Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I say this for context, not to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real, and these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
I'm saying HIV is an exosome because this is compatible with what Duesberg and Mullis were saying, and also another source I trust. You can treat "exosome" as another word for "virus", within the premise that our understanding of viruses has to be greatly improved.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real, and these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
I'm saying HIV is an exosome because this is compatible with what Duesberg and Mullis were saying, and also another source I trust. You can treat "exosome" as another word for "virus", within the premise that our understanding of viruses has to be greatly improved.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real, and these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
I'm saying HIV is an exosome because this is compatible with what Duesberg and Mullis were saying, and also another source I trust. You can treat "exosome" as another word for "virus", on the premise that our understanding of viruses has to be greatly improved.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real, and these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
I'm saying HIV is an exosome because this is compatible with what Duesberg and Mullis were saying, and also another source I trust. You can treat "exosome" as another word for "virus", in the view that our understanding of viruses has to be greatly improved.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real, and these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
I'm saying HIV is an exosome because this is compatible with what Duesberg and Mullis were saying, and also another source I trust. You can treat "exosome" as another word for "virus", on the premise that our understanding of viruses has to be greatly improved.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real, and these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
I'm saying HIV is an exosome because this is compatible with what Duesberg and Mullis were saying, and also another source I trust. You can treat "exosome" as another word for "virus", but pointing out the premise that our understanding of viruses has to be greatly improved.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real, and these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
I'm saying HIV is an exosome because this is compatible with what Duesberg and Mullis were saying, and also another source I trust.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real, and these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
I'm saying HIV is an exosome because this is compatible with what Duesberg and Mullis were saying, and also other sources I trust.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real, and these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real. Perhaps these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm suggesting we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. I would not be surprised if the evidence is real. Perhaps these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm saying we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. It is possible the evidence he found was real. Perhaps these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm saying we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.
This page makes available Peter Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
From Amazon's page for this book:
"We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book." --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Luc Montagnier was a good man. He doesn't strike me as someone who was compromised.
Are you aware he was also into homeopathy? He claimed to have convincing evidence of the efficacy of homeopathic treatments.
I do not say this to discredit. It is possible the evidence he found was real. Perhaps these treatments actually somehow work.
I'm saying we are blinded by a gaslighting campaign that goes back 100 years. This gaslighting campaign has inserted rotten elements into our understanding of health and medicine, and I believe virology has been greatly affected.