Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

No references to 4chan were made here :)

EDIT:

The list of code words that the pizzagaters were peddling for years was litterally made up by some anon from 4chan.

Source needed :) The claim that code words were invented on 4chan is repeated by MSM without actually linking to the thread where this happened.

Also this is a common strawman strategy used by MSM to dismiss investigation into Pizzagate:

  1. Some 4chan users speculated about what certain words refer to. Claim: The code words were 'invented' on 4chan.
  2. Some social media users propagated it. Claim: Entire pizzagate narrative rests on said invention.
  3. Claim: Thus it is a hoax.

Whereas the truth is:

  1. False. The investigation done by one group of users irrelevant to the one done by another group, unless a direct reference is made to prior group. Each separate investigation must be answered separately. What happened on 4chan is irrelevant to what I am looking into.

    The 'code words' were not 'invented' on 4chan. They exist in the emails. The reason they were singled out is because the context they are used in does not fit with their literal meaning and implies they are code for something else (Example: See post above for usage of 'pizza').

    The 'code words' are first discussed in this post by me :) I'm "not aware" of what theories others might be peddling :) If you have concerns about their theories, kindly address it to them. I can only answer for my work.

  2. False. Again what one group of users propagates is irrelevant to what another group propagates, unless there a direct reference is made to prior group. It is a sad attempt at caricaturing the entire group, to avoid looking at details on a case-by-case basis.

  3. Keep repeating the claim "it is a hoax" while not even addressing the evidence directly does not make it true. Address the evidence directly, then we can talk. I can talk about specifics, but not vague generalities.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No references to 4chan were made here :)

EDIT:

The list of code words that the pizzagaters were peddling for years was litterally made up by some anon from 4chan.

Source needed :) The claim that code words were invented on 4chan is repeated by MSM without actually linking to the thread where this happened.

Also this is a common strawman strategy used by MSM to dismiss investigation into Pizzagate:

  1. Some 4chan users speculated about what certain words refer to. Claim: The code words were 'invented' on 4chan.
  2. Some social media users propagated it. Claim: Entire pizzagate narrative rests on said invention.
  3. Claim: Thus it is a hoax.

Whereas the truth is:

  1. False. The investigation done by one group of users irrelevant to the one done by another group, unless a direct reference is made to prior group. Each separate investigation must be answered separately. What happened on 4chan is irrelevant to what I am looking into.

    The 'code words' were not 'invented' on 4chan. They exist in the emails. The reason they were singled out is because the context they are used in does not fit with their literal meaning and implies they are code for something else (Example: See post above for usage of 'pizza').

    The 'code words' are first discussed in this post by me :) I'm "not aware" of what theories others might be peddling :) If you have concerns about their theories, kindly address it to them. I can only answer for my work.

  2. False. Again what one group of users propagates is irrelevant to what another group propagates, unless there a direct reference is made to prior group. It is a sad attempt at caricaturing the entire group, to avoid looking at details on a case-by-case basis.

  3. Keep repeating the claim "it is a hoax" while not even addressing the evidence directly does not make it true. Address the evidence directly, then we can talk. I'm unable to respond to generalities.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No references to 4chan were made here :)

EDIT:

The list of code words that the pizzagaters were peddling for years was litterally made up by some anon from 4chan.

Source needed :) The claim that code words were invented on 4chan is repeated by MSM without actually linking to the thread where this happened.

Also this is a common strawman strategy used by MSM to dismiss investigation into Pizzagate:

  1. Some 4chan users speculated about what certain words refer to. Claim: The code words were 'invented' on 4chan.
  2. Some social media users propagated it. Claim: Entire pizzagate narrative rests on said invention.
  3. Claim: Thus it is a hoax.

Whereas the truth is:

  1. False. The investigation done by one group of users irrelevant to the one done by another group, unless a direct reference is made to prior group. Each separate investigation must be answered separately. What happened on 4chan is irrelevant to what I am looking into.

    The 'code words' were not 'invented' on 4chan. They exist in the emails. The reason they were singled out is because the context they are used in does not fit with their literal meaning and implies they are code for something else (Example: See post above for usage of 'pizza').

    The 'code words' are first discussed in this post by me :) I'm "not aware" of what theories others might be peddling :) If you have concerns about their theories, kindly address it to them. I can only answer for my work.

  2. False. Again what one group of users propagates is irrelevant to what another group propagates, unless there a direct reference is made to prior group. It is a sad attempt at caricaturing the entire group, to avoid looking at details on a case-by-case basis.

  3. Keep repeating the claim "it is a hoax" while not even addressing the evidence directly does not make it true. Address the evidence directly, then we can talk. I'm unable to respond to vague generalities.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No references to 4chan were made here :)

EDIT:

The list of code words that the pizzagaters were peddling for years was litterally made up by some anon from 4chan.

Source needed :) The claim that code words were invented on 4chan is repeated by MSM without actually linking to the thread where this happened.

Also this is a common strawman strategy used by MSM to dismiss investigation into Pizzagate:

  1. Some 4chan users speculated about what certain words refer to. Claim: The code words were 'invented' on 4chan.
  2. Some social media users propagated it. Claim: Entire pizzagate narrative rests on said invention.
  3. Claim: Thus it is a hoax.

Whereas the truth is:

  1. False. The investigation done by one group of users irrelevant to the one done by another group, unless a direct reference is made to prior group. Each separate investigation must be answered separately. What happened on 4chan is irrelevant to what I am looking into.

    The 'code words' were not 'invented' on 4chan. They exist in the emails. The reason they were singled out is because the context they are used in does not fit with their literal meaning and implies they are code for something else (Example: See post above for usage of 'pizza').

    The 'code words' are first discussed in this post by me :) I'm "not aware" of what theories others might be peddling :) If you have concerns about their theories, kindly address it to them. I can only answer for my work.

  2. False. Again what one group of users propagates is irrelevant to what another group propagates, unless there a direct reference is made to prior group. It is a sad attempt at caricaturing the entire group, to avoid looking at details on a case-by-case basis.

  3. Keep repeating the claim "it is a hoax" while not even addressing the evidence directly does not make it true. Address the evidence directly, then we can talk.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No references to 4chan were made here :)

EDIT:

The list of code words that the pizzagaters were peddling for years was litterally made up by some anon from 4chan.

Source needed :) The claim that code words were invented on 4chan is repeated by MSM without actually linking to the thread where this happened.

Also this is a common strawman strategy used by MSM to dismiss investigation into Pizzagate:

  1. Some 4chan users speculated about what certain words refer to. Claim: The code words were 'invented' on 4chan.
  2. Some social media users propagated it. Claim: Entire pizzagate narrative rests on said invention.
  3. Claim: Thus it is a hoax.

Whereas the truth is:

  1. False. The investigation done by one group of users irrelevant to the one done by another group, unless a direct reference is made to prior group. Each separate investigation must be answered separately. What happened on 4chan is irrelevant to what I am looking into.

    The 'code words' were not 'invented' on 4chan. They exist in the emails. The reason they were singled out is because the context they are used in does not fit with their literal meaning and implies they are code for something else (Example: See post above for usage of 'pizza').

    The 'code words' are first discussed in this post by me :) I'm "not aware" of what theories others might be peddling :) If you have concerns about their theories, kindly address it to them. I can only answer for m work.

  2. False. Again what one group of users propagates is irrelevant to what another group propagates, unless there a direct reference is made to prior group. It is a sad attempt at caricaturing the entire group, to avoid looking at details on a case-by-case basis.

  3. Keep repeating the claim "it is a hoax" while not even addressing the evidence directly does not make it true. Address the evidence directly, then we can talk.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No references to 4chan were made here :)

EDIT:

The list of code words that the pizzagaters were peddling for years was litterally made up by some anon from 4chan.

Source needed :) The claim that code words were invented on 4chan is repeated by MSM without actually linking to the thread where this happened.

Also this is a common strawman strategy used by MSM to dismiss investigation into Pizzagate:

  1. Some 4chan users speculated about what certain words refer to. Claim: The code words were 'invented' on 4chan.
  2. Some social media users propagated it. Claim: Entire pizzagate narrative rests on said invention.
  3. Claim: Thus it is a hoax.

Whereas the truth is:

  1. False. The investigation done by one group of users irrelevant to the one done by another group, unless a direct reference is made to prior group. Each separate investigation must be answered separately. What happened on 4chan is irrelevant to what I am looking into.

    The 'code words' were not 'invented' on 4chan. They exist in the emails. The reason they were singled out is because the context they are used in does not fit with their literal meaning and implies they are code for something else (Example: See post above for usage of 'pizza').

    The 'code words' are first discussed in this post by me :) I'm not aware of what theories others are peddling.

  2. False. Again what one group of users propagates is irrelevant to what another group propagates, unless there a direct reference is made to prior group. It is a sad attempt at caricaturing the entire group, to avoid looking at details on a case-by-case basis.

  3. Keep repeating the claim "it is a hoax" while not even addressing the evidence directly does not make it true. Address the evidence directly, then we can talk.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No references to 4chan were made here :)

Your comment history is interesting too.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No references to 4chan were made here :)

Let's let the Podestas speak for themselves through their emails.

Your comment history is interesting too.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No references to 4chan were made here. I intend not to.

Let's let the Podestas speak for themselves through their emails.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

No references to 4chan were made here. I intend not to. The evidence, if any, must stand on its own feet :)

2 years ago
1 score