Polaris is a constellation identified by looking for it to point north. But as an example if I built something under it, has that position change over time. Yes absolutely. But it doesn't mean I cannot look for that constellation of the Big Dipper identifying it to point North. Understand? So when they placed the Pyramids in what is assumed to be True North has that position moved. Absolutely. The same as other constellations they perhaps made drawings of the sky then like the Sun Disk in the Louvre which stirred a huge debate for about a century of the age of it. They based the debate on what that sky was then. Another example of perhaps Gobekli Tepe how it arranged under the sky.

Fired this off quickly, mum fell over A/E, had to dash. Has that sky changed by rotation but is the sun fixed. A debate for somebody else. I have provided fact. Sun Disk, Gobekli Tepe. But aren't the pyramids still under Orion. That sky has debatably changed over time by rotation and orbit. Alignment of the age of the Sun Disk highlighted different celestial positioning then what is observed today. The same as other such markings.

Polaris is fixed North it will always be North. What is North, Canada, Russia, Greenland, where do you pinpoint it. The Arctic circle. But. True North is Drifting? Drifting by miles. As a debate on the Sun Disk look at the constellations which highlighted the sky on its drawings. It then puts a date of it, on what was observed. Originally dated before Egypt was born, 10000 odd years or over ago, like the Sphinx debates now. But then they perhaps failed, because the Vatican simply declared Rome invented iron, and everybody else was clay. No recording past 5000 years ago. The pyramids still being under Orion, a fixed point. Supposedly according to the pyramid code, the center of the planet and under direct geological alignment. But hasn't that time zone changed, ironically or otherwise?

Polaris is a constellation identified by looking for it to point north. But as an example if I built something under it, has that position change over time. Yes absolutely. But it doesn't mean I cannot look for that constellation of the Big Dipper identifying it to point North. Understand? So when they placed the Pyramids in what is assumed to be True North has that position moved. Absolutely. The same as other constellations they perhaps made drawings of the sky then like the Sun Disk in the Louvre which stirred a huge debate for about a century of the age of it. They based the debate on what that sky was then. Another example of perhaps Gobekli Tepe how it arranged under the sky.

Fired this off quickly, mum fell over A/E, had to dash. Has that sky changed by rotation but is the sun fixed. A debate for somebody else. I have provided fact. Sun Disk, Gobekli Tepe. But aren't the pyramids still under Orion. That sky has debatably changed over time by rotation and orbit. Alignment of the age of the Sun Disk highlighted different celestial positioning then what is observed today. The same as other such markings.

Polaris is fixed North it will always be North. What is North, Canada, Russia, Greenland, where do you pinpoint it. The Arctic circle. But. True North is Drifting? Drifting by miles. As a debate on the Sun Disk look at the constellations which highlighted the sky on its drawings. It then puts a date of it, on what was observed. Originally dated before Egypt was born, 10000 odd years or over ago, like the Sphinx debates now. But then they perhaps failed, because the Vatican simply declared Rome invented iron, and everybody else was clay. No recording past 5000 years ago. The pyramids still being under Orion, a fixed point. Supposedly according to the pyramid code, the center of the planet and under direct geological alignment. But hasn't that time zone changed. Ironically or otherwise?

Polaris is a constellation identified by looking for it to point north. But as an example if I built something under it, has that position change over time. Yes absolutely. But it doesn't mean I cannot look for that constellation of the Big Dipper identifying it to point North. Understand? So when they placed the Pyramids in what is assumed to be True North has that position moved. Absolutely. The same as other constellations they perhaps made drawings of the sky then like the Sun Disk in the Louvre which stirred a huge debate for about a century of the age of it. They based the debate on what that sky was then. Another example of perhaps Gobekli Tepe how it arranged under the sky.

Fired this off quickly, mum fell over A/E, had to dash. Has that sky changed by rotation but is the sun fixed. A debate for somebody else. I have provided fact. Sun Disk, Gobekli Tepe. But aren't the pyramids still under Orion. That sky has debatably changed over time by rotation and orbit. Alignment of the age of the Sun Disk highlighted different celestial positioning then what is observed today. The same as other such markings.

Polaris is fixed North it will always be North. What is North, Canada, Russia, Greenland, where do you pinpoint it. The Arctic circle. But. True North is Drifting? Drifting by miles. As a debate on the Sun Disk look at the constellations which highlighted the sky on its drawings. It then puts a date of it, on what was observed. Originally dated before Egypt was born, 10000 odd years or over ago, like the Sphinx debates now. But then they perhaps failed, because the Vatican simply declared Rome invented Iron, and everybody else was clay. No recording past 5000 years ago. The pyramids still being under Orion a fixed point. Supposedly according to the pyramid code the center of the planet and under direct geological alignment. But hasn't that time zone changed?

Polaris is a constellation identified by looking for it to point north. But as an example if I built something under it, has that position change over time. Yes absolutely. But it doesn't mean I cannot look for that constellation of the Big Dipper identifying it to point North. Understand? So when they placed the Pyramids in what is assumed to be True North has that position moved. Absolutely. The same as other constellations they perhaps made drawings of the sky then like the Sun Disk in the Louvre which stirred a huge debate for about a century of the age of it. They based the debate on what that sky was then. Another example of perhaps Gobekli Tepe how it arranged under the sky.

Fired this off quickly, mum fell over A/E, had to dash. Has that sky changed by rotation but is the sun fixed. A debate for somebody else. I have provided fact. Sun Disk, Gobekli Tepe. But aren't the pyramids still under Orion. That sky has debatably changed over time by rotation and orbit. Alignment of the age of the Sun Disk highlighted different celestial positioning then what is observed today. The same as other such markings.

Polaris is fixed North it will always be North. What is North, Canada, Russia, Greenland, where do you pinpoint it. The Arctic circle. But. True North is Drifting? Drifting by miles. As a debate on the Sun Disk look at the constellations which highlighted the sky on its drawings. It then puts a date of it, on what was observed. Originally dated before Egypt was born, 10000 odd years or over ago, like the Sphinx debates now. But then they perhaps failed, because the Vatican simply declared Rome invented Iron, and everybody else was clay. No recording past 5000 years ago.

Polaris is a constellation identified by looking for it to point north. But as an example if I built something under it, has that position change over time. Yes absolutely. But it doesn't mean I cannot look for that constellation of the Big Dipper identifying it to point North. Understand? So when they placed the Pyramids in what is assumed to be True North has that position moved. Absolutely. The same as other constellations they perhaps made drawings of the sky then like the Sun Disk in the Louvre which stirred a huge debate for about a century of the age of it. They based the debate on what that sky was then. Another example of perhaps Gobekli Tepe how it arranged under the sky.

Fired this off quickly, mum fell over A/E, had to dash. Has that sky changed by rotation but is the sun fixed. A debate for somebody else. I have provided fact. Sun Disk, Gobekli Tepe. But aren't the pyramids still under Orion. That sky has debatably changed over time by rotation and orbit. Alignment of the age of the Sun Disk highlighted different celestial positioning then what is observed today. The same as other such markings.

Polaris is fixed North it will always be North. What is North, Canada, Russia, Greenland, where do you pinpoint it. The Arctic circle. But. True North is Drifting? Drifting by miles. As a debate on the Sun Disk look at the constellations which highlighted the sky on its drawings it then puts a date of it on what was observed. Originally dated before Egypt was born like the sphinx debates now. But then they perhaps failed because the Vatican simply declared Rome invented Iron, and everybody else was clay. No recording past 5000 years ago.

Polaris is a constellation identified by looking for it to point north. But as an example if I built something under it, has that position change over time. Yes absolutely. But it doesn't mean I cannot look for that constellation of the Big Dipper identifying it to point North. Understand? So when they placed the Pyramids in what is assumed to be True North has that position moved. Absolutely. The same as other constellations they perhaps made drawings of the sky then like the Sun Disk in the Louvre which stirred a huge debate for about a century of the age of it. They based the debate on what that sky was then. Another example of perhaps Gobekli Tepe how it arranged under the sky.

Fired this off quickly, mum fell over A/E, had to dash. Has that sky changed by rotation but is the sun fixed. A debate for somebody else. I have provided fact. Sun Disk, Gobekli Tepe. But aren't the pyramids still under Orion. That sky has debatably changed over time by rotation and orbit. Alignment of the age of the Sun Disk highlighted different celestial positioning then what is observed today. The same as other such markings.

Polaris is a constellation identified by looking for it to point north. But as an example if I built something under it, has that position change over time. Yes absolutely. But it doesn't mean I cannot look for that constellation of the Big Dipper identifying it to point North. Understand? So when they placed the Pyramids in what is assumed to be True North has that position moved. Absolutely. The same as other constellations they perhaps made drawings of the sky then like the Sun Disk in the Louvre which stirred a huge debate for about a century of the age of it. They based the debate on what that sky was then. Another example of perhaps Gobekli Tepe how it arranged under the sky.

Fired this off quickly, mum fell over A/E, had to dash. Has that sky changed by rotation but is the sun fixed. A debate for somebody else. I have provided fact. Sun Disk, Gobekli Tepe. But aren't the pyramids still under Orion.

Polaris is a constellation identified by looking for it to point north. But as an example if I built something under it, has that position change over time. Yes absolutely. But it doesn't mean I cannot look for that constellation of the Big Dipper identifying it to point North. Understand? So when they placed the Pyramids in what is assumed to be True North has that position moved. Absolutely. The same as other constellations they perhaps made drawings of the sky then like the Sun Disk in the Louvre which stirred a huge debate for about a century of the age of it. They based the debate on what that sky was then. Another example of perhaps Gobekli Tepe how it arranged under the sky.