Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest—Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness,” then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinisn: That survivors survive.

What a nonsence. All fitting to environment survive. Or rather more clearly:

those who not fit to their environment too much do not survive enough to have offspring.

Truism so.But big one. This is really Darwin's theory.

"Survival of the fittest" is vulgar and wrong interpretation by half-brain calvinists for whom that was scientific confirmation of their "supremacy".

It is the same like human ancestor being monkey.

It is not.Common ancestor who could be called monkey (and who said evolution wasn't tool of God who is REASON to create another sentient reason at his image). What is also forgotten but was from ancient times known to ancient "primitive" nations - we share much with all other life,all animals and even maybe plants.

Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest—Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness,” then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinisn: That survivors survive.

What a nonsence. All fitting to environment survive. Or rather more clearly:

those who not fit to their environment too much do not survive enough to have offspring.

Truism so.But big one. This is really Darwin's theory.

"Survival of the fittest" is vulgar and wrong interpretation by half-brain calvinists for whom that was scientific confirmation of their "supremacy".

Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest—Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness,” then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinisn: That survivors survive.

What a nonsence. All fitting to environment survive. Or rather more clearly:

those who not fit to their environment too much do not survive enough to have offspring.

Truism so.But big one. This is really Darwin's theory.

Survival of the fittest is vulgar interpretation by half-brain calvinists for whom that was scientific confirmation of their "supremacy".

Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest—Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness,” then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinisn: That survivors survive.

What a nonsence. All fitting to environment survive. Or rather more clearly:

those who not fit to their environment too mych do not survive enough to have offspring.

Truism so.But big one. This is really Darwin's theory.

Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest—Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness,” then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinisn: That survivors survive.

What a nonsence. All fitting to environment survive. Or rather more clearly:

those who not fit to their environment do not survive enough to have offspring.

Truism so.But big one.

Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest—Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness,” then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinisn: That survivors survive.

What a nonsence. All fitting to environment survive. Or rather more clearly:

those who not fit to their environment do not survive.