Oh jeeze. Thank you for the notification. I have read his books, many of them, and although some of what he said is kind of fringe, I think he was onto something. And we need motivated people to keep exploring the fringes of physics.

As science has progressed, in some cases it has made wrong turns and oversimplifications in some areas. It is in the little-explored edges that we make discoveries and advance our knowledge. Bearden correctly identified that for electromagnetism, we oversimplified going to Maxwell's equations, and there are still holes in E/M theory. The Russians have found some of the holes and have made weapons using the augmented theory. For example, there were reports and photos 50 years ago of mysterious domes of light over the ocean from weapons under test. The US has its own highly classified things of mysterious natures too.

Bearden was correct about some technology being suppressed, and some that way for at least 40 years now. In other things he was flat-out wrong, such as claiming that negative resistance generates energy. There, he misinterpreted electronics theory and electric network technology.

Oh jeeze. Thank you for the notification. I have read his books, many of them, and although some of what he said is kind of fringe, I think he was onto something. And we need motivated people to keep exploring the fringes of physics.

As science has progressed, in some cases it has made wrong turns and oversimplifications in some areas. It is in the little-explored edges that we make discoveries and advanced our knowledge. Bearden correctly identified that for electromagnetism, we oversimplified going to Maxwell's equations, and there are still holes in E/M theory. The Russians have found some of the holes and have made weapons using the augmented theory. For example, there were reports and photos 50 years ago of mysterious domes of light over the ocean from weapons under test. The US has its own highly classified things of mysterious natures too.

Bearden was correct about some technology being suppressed, and some that way for at least 40 years now. In other things he was flat-out wrong, such as claiming that negative resistance generates energy. There, he misinterpreted electronics theory and electric network technology.

Oh jeeze. Thank you for the notification. I have read his books, many of them, and although some of what he said is kind of fringe, I think he was onto something. And we need motivated people to keep exploring the fringes of physics.

He was correct about some technology being suppressed, and some that way for at least 40 years now.