Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public?
Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all. In fact target them using MSM, to give them credibility as an anti-establishment figure (one of the reasons people think Trump is anti-establishment is because of being targeted by MSM).
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public?
Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all. In fact target them using MSM, to give them credibility as an anti-establishment figure (one of the reasons people think Trump is anti-establishment is because of being targeted by MSM).
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi Can't trust even those who're "targeted" or "deplatformed" by the machinery. The targeting actually provides credibility to them as an anti-establishment figure (this is an important method of how people began to trust Trump, because they saw MSM was against him).
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi Can't trust even those who're "targeted" or "deplatformed" by the machinery. The targeting actually provides credibility to them as an anti-establishment figure (this is an important method of how people began to trust Trump, because they saw MSM was against him).
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi Can't trust even those who're "targeted" or "deplatformed" by the machinery. The targeting actually provides credibility to them as an anti-establishment figure (this is an important method of how people began to trust Trump, because they saw the MSM was against him).
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi Can't trust even those who're "targeted" or "deplatformed" by the machinery. The targeting actually provides credibility to them as an anti-establishment figure (this is an important method of how people began to trust Trump, because they saw the MSM was against him).
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi Can't trust even those who're "targeted" by the machinery. The targeting actually provides credibility to them as an anti-establishment figure (this is an important method of how people began to trust Trump, because they saw the MSM was against him).
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi Can't trust even those who're "targeted" by the machinery. The targeting actually provides credibility to them as an anti-establishment figure (this is an important method of how people began to trust Trump, because they saw the MSM was against him).
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi Damn can't trust even those who're "targeted" by the machinery. The targeting actually provides credibility to them as an anti-establishment figure (this is an important method of how people began to trust Trump, because they saw the MSM was against him).
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi Damn can't trust even those who're "targeted" by the machinery. The targeting actually provides credibility to them as an anti-establishment figure (this is an important method of how people began to trust Trump, because they saw the MSM was against him).
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi Damn can't trust even those who're persecuted by MSM. The persecution actually provides credibility as a anti-establishment figure (this is an important method of how people began to trust Trump, because they saw the MSM was against him).
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events, sponsoring them with scholarships etc. and publicizing this information, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?
Yeah it checks out: https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=tulsi
This poses an interesting question:
Suppose association, by itself, with people and institutions the public considers to be part of the "elite" machinery (like David Rothschild, Zuckerberg, WEF etc.) is enough to deduce a person is part of the elite. Then wouldn't the elite try to "taint" any potential problematic individuals by inviting them to be part of such events/institutions and publicizing the images, and thereby sow doubts in the minds of the public? Also, any candidate that is actually their own agent, would be shielded from such association to get the public to trust them (eg: I have my doubts about people like David Icke or Lin Wood)? We are relying on data by the WEF after all.
I think about all the people Ghislaine Maxwell is seen with. Is that a small part of her blackmail (not all of it of course). A lot of photos of her with various people came out after her arrest, on social media. All these important people stand to lose their reputation if such images come out, even though they may not be involved with her shady business in any way, just happened to be there and she inserted herself in the frame?