I think she is complict in the game played. She became erratic in the later strategy offered, purposefully throwing it, by becoming absurd. Instead of trying to appeal too anybody stuck in the middle.

Of course, she had too. It's also part of the game. They have to be opposite. If one says this, the other must do the opposite.

But if they have a bar, and a hammer over her head. Court, jail, or worse. Was she anything more than a dog whistle.

It was rigged. He didn't gain popularity. But she lost it. Not that she ever had the status quo. But he never had the majority. All of a sudden in an election year. He gained those numbers. They could only hate the opposition more, according to an easier narrative. Because that game rigs it, look at the choice, it's not accidental. What happened to anybody else? She is therefore complict.

I think she is complict in the game played. She became erratic in the later strategy offered, purposefully throwing it, by becoming absurd. Instead of trying to appeal to anybody stuck in the middle.

Of course, she had too. It's also part of the game. They have to be opposite. If one says this, the other must do the opposite.

But if they have a bar, and a hammer over her head. Court, jail, or worse. Was she anything more than a dog whistle.

It was rigged. He didn't gain popularity. But she lost it. Not that she ever had the status quo. But he never had the majority. All of a sudden in an election year. He gained those numbers. They could only hate the opposition more, according to an easier narrative. Because that game rigs it, look at the choice, it's not accidental. What happened to anybody else? She is therefore complict.

I think she is complict in the game played. She became erratic in the later strategy offered, purposefully throwing it, by becoming absurd. Instead of trying to appeal to anybody stuck in the middle.

Of course, she had too. It's also part of the game. They have to be opposite. If one says this, the other must do the opposite.

But if they have a bar, and a hammer over her head. Court, jail, or worse. Was she anything more than a dog whistle.

It was rigged. He didn't gain popularity. But she lost it. Not that she ever had the status quo. But he never had the majority. All of a sudden in an election year. He gained those numbers. The could only hate the opposition more, according to an easier narrative. Because that game rigs it, look at the choice, it's not accidental. What happened to anybody else? She is therefore complict.

I think she is complict in the game played. She became erratic in the later strategy offered, purposefully throwing it, by becoming absurd. I stead of trying to appeal to anybody stuck in the middle.

Of course, she had too. It's also part of the game. They have to be opposite. If one says this, the other must do the opposite.

But if they have a bar, and a hammer over her head. Court, jail, or worse. Was she anything more than a dog whistle.

It was rigged. He didn't gain popularity. But she lost it. Not that she ever had the status quo.