? What are they doing? You thought they're losing. Joke.

Understand your bullshit? No, I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.

You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing, a joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes massive distribution and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. It's potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.

They don't care about a few peasants or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech doesn't care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless. But they've rigged that game. Cause the problem, force the solution, it's another advancement of profit off the demand they've caused for the tech being forced.

Please assume something else. You're a joke. This article is bullshit. Slicing their own lines causes, what. But they're still in control. Why? What are they doing? You thought they're losing. Joke.

Understand your bullshit? No I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.

You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing, a joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes massive distribution and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. It's potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.

They don't care about a few peasants or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech doesn't care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless. But they've rigged that game. Cause the problem, force the solution, it's another advancement of profit off the demand they've caused for the tech being forced.

Please assume something else. You're a joke. This article is bullshit. Slicing their own lines causes, what. But they're still in control. Why? What are they doing? You thought they're losing. Joke.

Understand your bullshit? No I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.

You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing, a joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes massive distribution and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. It's potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.

They don't care about a few peasants or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech doesn't care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless. But they've rigged that game. Cause problem force the solution, it's another advancement of profit off the demand they've caused for the tech being forced.

Understand your bullshit? No I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.

You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing, a joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes massive distribution and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. It's potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.

They don't care about a few peasants or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech does care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless.