But by reason a democracy unlike a dictatorship, communism, socialist republic, has free speech. It has political parties debating and governing and electing free speech. It therefore doesn't control speech or what people think. By reasoning.

The same with capitalism, it has free enterprise, where you should have as much right to capitial gain as any other market, like twitter.

There is no controlling what people think, that is unconstitutional, and it is a traitorous comment. It shouldn't be said at all. It is seditious. In fact it's a lawsuit. Sue them for it. Sue them to hell. They've openly admitted plagiarism, bigotry, and prejudice. They're not our morality.

But there is unlawful speech, this has often become absurd laws today, unconstitionally away from the founding charters, and suggestively opposing nations targeting your own, they shouldn't be on the national domains if they're so "concerned".

But by reason a democracy unlike a dictatorship, communism, socialist republic, has free speech. It has political parties debating and governing and electing free speech. It therefore doesn't control speech or what people think. By reasoning.

The same with capitalism, it has free enterprise, where you should have as much right to capitial gain as any other market, like twitter.

There is no controlling what people think, that it is unconstitutional, and it is a traitorous comment. It shouldn't be said at all. It is seditious. In fact it's a lawsuit. Sue them for it. Sue them to hell. They've openly admitted plagiarism, bigotry, and prejudice. They're not our morality.

But there is unlawful speech, this has often become absurd laws today, unconstitionally away from the founding charters, and suggestively opposing nations targeting your own, they shouldn't be on the national domains if they're so "concerned".

But by reason a democracy unlike a dictatorship, communism, socialist republic, has free speech. It has political parties debating and governing and electing free speech. It therefore doesn't control speech or what people think. By reasoning.

The same with capitalism, it has free enterprise, where you should have as much right to capitial gain as any other market, like twitter.

There is no controlling what people think, that it is unconstitutional, and it is a traitorous comment. It shouldn't be said at all. It is seditious.

But there is unlawful speech, this has often become absurd laws today, unconstitionally away from the founding charters, and suggestively opposing nations targeting your own, they shouldn't be on the national domains if they're so "concerned".

But by reason a democracy unlike a dictatorship, communism, socialist republic, has free speech. It has political parties debating and governing and electing free speech. It therefore doesn't control speech or what people think. By reasoning.

The same with capitalism, it has free enterprise, where you should have as much right to capital gain as any other market, like twitter.

There is no controlling what people think, that it is unconstitutional, and it is a traitorous comment. It shouldn't be said at all. It is seditious.

But there is unlawful speech, this has often become absurd laws today, unconstitionally away from the founding charters, and suggestively opposing nations targeting your own, they shouldn't be on the national domains if they're so "concerned".