And that's just one book...
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion isn't it ? If I would do research for my master thesis in such manner I would never graduate. But it is all "ok",since they are PhD or higher not some M.Sc... XD
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ? (/s )
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying - Where is even repeatability of the result ? XD
Bót particulz phyzicizds are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics. And I think those people are too eager to give "answers". Good theory is useful and explains something.
And that's just one book...
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion isn't it ? If I would do research for my master thesis in such manner I would never graduate. But it is all "ok",since they are PhD or higher not some M.Sc... XD
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ? (/s )
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying. Where is even repeatability of the result ?
Bót particulz phyzicizds are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics. And I think those people are too eager to give "answers". Good theory is useful and explains something.
And that's just one book...
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion isn't it ? If I would do research for my master thesis in such manner I would never graduate. But it is all "ok",since they are PhD or higher not some M.Sc... XD
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ? (/s )
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizds are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics. And I think those people are too eager to give "answers". Good theory is useful and explains something.
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion. If I would do research for my master thesis in such manner I would never graduate. But it is "ok",since they are PhD or higher... XD
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ? (/s )
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizds are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics. And I think those people are too eager to give "answers". Good theory is useful and explains something.
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion. If I would do research for my master thesis in such manner I would never graduate. But it is "ok",since they are PhD or higher... XD
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ? (/s )
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizds are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics. And I think those people are too eager to give "answers".
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion. If I would do research for my master thesis in such manner I would never graduate. But it is "ok",since they are PhD or higher... XD
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ? (/s )
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics. And I think those people are too eager to give "answers".
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion. If I would do research for my master thesis in such manner I would never graduate. But it is ok,since they are PhD or higher... XD
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ? (/s )
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics. And I think those people are too eager to give "answers".
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion.
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ? (/s )
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics. And I think those people are too eager to give "answers".
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion.
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ? (/s )
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics.
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion.
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can sometimes go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ?
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics.
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion.
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it - except the fact that quantum "brick" can go through the wall like ghost) and it is enough - isn't it ?
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics.
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion.
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick (I mean quantum physics if you not get it) and it is enough - isn't it ?
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics.
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't be counted as shooting 1 lion.
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick and it is enough - isn't it ?
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics.
That's just one book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and only chosen results written on drive by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but shooting aardvark and giraffe shouldn't count as shooting 1 lion.
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick and it is enough - isn't it ?
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics.
That's just book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and written by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but...
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick and it is enough - isn't it ?
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.
Bót particulz phyzicizd are smardezd guyz on earth.
Sorry normies.I don't think so. I think rather that "standard model" is probably a way for smarter mathematicians to play and get academic degrees in physics.
That's just book.
Research methods in CERN are all confirmation bias. Tiny fraction of percent of particles observed and written by algorithms. And when it was first time observed it looked rather like 2 particles with energies near perceived Higgs particle so they said it was Higgs. I was not checking all their tests,but...
By the way only smarter apes aka average humans could invent such brilliant idea: throw fast brick on brick to crush the brick and if some shrapnel-brick will hit in exact way it proves some theory about microstructure of the brick.After all we learned about basic aerodynamics of the brick and it is enough - isn't it ?
No accelerator is currently even outside earth gravity well. Just saying.