One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power.

Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination. The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

I'm currently leaning away from untargeted de-population. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas on what they might intend:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by practical experience in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. Lockdowns allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want. Eg: xyz was suspected of exposure to COVID infected, xyz quarantined, xyz unfortunately passed away in quarantine.

   EDIT: Adverse effects are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it because "what do you have to lose"?

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power.

Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination. The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

I'm currently leaning away from untargeted de-population. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas on what they might intend:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by practical experience in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

   EDIT: Adverse effects are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it because "what do you have to lose"?

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power.

Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination. The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

I'm currently leaning away from untargeted de-population. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas on what they might intend:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by practical experience in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

   EDIT: Adverse effects are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it because "what do you have to lose"?

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power.

Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination. The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

I'm currently leaning away from untargeted de-population. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas on what they might intend:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by practical experience in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

   EDIT: Adverse effects are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it just to be safe.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power.

Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination. The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

I'm currently leaning away from untargeted de-population. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas on what they might intend:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by practical experience in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

   EDIT: Adverse effects are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it just to be safe.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by practical experience in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

   EDIT: Adverse effects are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it just to be safe.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by practical experience in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

   EDIT: Adverse effects are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it just to be safe.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

   EDIT: Adverse effects are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it just to be safe.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

   EDIT: Adverse effects are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it just to be safe.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

   EDIT: Negative reactions are actually useful here, since they ensure a group of vaccine hesitant people who can be blamed for the resurgence. The vaxxers then blame and fight with vaccine hesitant for the lockdown, instead of the government. If vaccine was safe but ineffective, most would take it just to be safe.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can ignore the impulse with your will, but how many do that?): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can override it with your will, but only if you were paying attention to it): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this (note this is not mind control, but neuron control. You can override it with your will, but only if you were paying attention to it): https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this: https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zNFZTRXZ/2018-physics-article-describes-e/c/

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this: https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this: https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this: https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

   Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

   The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.

5. Some kind of method of firing certain neurons based on this: https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

    > Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.
    > 
    > The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.
   

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.

   • Or some kind of rudimentary method of firing certain neurons based on this: https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

     Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

     The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.

   • Or some kind of rudimentary method of firing certain neurons based on this: https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/

     Once the virus had enough time to infect and transform the target neurons, the researchers switched on a radio transmitter tuned to 465 kHz, a little below the band used for AM radio.

     The neurons responded. They began to fire, signaling a shortage of glucose even though the animal’s blood sugar levels were normal. And other parts of the body responded just as they would to a real drop in blood sugar: insulin levels fell, the liver started pumping out more glucose, and the animals started eating more.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting or immune system going into overdrive, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting, only because there's been news about nanoparticles triggered by certain frequencies etc.

One problem with the indiscriminate/untargeted depopulation theory: remember there will always be certain workers that are essential to the elite: police and military to protect the elite and their property, judicial and government workers to recognize their legal rights (what would happen in an anarchy when people just occupy Bill Gates' farms?), scientists to continue developing the tech that has given them so much power. Currently the vaccine is being pushed to everyone without discrimination.

The elite don't want to damage the system they've built to keep themselves rich.

That's why I'm currently away from untargeted de-population and leaning towards the theory that the negative effects are not the primary intention, but something else. Of course they aware that some % of people will die/suffer, but that's just collateral damage to them. Some ideas include:

1. Subscription style vaccine revenue. mRNA is ideal for this since it offers a narrow range of immunity (specific protein only) and is easy to update.

2. Some kind of tagging that works from a distance like a barcode. Well why not just use phones instead? Because in a dystopian regime, people would ditch their phones (even cut out an embedded RFID chip) if it got them into trouble. But if a tag is spread throughout the body/embedded into an organ itself? Can't get rid of that even through surgery.

3. Lockdowns resume, having shown by demonstration in most countries, that the vaccine is unable to stop the spread. They allow for a more targeted de-population, if that's really what they want.

4. Some kind of a kill switch that can be activated by the right frequency of EM radiation/sound etc. to make it look like a death by clotting.