Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

earthcurvature.com

You can calculate how much curve there should be over a given distance. This one requires a large body of water to test out, as a long stretch of land, however unlikely, COULD be flat and so I wouldn't want to rely on that for proof

You could test over land in a few different locations to significantly reduce the possibility that you are sampling over a large flat parcel of land every time, however unlikely that would be

We know water finds and maintains its level

What you want to do is stand on the coastline and spot a distant landmark; the further the better

Bring binoculars if you have them, really give yourself little room for doubt

With the naked eye on a clear day you should likely be able to see much further than 20 kms, easily

Even at 20kms you should be seeing about 95 feet of drop, meaning, anything shorter than 95 ft should be completely obstructed from view due to the curve of the earth

You can hit Google Maps and right click the screen to measure distance from a starting location to your landmarks you spotted

You will find that you can see the entire distant landmark 20kms away, the entire thing and even the ground running up to it

Zero curve, let alone the 100ft of drop there should be at that distance

Try another location and in a different direction, if you still aren't convinced

The second other easy one, would be the Coriolis effect which we have all heard of

The sniper that must account for the spin of the Earth (appx 1000mph at the equator, reducing in speed as you get further from the equator)

We all accept this as accurate. They've made movies about it.

Ask yourself why this same principle does not apply to airplanes, helicopters, hot air balloons or even birds

Those two examples should be more than enough evidence to blow holes through the spinning globe with a radius of 3959mi falsehood

Why would they do this? How could they possibly pull it off? And the other questions that you will be defending the globe lie with in your head

Skip all of that for now and focus on the two examples I gave

They contradict the foundation of the globe lie

Just pause and look at it, I promise I do not mean to mislead you

2 years ago
-1 score
Reason: Original

earthcurvature.com

You can calculate how much curve there should be over a given distance. This one requires a large body of water to test out, as a long stretch of land, however unlikely, COULD be flat and so I wouldn't want to rely on that for proof.

We know water finds and maintains its level

What you want to do is stand on the coastline and spot a distant landmark; the further the better

Bring binoculars if you have them, really give yourself little room for doubt

With the naked eye on a clear day you should likely be able to see much further than 20 kms, easily

Even at 20kms you should be seeing about 95 feet of drop, meaning, anything shorter than 95 ft should be completely obstructed from view due to the curve of the earth

You can hit Google Maps and right click the screen to measure distance from a starting location to your landmarks you spotted

You will find that you can see the entire distant landmark 20kms away, the entire thing and even the ground running up to it

Zero curve, let alone the 100ft of drop there should be at that distance

Try another location and in a different direction, if you still aren't convinced

The second other easy one, would be the Coriolis effect which we have all heard of

The sniper that must account for the spin of the Earth (appx 1000mph at the equator, reducing in speed as you get further from the equator)

We all accept this as accurate. They've made movies about it.

Ask yourself why this same principle does not apply to airplanes, helicopters, hot air balloons or even birds

Those two examples should be more than enough evidence to blow holes through the spinning globe with a radius of 3959mi falsehood

Why would they do this? How could they possibly pull it off? And the other questions that you will be defending the globe lie with in your head

Skip all of that for now and focus on the two examples I gave

They contradict the foundation of the globe lie

Just pause and look at it, I promise I do not mean to mislead you

2 years ago
1 score