Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. In order for a denser fluid to take the place of a less dense object and push it elsewhere, it needs a force to move it into place. Where does this force come from any why does it act only in one direction (pushing the less dense object upwards)?

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

EDIT: A theory is said to be 'wrong' if it is inconsistent with observations. Thus, a single counterexample is sufficient to demonstrate a theory is wrong. Also thus, if two theories both are consistent with all known observations, then neither can be said to be 'wrong'. Whether even one of them is the 'truth' is unknowable from said observations. Science only tells us when a theory is wrong, but cannot tell us when a theory is the truth.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. In order for a denser fluid to take the place of a less dense object and push it elsewhere, it needs a force to move it into place. Where does this force come from any why does it act only in one direction (pushing the less dense object upwards)?

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

EDIT: A theory is said to be 'wrong' if it is inconsistent with observations. Thus, a single counterexample is sufficient to demonstrate a theory is wrong. Also thus, if two theories both are consistent with all known observations, then neither can be said to be 'wrong'. Whether even one of them is the 'truth' is unknowable from said observations. Science only tells us when a theory is wrong, but cannot tell us when a theory is the truth.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. In order for a denser fluid to take the place of a less dense object and push it elsewhere, it needs a force to move it into place. Where does this force come from any why does it act only in one direction (pushing the less dense object upwards)?

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

EDIT: A theory is said to be 'wrong' if it is inconsistent with observations. Thus, a single counterexample is sufficient to must to demonstrate a theory is wrong. Also thus, if two theories both are consistent with all known observations, then neither can be said to be 'wrong'. Whether even one of them is the 'truth' is unknowable from said observations. Science only tells us when a theory is wrong, but cannot tell us when a theory is the truth.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. In order for a denser fluid to take the place of a less dense object and push it elsewhere, it needs a force to move it into place. Where does this force come from any why does it act only in one direction (pushing the less dense object upwards)?

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

EDIT: A theory is said to be 'wrong' if it is inconsistent with observations. Thus, a single counterexample is sufficient to must to demonstrate a theory is wrong. Also thus, if two theories both are consistent with all known observations, then neither can be said to be 'wrong'. Whether even one of them is 'true' is unknowable from said observations.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. In order for a denser fluid to take the place of a less dense object and push it elsewhere, it needs a force to move it into place. Where does this force come from any why does it act only in one direction (pushing the less dense object upwards)?

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

EDIT: A theory is said to be 'wrong' if it is inconsistent with observations. Thus, a single counterexample is sufficient to must to demonstrate a theory is wrong. Also thus, if two theories both are consistent with all known observations, then neither can be said to be 'wrong'. Whether even one of them is 'true' is unknowable from said observations.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. In order for a denser fluid to take the place of a less dense object and push it elsewhere, it needs a force to move it into place. Where does this force come from any why does it act only in one direction (pushing the less dense object upwards)?

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

EDIT: A theory must correctly predict relevant observable phenomena in order to be accepted. And a theory for which no counterexample can be found cannot be dismissed.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. In order for a denser fluid to take the place of a less dense object and push it, it needs a force to move it into place. Where does this force come from any why does it act only in one direction (pushing the less dense object upwards)?

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

EDIT: A theory must correctly predict relevant observable phenomena in order to be accepted. And a theory for which no counterexample can be found cannot be dismissed.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. In order for a denser fluid to take the place of a less dense object and push it, it needs a force to move it into place. Where does this force come from any why does it act only in one direction (pushing the less dense object upwards)?

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. In order for a denser fluid to take the place of a less dense object and push it, it needs a force to move it into place.

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity.

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.

Gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density and buoyancy

Bouyancy cannot exist without gravity. If you believe bouyancy exists, so must gravity.

“Space” isn’t what they say it is and the fact that we have our gaseous atmosphere against the vacuum of space with no hard barrier violates the second law of thermodynamics

Or there is another force (eg: gravity) keeping it in place.