Ill slow walk you through it.

• Guy 1: "Hey, I just got out of quarantine. Had covid. Tested poisitive." or "I think I had it. No test."

  Me: "Or really? What were your symptoms?"

  Guy 1: "Well you know, sniffles, sneezes." or "Oh none. They said im asymptomatic."

Okay goes into the "fake and gay" folder.

• Guy 2: "Hey, I had or I think had, covid with or without positive test."

  Me: "Oh really? How was it?"

  Guy 2: "Awful. I couldn't breath. I was bed ridden for 3 weeks. I still can't taste anything. Still not myself."

Put that into the "huh that's odd" folder.

Compile the data. Come to conclusions. Challenge them here.

I would use the PCR test but theyre unreliable crap. All science is observation and assumptions. So yes. I assume. I have no hard evidence, because, thanks to the cabal, there is litterally no reliable way for me to obtain hard evidence.

Now, walk me through your proof of vax being a clot shot and lets compare tactics? Is it not conformation bias? Observable data and too many coincidences?

Ill slow walk you through it.

• Guy 1: "Hey, I just got out of quarantine. Had covid. Tested poisitive." or "I think I had it. No test."

  Me: "Or really? What were your symptoms?"

  Guy 1: "Well you know, sniffles, sneezes." or "Oh none. They said im asymptomatic."

Okay goes into the "fake and gay" folder.

• Guy 2: "Hey, I had or I think had, covid with or without positive test."

  Me: "Oh really? How was it?"

  Guy 2: "Awful. I couldn't breath. I was bed ridden for 3 weeks. I still can't taste anything. Still not myself."

Put that into the "huh that's odd" folder.

Compile the data. Come to conclusions. Challenge them here.

I would use the PCR test but theyre unreliable crap. All science is observation and assumptions. So yes. I assume. I have no hard evidence, because, thanks to the cabal, there is litterally no reliable way for me to obtain hard evidence.

Now, walk me through your proof of vax being a clot shot and lets compare tactics? Is it not conformation bias? Observable data and too many coincidences? If I had said "they died from shot" would you not believe it more readily?

Ill slow walk you through it.

• Guy 1: "Hey, I just got out of quarantine. Had covid. Tested poisitive." or "I think I had it. No test."

  Me: "Or really? What were your symptoms?"

  Guy 1: "Well you know, sniffles, sneezes." or "Oh none. They said im asymptomatic."

Okay goes into the "fake and gay" folder.

• Guy 2: "Hey, I had or I think had, covid with or without positive test."

  Me: "Oh really? How was it?"

  Guy 2: "Awful. I couldn't breath. I was bed ridden for 3 weeks. I still can't taste anything. Still not myself."

Put that into the "huh that's odd" folder.

Compile the data. Come to conclusions. Challenge them here.

I would use the PCR test but theyre unreliable crap. All science is observation and assumptions. So yes. I assume. I have no hard evidence, because, thanks to the cabal, there is litterally no reliable way for me to obtain hard evidence.

Now, walk me through your proof of vax being a clot shot and lets compare tactics? Is it not conformation bias? Data and coincidences? If I had said "they died from shot" would you not believe it more readily?

Ill slow walk you through it.

• Guy 1: "Hey, I just got out of quarantine. Had covid. Tested poisitive." or "I think I had it. No test."

  Me: "Or really? What were your symptoms?"

  Guy 1: "Well you know, sniffles, sneezes." or "Oh none. They said im asymptomatic."

Okay goes into the "fake and gay" folder.

• Guy 2: "Hey, I had or I think had, covid with or without positive test."

  Me: "Oh really? How was it?"

  Guy 2: "Awful. I couldn't breath. I was bed ridden for 3 weeks. I still can't taste anything. Still not myself."

Put that into the "huh that's odd" folder.

Compile the data. Come to conclusions. Challenge them here.

I would use the PCR test but theyre unreliable crap. All science is observation and assumptions. So yes. I assume. I have no hard evidence, because there is litterally no reliable way for me to have hard evidence.

Now, walk me through your proof of vax being a clot shot and lets compare tactics? Is it not conformation bias? Data and coincidences? If I had said "they died from shot" would you not believe it more readily?

Ill slow walk you through it.

• Guy 1: "Hey, I just got out of quarantine. Had covid. Tested poisitive." or "I think I had it. No test."

  Me: "Or really? What were your symptoms?"

  Guy 1: "Well you know, sniffles, sneezes." or "Oh none. They said im asymptomatic."

Okay goes into the "fake and gay" folder.

• Guy 2: "Hey, I had or I think had, covid with or without positive test."

  Me: "Oh really? How was it?"

  Guy 2: "Awful. I ccouldn't reath. I was bed ridden for 3 weeks. I still can't taste anything. Still ​till not myeself."

Put that into the "huh that's odd" folder.

Compile the data. Come to conclusions. Challenge them here.

I would use the PCR test but theyre unreliable crap. All science is observation and assumptions. So yes. I assume. I have no hard evidence, because there is litterally no reliable way for me to have hard evidence.

Now, walk me through your proof of vax being a clot shot and lets compare tactics? Is it not conformation bias? Data and coincidences? If I had said "they died from shot" would you not believe it more readily?