Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on your home's roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

It will be a slow process to replace existing usage and infrastructure, but eventually most vehicles will be electric.

Cargo ships and large machinery will likely continue to run on gas and diesel, but ie. 85-90% of consumer travel will be electric.

And other solutions will play a role too. ie. Germany is already building electric lanes on highways so delivery trucks can run on grid power. Like trolley buses, these trucks have arms that extend to connect to overhead wires. So large batteries are not always necessary.

There are also tens of millions of small engines like scooters, motorcycles, lawnmowers, generators that burn fuel, which in most cases, can be replaced with electric alternatives.

I watch a YouTuber who creates motorcycles that hit 100 mph and over 80 miles of range.

The biggest issue right now is pricing and supply of batteries. But as the next 10 years progress, the increased supply of lithium batteries will transform the consumer ecosystem of these goods, and ease of access to lithium powered devices.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on your home's roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

It will be a slow process to replace existing usage and infrastructure, but eventually most vehicles will be electric.

Cargo ships and large machinery will likely continue to run on gas and diesel, but ie. 85-90% of consumer travel will be electric.

And other solutions will play a role too. ie. Germany is already building electric lanes on highways so delivery trucks can run on grid power. Like trolley buses, these trucks have arms that extend to connect to overhead wires. So large batteries are not always necessary.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

It will be a slow process to replace existing usage and infrastructure, but eventually most vehicles will be electric.

Cargo ships and large machinery will likely continue to run on gas and diesel, but ie. 85-90% of consumer travel will be electric.

And other solutions will play a role too. ie. Germany is already building electric lanes on highways so delivery trucks can run on grid power. Like trolley buses, these trucks have arms that extend to connect to overhead wires. So large batteries are not always necessary.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

It will be a slow process to replace existing usage and infrastructure, but eventually most vehicles will be electric.

Cargo ships and large machinery will likely continue to run on gas and diesel, but ie. 85-90% of consumer travel will be electric.

And other solutions will play a role too. ie. Germany is already building electric lanes on highways so delivery trucks can run on grid power. Like trolley buses, these trucks have arms that extended to connect to overhead wires. So large batteries are not always necessary.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

It will be a slow process to replace existing usage and infrastructure, but eventually most vehicles will be electric.

Cargo ships and large machinery will likely continue to run on gas and diesel, but ie. 85-90% of consumer travel will be electric.

And other solutions will play a role too. ie. Germany is already building electric lanes on highways so delivery trucks can run on grid power, like trolley buses, so large batteries are not necessary.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

It will be a slow process to replace existing usage and infrastructure, but eventually most vehicles will be electric.

Cargo ships and large machinery will likely continue to run on gas and diesel, but ie. 85-90% of consumer travel will be electric.

Germany is already building electric lanes on highways so delivery trucks can run on grid power, like trolley buses, so large batteries are not necessary.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

It will be a slow process to replace existing usage and infrastructure, but eventually most vehicles will be electric.

Cargo ships and large machinery will likely continue to run on gas and diesel, but ie. 85-90% of consumer travel will be electric.

Germany is already building electric lanes on highways so delivery trucks can run on grid power, like trolley buses.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

It will be a slow process to replace existing usage and infrastructure, but eventually most vehicles will be electric.

Cargo ships and large machinery will likely continue to run on gas and diesel, but ie. 85-90% of consumer travel will be electric.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

It will be a slow process to replace existing usage and infrastructure, but eventually most vehicles will be electric.

Cargo ships and large machinery will likely continue to run on gas and diesel, but ie. 85% of consumer travel will be mostly electric.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (ie. instead of daily, only refueled every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks and gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (instead of daily, goes down to every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks abd gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (instead of daily, goes down to every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200+ miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks abd gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (instead of daily, goes down to every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location. Works in the winter too, only very overcast/snow days interrupt production.

A 60 kwh battery is 200 miles of distance.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks abd gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (instead of daily, goes down to every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.

Solar is indeed capable of charging a vehicle. 10 kwh of solar, that you can mount on the roof, can produce 40-60 kwh a day, dependent on location.

A 60 kwh battery is 200 miles of distance. Works in the winter too, only very overcast days interrupt production.

Not even mentioning upcoming lightweight vehicles like Aptera that get 700-1000 miles on 50 kwh.

Support that with nuclear.

Even using natural gas to generate electricity will produce less emissions than gasoline vehicles.

Even having a coal/oil plant generate electricity to charge vehicles, will reduce emissions, because people can fill-up at home, which eliminate an entire distribution network of last-mile transport trucks abd gas stations.

As electric car usage increases, gas stations will be fueled less often (instead of daily, goes down to every 3rd day). Which means less trucks burning emissions to deliver gasoline.

More efficient to use trains to deliver coal to power plants in large loads, rather than thousands of trucks delivering gasoline nationwide every day.