Stew Peters brings on a doctor who either doesn't know how to read, or is a disinfo agent, Dr. Ariyana Love. She claims Ebola and Marburg virus are in the COVID J&J vaccines AND that the vaccines modify specific human genes producing effectively AIDS.
The patents she is referring to are vaccines for Ebola and Marburg. That is why they contain their proteins. Wouldn't that be obvious to a doctor?
administering to the subject, as a priming vaccination, an immunologically effective amount of a recombinant adenovirus vector comprising a polynucleotide encoding a filovirus antigenic protein
The filovirus protein can be from Ebola OR Marburg or any other such virus. That is how the technology works, even midwit redditors know that, but this doctor doesn't.
In regards to gene deletion, whether it happens or or not there is no such evidence in the patent as she claims. The patent is saying the VIRUS has certain genes deleted.
In some embodiments, the adenovirus is replication deficient, e.g., because it contains a deletion in the E1 region of the genome
For E2- and/or E4-mutated adenoviruses, generally E2- and/or E4-complementing cell lines are used to generate recombinant adenoviruses.
How could anyone miss that?? It says it is the virus' E1 genes not humans. I'm not saying these can modify DNA or not, but I am saying that her claim is based on at best a misreading of the patent (but again I don't see how should could have read any of the patent and thought it said human DNA).
For Stew Peters, I appreciate what he is trying to do but he needs to learn how to be a wiser journalist and vet his guests. He must make sure what they say can be verified so you don't make an ass out of yourself and your audience. This isn't the first time Stew Peters has jumped the gun and looked like an ass.
Stew Peters brings on a doctor who either doesn't know how to read, or is a disinfo agent, Dr. Ariyana Love.
The patents she is referring to are vaccines for Ebola and Marburg. That is why they contain their proteins. Wouldn't that be obvious to a doctor?
administering to the subject, as a priming vaccination, an immunologically effective amount of a recombinant adenovirus vector comprising a polynucleotide encoding a filovirus antigenic protein
The filovirus protein can be from Ebola OR Marburg or any other such virus. That is how the technology works, even midwit redditors know that, but this doctor doesn't.
In regards to gene deletion, whether it happens or or not there is no such evidence in the patent as she claims. The patent is saying the VIRUS has certain genes deleted.
In some embodiments, the adenovirus is replication deficient, e.g., because it contains a deletion in the E1 region of the genome
For E2- and/or E4-mutated adenoviruses, generally E2- and/or E4-complementing cell lines are used to generate recombinant adenoviruses.
How could anyone miss that?? It says it is the virus' E1 genes not humans. I'm not saying these can modify DNA or not, but I am saying that her claim is based on at best a misreading of the patent (but again I don't see how should could have read any of the patent and thought it said human DNA).
For Stew Peters, I appreciate what he is trying to do but he needs to learn how to be a wiser journalist and vet his guests. He must make sure what they say can be verified so you don't make an ass out of yourself and your audience. This isn't the first time Stew Peters has jumped the gun and looked like an ass.
Stew Peters brings on a doctor who either doesn't know how to read, or is a disinfo agent, Dr. Ariyana Love.
The patents she is referring to are vaccines for Ebola and Marburg. That is why they contain their proteins. Wouldn't that be obvious to a doctor?
administering to the subject, as a priming vaccination, an immunologically effective amount of a recombinant adenovirus vector comprising a polynucleotide encoding a filovirus antigenic protein
The filovirus protein can be from Ebola OR Marburg or any other such virus. That is how the technology works, even midwit redditors know that, but this doctor doesn't.
In regards to gene deletion, whether it happens or or not there is no such evidence in the patent as she claims. The patent is saying the VIRUS has certain genes deleted.
In some embodiments, the adenovirus is replication deficient, e.g., because it contains a deletion in the E1 region of the genome
For E2- and/or E4-mutated adenoviruses, generally E2- and/or E4-complementing cell lines are used to generate recombinant adenoviruses.
How could anyone miss that?? It says it is the virus' E1 genes not humans. I'm not saying these can modify DNA or not, but I am saying that her claim is based on at best a misreading of the patent (but again I don't see how should could have read any of the patent and thought it said human DNA).
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140017278A1/en
For Stew Peters, I appreciate what he is trying to do but he needs to learn how to be a wiser journalist and vet his guests. He must make sure what they say can be verified so you don't make an ass out of yourself and your audience. This isn't the first time Stew Peters has jumped the gun and looked like an ass.
Stew Peters brings on a doctor who either doesn't know how to read, or is a disinfo agent, Dr. Ariyana Love.
The patents she is referring to are vaccines for Ebola and Marburg. That is why they contain their proteins. Wouldn't that be obvious to a doctor?
administering to the subject, as a priming vaccination, an immunologically effective amount of a recombinant adenovirus vector comprising a polynucleotide encoding a filovirus antigenic protein
The filovirus protein can be from Ebola OR Marburg or any other such virus. That is how the technology works, even midwit redditors know that, but this doctor doesn't.
In regards to gene deletion, whether it happens or or not there is no such evidence in the patent as she claims. The patent is saying the VIRUS has certain genes deleted.
In some embodiments, the adenovirus is replication deficient, e.g., because it contains a deletion in the E1 region of the genome
For E2- and/or E4-mutated adenoviruses, generally E2- and/or E4-complementing cell lines are used to generate recombinant adenoviruses.
How could anyone miss that?? It says it is the virus' E1 genes not humans. I'm not saying these can modify DNA or not, but I am saying that her claim is based on at best a misreading of the patent (but again I don't see how should could have read any of the patent and thought it said human DNA).
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140017278A1/en
For Stew Peters, I appreciate what he is trying to do but he needs to learn how to be a wiser journalist and vet his guests. He must make sure what they say can be verified so you don't make an ass out of yourself and your audience. This isn't the first time Stew Peters has jumped the gun and looked like an ass.
Stew Peters interview with Dr Ariyana Love -> https://tv.gab.com/channel/realstewpeters/view/doctor-marburg-aids-ebola-in-vaxx-618d6e68b3d7d282f9f12e9e