Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They don't condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (white imperialists did that but white imperialists =/= white nationalists). They don't act from the shadows: They'd rather kill, exile or loot the out-group overtly. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts, and can choose to oppose them. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They don't condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (white imperialists =/= white nationalists). They'd rather kill, exile or loot the out-group: an overt action. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts, and can choose to oppose them. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do engage in parasitic behavior (eg: British empire), but they don't rule from the shadows. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts except for a short while, and can choose to oppose them. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do engage in parasitic behavior (eg: British empire), but they don't rule from the shadows. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts except for a short while, and can choose to oppose them. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, rape, loot, or exile the out-group by hook or crook (eg: the invasion of Americas), but this is not done from the shadows. Hence, the out-group is usually not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, rape, loot, or exile the out-group by hook or crook (eg: the invasion of Americas), but this is not done from the shadows. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, rape, loot, or exile the out-group by hook or crook (eg: the invasion of Americas), but this is not done from the shadows. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, rape, loot, or exile the out-group (eg: the invasion of Americas). They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, rape, loot, or exile the out-group (as they did to mine). They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, rape, loot, or exile the out-group (as they did to mine). They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, rape, loot, or exile the out-group (as they did to mine). They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, rape, loot, or exile the out-group (as they did to mine). They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, or exile the out-group. They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, or exile the out-group. They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, or exile the out-group. They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what power-to-weight ratio is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, or exile the out-group. They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what power-to-weight ratio is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, or exile the out-group. They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, or exile the out-group. They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, or exile the out-group. They do not work from the shadows, and hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, rape or exile the out-group (such as what they did to my civilization), working in the open and not from the shadows. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, rape or exile the out-group (such as what they did to my civilization), working in the open and not from the shadows. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, rape or exile the out-group (such as what they did to my civilization), working in the open and not from the shadows. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts. And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior towards the out-group, AFAIK. They'd rather kill, loot, rape or exile the out-group (such as what they did to my civilization), working in the open and not from the shadows. And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but I keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but I keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but I keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but I keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his country into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but I keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his country into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but I keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his country into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews, but I keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his country into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews, but I keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his country into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews, but I keep my distance for my own safety.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his country into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible. Good power-to-weight ratio.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his country into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (moral constraints). And as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where Nazis are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his country into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, they were match for the global (white) powers who were working for a different master.

Not true. While nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world). They do not condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior.

And as you said, Jews have a head start.