I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories, knowledge and beliefs of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories, knowledge and beliefs of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories and beliefs of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories and beliefs of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories and personality of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories and personality of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories and much of personality of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories and much of personality of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a microscopic object/microbe (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will, the possibility of an afterlife etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

She feels like another Sidney Powell.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here (for example the nature of consciousness, of free will etc.), it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife (at least with memories of this life) because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone.

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone?

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone?

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone?

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs. Either that, or the religion itself discourages asking such "heretical" questions.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone?

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs. Unless, of course, the religion itself discourages delving too deeply into such contradictions.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone?

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. * She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in many keywords at the end.

"Spiritual warfare" as if your "soul" can be affected by a vaccine. If so, then the soul is based in your biology, and is destroyed when your body is destroyed. So no afterlife would be possible.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many possible philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

I'm skeptical too.

• First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

• The leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

• She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First modern medicine is not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object (with no nervous system to speak of) does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

• Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone?

  • A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

• Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. As if your "soul" can be affected by a vaccine. If so, then the soul is based in your biology, and is destroyed when your body is destroyed. So no afterlife would be possible.

• She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in as many keywords as possible.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.

That was my thought as well. First she looks like trying to suppress a smile throughout the video.

What made me suspicious was the leap the doctor made from superconducting material to "superconducting is like an injectable computing system" while breaking into a laugh. That makes no sense at all, like saying "titanium is like a stealth fighter". To have a computing system you'd need something that can process logic, while a superconductor is just a fancy wire.

She also said she thought the tentacle thing was "self-aware" and "aware that we're watching it".. What? First we're not even certain all macroscopic animals animals possess self-awareness, and she thinks a nanoscale object with no nervous system to speak of does? Not something a medical professional would say, honestly.

Later, she says this is proof they putting an "operating system" inside people. What? A person of science with a very strange notion of "proof". I thought it was an injectable computing system (hardware) and not an operating system (software)? We haven't even begun to understand how a mind comes about in a biological organism such as man, and someone's already figured out how to program it biologically? Note: I'm not talking about psychologically programming someone?

A biologically programmable mind implies an embodied mind. So there would be no afterlife because the mind is destroyed when the body is. A religious person should be the last one to believe in the notion of an "embodied mind". Because it would imply nothing is left of the mind after death.

Then she drops buzzwords like "spiritual warfare" etc. all keywords that show up in vaccine hesitant circles. As if your "soul" can be affected by a vaccine. If so, then the soul is based in your biology, and is destroyed when your body is - again no afterlife.

She's dropping so many themes from vaccine hesitant circles, it feels like she's trying to jam in as many keywords as possible.

I can't believe how people on this site are both religious yet believe transhumanism is possible. There are so many philosophical contradictions here, it suggests so many people here don't bother thinking about the consistency of their own beliefs.