This is incorrect.

It wasn't until four days and nearly 14 messages later that a mod specified saying a 'transgender woman is a biological male' was the reason for the ban.

Up until that point all I received was evasion, mental gymnastics, blame shifting, dodging, projection, and gaslighting from the mod.

Claiming to have permanently banned a user because similar posts were deemed a TOS violation is an ambiguous dodge that does nothing to explain the exact infringement by the user.

Let's assume you were the mod.

In my case it was the equivalent of blaming the victim for saying the sky is blue which is a factual statement and then refusing to acknowledge you banned the user for saying the sky is blue, but ambiguously telling the user that their submission was a TOS violation and linking to 'hate speech'. Saying 'the sky is blue' is hate speech? Are we also banning people for saying the earth is round?

Meanwhile you ignore that the person was willing to compromise and you again refuse to tell them exactly what offended you so there will be no future misunderstanding.

Again the admin didn't ban me or contact me. It was a mod.

Say you post a picture of Joe Biden being incompetent then write a submission statement saying some people might think Joe is incompetent, old, and looks to be losing his mind. I'm a mod, and I perm ban you claiming it's a TOS violation because I say similar posts were banned. You ask what exactly was wrong with the submission. I repeat stating it's a TOS violation and link to some ambiguous text claiming 'hate speech'. That doesn't tell you what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and attempts to pass the blame to Admin without explaining the infringement.

I've done nothing to harm r/conspiracy, if anything they've harmed their own community by not being open about banned topics while running private blacklists and banning people for wrongthink

You have done nothing but harm their community and you are still doing so.

This is nonsense. The mods wanted me to make a false admission stating that I committed a TOS violation. I disagreed.

I did however say I was willing to compromise if they explained what was the violation.

I gave the mods every opportunity to list the ban justification, and asked for a list of banned topics so I could compromise and follow their rules. They refused. The mods also rebuffed any suggestion that they should be open with the list of banned topics instead of running a honeypot and banning users for violating topics on private blacklists.

If the mods had not perm banned me for making a factual scientific statement while raising the question if CIS women felt disenfranchised about transgender women receiving women's awards we would not be at this juncture. This topic is not going away.

Similarly had a mod not played games and accepted that I was attempting to compromise and had been honest, I might not have typed this self.text to warn others about the duplicity taking place.

This is incorrect.

It wasn't until four days and nearly 14 messages later that a mod specified saying a 'transgender woman is a biological male' was the reason for the ban.

Up until that point all I received was evasion, mental gymnastics, blame shifting, dodging, projection, and gaslighting from the mod.

Claiming to have permanently banned a user because similar posts were deemed a TOS violation is an ambiguous dodge that does nothing to explain the exact infringement by the user.

Let's assume you were the mod.

In my case it was the equivalent of blaming the victim for saying the sky is blue which is a factual statement and then refusing to acknowledge you banned the user for saying the sky is blue, but ambiguously telling the user that their submission was a TOS violation and linking to 'hate speech'. Saying 'the sky is blue' is hate speech? Are we also banning people for saying the earth is round?

Meanwhile you ignore that the person was willing to compromise and you again refuse to tell them exactly what offended you so there will be no future misunderstanding.

Again the admin didn't ban me or contact me. It was a mod.

Say you post a picture of Joe Biden being incompetent then write a submission statement saying some people might think Joe is incompetent, old, and looks to be losing his mind. I'm a mod, and I perm ban you claiming it's a TOS violation because I say similar posts were banned. You ask what exactly was wrong with the submission. I repeat stating it's a TOS violation and link to some ambiguous text claiming 'hate speech'. That doesn't tell you what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and attempts to pass the blame to Admin without explaining the infringement.

I've done nothing to harm r/conspiracy, if anything they've harmed their own community by not being open about banned topics while running private blacklists and banning people for wrongthink

You have done nothing but harm their community and you are still doing so.

This is nonsense. The mods wanted me to make a false admission stating that I committed a TOS violation. I disagreed.

I did however say I was willing to compromise if they explained what was the violation.

I gave the mods every opportunity to list the ban justification, and asked for a list of banned topics so I could compromise and follow their rules. They refused. The mods also rebuffed any suggestion that they should be open with the list of banned topics instead of running a honeypot and banning users for violating topics on private blacklists.

If the mods had not perm banned me for making a factual scientific statement we would not be at this juncture. Similarly had a mod not played games accepted that I was attempting to compromise and had been honest, I might not have typed this self.text to warn others about the duplicity taking place.

This is incorrect.

It wasn't until four days and nearly 14 messages later that a mod specified saying a 'transgender woman is a biological male' was the reason for the ban.

Up until that point all I received was evasion, mental gymnastics, blame shifting, dodging, projection, and gaslighting from the mod.

Saying we banned you because similar posts were deemed a TOS violation is a dodge that does nothing to explain the exact infringement.

It was the equivalent of blaming the victim for saying the sky is blue which is a factual statement and then refusing to acknowledge you banned the user for saying the sky is blue. Meanwhile you ignore that the person was willing to compromise and you again refuse to tell them what offended you so there will be no future misunderstanding.

Again the admin didn't ban me or contact me. It was a mod.

Say you post a picture of Joe Biden being incompetent then write a submission statement saying some people might think Joe is incompetent., I'm a mod, and I perm ban you claiming it's a TOS violation because similar posts were banned. You ask what exactly was wrong with the submission. I repeat stating it's a TOS violation and link to some ambiguous text claiming 'hate speech'. That doesn't tell you what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and attempts to pass the blame to Admin without explaining the infringement.

I've done nothing to harm r/conspiracy, if anything they've harmed their own community by not being open about banned topics while running private blacklists and banning people for wrongthink

You have done nothing but harm their community and you are still doing so.

This is nonsense. The mods wanted me to make a false statement that I committed a TOS violation. I disagree.

I also gave the mods every opportunity to list the ban justification, and ask for a list of banned topics so I could compromise and follow their rules. They refused. The mods also rebuffed any suggestion that they should be open with the list of banned topics instead of running a honeypot and banning users for violating topics on private blacklists.

If the mods had not perm banned me for making a factual scientific statement we would not be at this juncture. Similarly had a mod not played games accepted that I was attempting to compromise and had been honest, I might not have typed this self.text to warn others about the duplicity taking place.

This is incorrect.

It wasn't until four days and nearly 14 messages later that a mod specified saying a 'transgender woman is a biological male' was the reason for the ban.

Up until that point all I received was evasion, mental gymnastics, blame shifting, dodging, projection, and gaslighting from the mod.

Saying we banned you because similar posts were deemed a TOS violation is a dodge that does nothing to explain the exact infringement.

It was the equivalent of blaming the victim for saying the sky is blue which is a factual statement and then refusing to acknowledge you banned the user for saying the sky is blue. Meanwhile you ignore that the person was willing to compromise and you again refuse to tell them what offended you so there will be no future misunderstanding.

Say you post a picture of Joe Biden being incompetent then write a submission statement saying some people might think Joe is incompetent., I'm a mod, and I perm ban you claiming it's a TOS violation because similar posts were banned. You ask what exactly was wrong with the submission. I repeat stating it's a TOS violation and link to some ambiguous text claiming 'hate speech'. That doesn't tell you what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and attempts to pass the blame to Admin without explaining the infringement.

I've done nothing to harm r/conspiracy, if anything they've harmed their own community by not being open about banned topics while running private blacklists and banning people for wrongthink

This is incorrect.

It wasn't until four days and nearly 14 messages later that a mod specified saying a 'transgender woman is a biological male' was the reason for the ban.

Up until that point all I received was evasion, mental gymnastics, blame shifting, dodging, projection, and gaslighting.

Saying we banned you because similar posts were deemed a TOS violation is a dodge that does nothing to explain the exact infringement.

Say you post a picture of Joe Biden is incompetent, I'm a mod, and I perm ban you claiming it's a TOS violation because similar posts were banned. That doesn't tell you what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and attempts to pass the blame to Admin without explaining the infringement.

I've done nothing to harm r/conspiracy, if anything they've harmed their own community by not being open about banned topics while running private blacklists and banning people for wrongthink