Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You've debunked nothing because you haven't presented anything but opinions and speculation. I'm still the only one that's posted even a fucking delta-V value in this thread...and it supported my argument.

The burden of proof is on the person making the extraordinary claim. Putting men on the moon and getting them back is such an extraordinary claim, no country not even America has come anywhere close to doing so in 50 years, despite technology getting simultaneously more advanced and cheaper. I have presented evidence; the evidence supplied by NASA itself which is insufficient for any unbiased researcher. The evidence you have supplied is even worse than that.

...and random naturally occurring footpaths, and random naturally occurring objects that just happen to look like the body plan of a Apollo LM.

Is this evidence that there is a man's face on the surface of Mars? https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/2107/MartianFace_Viking_960.jpg No? But it looks exactly like a face!

Randomly naturally occuring sites that just happen to look like sketches from the Apollo records.

Oh, my sweet summer child... they sketched the pictures based on the naturally occurring sites. It didn't happen the other way around. WhOa how could they have possibly obtained the resources to pull that one off? lol that's sarcasm in case you couldn't tell.

No, they just got rid of all the smart white people and filled the org with diversity hires and climate fairies.

Now I see you're trying to deflect this into something about race? Is that really rational? Listen, you're clearly getting upset, just like I was, so I think it's best for now that I let you sit and chew on the world-shattering information I provided. I genuinely can empathize though. It took me over half a fucking year to work through this emotionally. I'll be the first to admit I behaved as irrationally as you are right now:

"ME? Wrong about something so big for so long? POPPYCOCK! It is THEY the CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRiStS who are wrong. I can solve differential equations! Can THEY? NO! Therefore I AM RIGHT!!!"

Even if it takes you a year to admit that you don't have a good reason to believe the US government put men on the moon in 1969, that's still better than most people. You never have to explicitly concede defeat to me, but going forward remember that there is no real need for you to maintain the lie to everyone else. Perhaps you could try doing some investigating on your own instead of relying on youtube videos, hm?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The burden of proof is on the person making the extraordinary claim. Putting men on the moon and getting them back is such an extraordinary claim, no country not even America has come anywhere close to doing so in 50 years, despite technology getting simultaneously more advanced and cheaper. I have presented evidence; the evidence supplied by NASA itself which is insufficient for any unbiased researcher. The evidence you have supplied is even worse than that.

...and random naturally occurring footpaths, and random naturally occurring objects that just happen to look like the body plan of a Apollo LM.

Is this evidence that there is a man's face on the surface of Mars? https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/2107/MartianFace_Viking_960.jpg No? But it looks exactly like a face!

Randomly naturally occuring sites that just happen to look like sketches from the Apollo records.

Oh, my sweet summer child... they sketched the pictures based on the naturally occurring sites. It didn't happen the other way around. WhOa how could they have possibly obtained the resources to pull that one off? lol that's sarcasm in case you couldn't tell.

No, they just got rid of all the smart white people and filled the org with diversity hires and climate fairies.

Now I see you're trying to deflect this into something about race? Is that really rational? Listen, you're clearly getting upset, just like I was, so I think it's best for now that I let you sit and chew on the world-shattering information I provided. I genuinely can empathize though. It took me over half a fucking year to work through this emotionally. I'll be the first to admit I behaved as irrationally as you are right now:

"ME? Wrong about something so big for so long? POPPYCOCK! It is THEY the CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRiStS who are wrong. I can solve differential equations! Can THEY? NO! Therefore I AM RIGHT!!!"

Even if it takes you a year to admit that you don't have a good reason to believe the US government put men on the moon in 1969, that's still better than most people. You never have to explicitly concede defeat to me, but going forward remember that there is no real need for you to maintain the lie to everyone else. Perhaps you could try doing some investigating on your own instead of relying on youtube videos, hm?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The burden of proof is on the person making the extraordinary claim. Putting men on the moon and getting them back is such an extraordinary claim, no country not even America has come anywhere close to doing so in 50 years, despite technology getting simultaneously more advanced and cheaper. I have presented evidence; the evidence supplied by NASA itself which is insufficient for any unbiased researcher. The evidence you have supplied is even worse than that.

...and random naturally occurring footpaths, and random naturally occurring objects that just happen to look like the body plan of a Apollo LM.

Is this evidence that there is a man's face on the surface of Mars? https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/2107/MartianFace_Viking_960.jpg No? But it looks exactly like a face!

Randomly naturally occuring sites that just happen to look like sketches from the Apollo records.

Oh, my sweet summer child... they sketched the pictures based on the naturally occurring sites. It didn't happen the other way around. WhOa how could they have possibly obtained the resources to pull that one off? lol that's sarcasm in case you couldn't tell.

Now I see you're trying to deflect this into something about race? Is that really rational? Listen, you're clearly getting upset, just like I was, so I think it's best for now that I let you sit and chew on the world-shattering information I provided. I genuinely can empathize though. It took me over half a fucking year to work through this emotionally. I'll be the first to admit I behaved as irrationally as you are right now:

"ME? Wrong about something so big for so long? POPPYCOCK! It is THEY the CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRiStS who are wrong. I can solve differential equations! Can THEY? NO! Therefore I AM RIGHT!!!"

Even if it takes you a year to admit that you don't have a good reason to believe the US government put men on the moon in 1969, that's still better than most people. You never have to explicitly concede defeat to me, but going forward remember that there is no real need for you to maintain the lie to everyone else. Perhaps you could try doing some investigating on your own instead of relying on youtube videos, hm?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The burden of proof is on the person making the extraordinary claim, my child. Putting men on the moon and getting them back is such an extraordinary claim, no country not even America has come anywhere close to doing so in 50 years, despite technology getting simultaneously more advanced and cheaper. I have presented evidence; the evidence supplied by NASA itself which is insufficient for any unbiased researcher. The evidence you have supplied is even worse than that.

Now you're trying to deflect this into something about race? Is that really rational? Listen, you're clearly getting upset, just like I was, so I think it's best for now that I let you sit and chew on the world-shattering information I provided. I genuinely can empathize though. It took me over half a fucking year to work through this emotionally. I'll be the first to admit I behaved as irrationally as you are right now:

"ME? Wrong about something so big for so long? POPPYCOCK! It is THEY the CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRiStS who are wrong. I can solve differential equations! Can THEY? NO! Therefore I AM RIGHT!!!"

Even if it takes you a year to admit that you don't have a good reason to believe the US government put men on the moon in 1969, that's still better than most people. You never have to explicitly concede defeat to me, but going forward remember that there is no real need for you to maintain the lie to everyone else. Perhaps you could try doing some investigating on your own instead of relying on youtube videos, hm?

2 years ago
1 score