I am just going to say you're retarded.

There is no other description.

I will refer you to the battle of Stalingrad. For those tactics.

Okay but at which point haven't you understood it?

A city like Kiev was the 6th largest in Europe. The second city in Ukraine is Kharkiv. At which point haven't you understood how they're used by the tactics engaged? They take time to capture. It requires a huge effort. Easier today with the tools a modern army uses. But they quickly halt advances. Despite supposedly beating an army on the field. That city is also using modern army tools. Like radar jammers, drones, snipers, rockets air and land, and mortar, dead zones, boobytraps, hidden access, cover, bunkers, and is primarily dug in. Cities those ugly things are rebuilt overnight, look after WW2. Except for the rules and taboos for things like historical monuments and hospitals, schools etc. But it doesn't stop a nation using whatever means to defend itself.

I can even get into those tactics more. Shall we entertain the propaganda. How it is quickly deployed. How indeed it attempts to bog down. How it then sanctions. But quickly presents even more armaments, funding, and calls for greater support. The entire time is exhausting and harassing an attacker.

You can imagine like Israel hitting Palestine. A conversation I had about it with somebody else attempting explanation. Radar pings where a rocket or sniper has fired, any coordinates are automatically calibrated to return fire. An enemy is using human shields. Suddenly they've hit a civilian. Now let's suggest that enemy is far more advanced and has radar jammers, whoops, return fire has suddenly hit a Babushka, while it's operating all kind of drones, having also dug itself in with tunnels and bunkers, metro style tunnels, big enough to hide civilian population, but they're making munitions for any military.

Have you understood it, yet?

I am just going to say you're retarded.

There is no other description.

I will refer you the battle of Stalingrad. For those tactics.

Okay but at which point haven't you understood it?

A city like Kiev was the 6th largest in Europe. The second city in Ukraine is Kharkiv. At which point haven't you understood how they're used by the tactics engaged? They take time to capture. It requires a huge effort. Easier today with the tools a modern army uses. But they quickly halt advances. Despite supposedly beating an army on the field. That city is also using modern army tools. Like radar jammers, drones, snipers, rockets air and land, and mortar, dead zones, boobytraps, hidden access, cover, bunkers, and is primarily dug in. Cities those ugly things are rebuilt overnight, look after WW2. Except for the rules and taboos for things like historical monuments and hospitals, schools etc. But it doesn't stop a nation using whatever means to defend itself.

I can even get into those tactics more. Shall we entertain the propaganda. How it is quickly deployed. How indeed it attempts to bog down. How it then sanctions. But quickly presents even more armaments, funding, and calls for greater support. The entire time is exhausting and harassing an attacker.

You can imagine like Israel hitting Palestine. A conversation I had about it with somebody else attempting explanation. Radar pings where a rocket or sniper has fired, any coordinates are automatically calibrated to return fire. An enemy is using human shields. Suddenly they've hit a civilian. Now let's suggest that enemy is far more advanced and has radar jammers, whoops, return fire has suddenly hit a Babushka, while it's operating all kind of drones, having also dug itself in with tunnels and bunkers, metro style tunnels, big enough to hide civilian population, but they're making munitions for any military.

Have you understood it, yet?

I am just going to say you're retarded.

There is no other description.

I will refer you the battle of Stalingrad. For those tactics.

Okay but at which point haven't you understood it?

A city like Kiev was the 6th largest in Europe. The second city in Ukraine is Kharkiv. At which point haven't you understood how they're used by the tactics engaged? They take time to capture. It requires a huge effort. Easier today with the tools a modern army uses. But they quickly halt advances. Despite supposedly beating an army on the field. That city is also using modern army tools. Like radar jammers, drones, snipers, rockets air and land, and mortar, dead zones, boobytraps, hidden access, cover, bunkers, and is primarily dug in. Cities those ugly things are rebuilt overnight, look after WW2. Except for the rules and taboos for things like historical monuments and hospitals, schools etc. But it doesn't stop a nation using whatever means to defend itself.

I can even get into those tactics more. Shall we entertain the propaganda. How it is quickly deployed. How indeed it attempts to bog down. How it then sanctions. But quickly presents even more armaments, funding, and calls for greater support. The entire time is exhausting and harassing an attacker.

You can imagine like Israel hitting Palestine. A conversation I had about it with somebody else attempting explanation. Radar pings where a rocket or sniper has fired, any coordinates are automatically calibrated to return fire. An enemy is using human shields. Suddenly they've hit a civilian. Now let's suggest that enemy is far more advanced and has radar jammers, whoops, return fire has suddenly hit a Babushka, while it's operating all kind of drones, having also dug itself in with tunnels and bunkers, metro style tunnels, big enough to hide a civilian population, but they're making munitions for any military.

Have you understood it, yet?

I am just going to say you're retarded.

There is no other description.

I will refer you the battle of Stalingrad. For those tactics.

Okay but at which point haven't you understood it?

A city like Kiev was the 6th largest in Europe. The second city in Ukraine is Kharkiv. At which point haven't you understood how they're used by the tactics engaged? They take time to capture. It requires a huge effort. Easier today with the tools a modern army uses. But they quickly halt advances. Despite supposedly beating an army on the field. That city is also using modern army tools. Like radar jammers, drones, snipers, rockets air and land, and mortar, dead zones, boobytraps, hidden access, cover, bunkers, and is primarily dug in. Cities those ugly things are rebuilt overnight, look after WW2. Except for the rules and taboos for things like historical monuments and hospitals, schools etc. But it doesn't stop a nation using whatever means to defend itself.

I can even get into those tactics more. Shall we entertain the propaganda. How it is quickly deployed. How indeed it attempts to bog down. How it then sanctions. But quickly presents even more armaments, funding, and calls for greater support. The entire time is exhausting and harassing an attacker.

You can imagine like Israel hitting Palestine. A conversation I had about it with somebody else attempting explanation. Radar pings where a rocket or sniper has fired, any coordinates are automatically calibrated to return fire. An enemy is using human shields. Suddenly they've hit. Now let's suggest that enemy is far more advanced and has radar jammers, whoops, return fire has suddenly hit a Babushka, while it's operating all kind of drones, having also dug itself in with tunnels and bunkers, metro style tunnels, big enough to hide a civilian population, but they're making munitions for any military.

Have you understood it, yet?

I am just going to say you're retarded.

There is no other description.

I will refer you the battle of Stalingrad. For those tactics.

Okay but at which point haven't you understood it?

A city like Kiev was the 6th largest in Europe. The second city in Ukraine is Kharkiv. At which point haven't you understood how they're used by the tactics engaged? They take time to capture. It requires a huge effort. Easier today with the tools a modern army uses. But they quickly halt advances. Despite supposedly beating an army on the field. That city is also using modern army tools. Like radar jammers, drones, snipers, rockets air and land, and mortar, dead zones, boobytraps, hidden access, cover, bunkers, and is primarily dug in. Cities those ugly things are rebuilt overnight, look after WW2. Except for the rules and taboos for things like historical monuments and hospitals, schools etc. But it doesn't stop a nation using whatever means to defend itself.

I am just going to say you're retarded.

There is no other description.

I will refer you the battle of Stalingrad. For those tactics.

Okay but at which point haven't you understood it?

A city like Kiev was the 6th largest in Europe. The second city in Ukraine is Kharkiv. At which point haven't you understood how they're used by the tactics engaged? They take time to capture. It requires a huge effort. Easier today with the tools a modern army uses. But they quickly halt advances. Despite supposedly beating an army on the field. That city is also using modern army tools. Like radar jammers, drones, snipers, rockets air and land, and mortar, dead zones, boobytraps, hidden access, cover, bunkers, and is primarily dug in. Cities those ugly things are rebuilt overnight, look after WW2. Except for the rules and taboos fir things like historical monuments and hospitals, schools. But it doesn't stop a nation using whatever means to defend itself.

I am just going to say you're retarded.

There is no other description.

I will refer you the battle of Stalingrad. For those tactics.

I am just going to say you're retarded.

There is no other description.